• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"In 'Antony and Cleopatra', Shakespeare is particularly interested in the psychological burdens that those in positions of power must endure". Examine the different representations of leadership in the play.

Extracts from this document...


"In 'Antony and Cleopatra', Shakespeare is particularly interested in the psychological burdens that those in positions of power must endure". Examine the different representations of leadership in the play. As is often true of the study of history in general, the people who dominate Shakespeare's historical plays are those in positions of power and authority. This is simply because such people will be the ones to effect history in the most significant way. In 'Antony and Cleopatra' we see several different leadership figures, who show all of the range of burdens, strains and qualities that those in positions of power can have (such as Antony himself, Cleopatra, Caesar, Lepidus and Pompey). In terms of leadership, Classical Renaissance ideas can be very helpful when trying to approach Antony and Cleopatra for the first time. The traditional idea of heroism and leadership was summed up in the quality known as 'virtus', which describes the characteristics of a virile nature, military strength, and old ideas of chivalry and honour. Renaissance artists such as Machiavelli in 'The Prince', modified this to emphasise calm ruthlessness and intellectual power. As we shall see, these two opposing views of what a leader should be (the traditional and renaissance ideals) are reflected in the struggle between Antony and Caesar. Antony, representing the old 'virus' values, is defeated and replaced by Caesar, representing the Machiavellian hero. Thus I shall begin with these two characters, whose conflict is vitally central to the play. ...read more.


This seems all the more heartless when we realise that Antony was a close and dear friend to Octavius's father, Julius Caesar. However at the same time he is shown as the successful strategist and ruler. This pehaps is meant to demonstate the idea that a truly great leader cannot be an overly emotionally figure. He represents Roman efficiency and Duty to the state, whose interests must be held before all others, and achieved by whatever means necessary. This manipulative nature is shown through his reconciliation with Antony. Caesar needs Antony's military skill in the war against Pompey, and can see that the Roman people, who do not love Caesar ("Caesar gets money where/ he loses hearts" Act2 Scene1), will follow the heroic Antony into battle. The marriage that he orchestrates between his sister and Antony shows that he is a figure who is only able to gain loyalty through his manipulation of others. We must still recognise, however, that Caesar has all the qualities necessary to be a good leader. Indeed he seems not to feel any of the psychological burdens that come with leadership. He seems to be sufficiently focused on the success of Rome, to think that any burdens he does feel must be tolerated out of a sense of duty, but also to satisfy his ambition. He sees Antony as having become a "strumpet's fool", and his pursuit of pleasure being an intolerable burden placed on the triumvirate. ...read more.


Even so, neither generous tolerance, nor any other of the humane qualities that Lepidus shows, are seen (at least in Shakespeare's eyes) to be insignificant on the grand scale of events. Our last image of him, is the sight of the third "pillar of the world" being carried out drunk. Lepidus's eventual imprisonment by Caesar acts as an example that, in the world of politics and power, benevolence will always be crushed by ruthlessness. Pompey, like Lepidus is another slightly mediocre leader. His reputation and power stem from the esteem in which his father Pompey the Great was held. Indeed the strong position he is in only exists because of the total disarray that the triumvirate is in. Despite this he accepts the terms he is offered by them very readily (largely due to Antony's presence), a decision that causes Menas to doubt his judgement: "the father, Pompey, would ne'er have made this treaty". Pompey's refusal to sanction the murder of the triumvirs, whilst admitting that he would have welcomed its being done without his knowledge, reveals a lot about Pompey. It shows at once a cowardice and lack of ruthlessness that, (like Lepidus) means that he can never be a truly successful leader. Through the characterisation of the different leaders mentioned above, Shakespeare manages to demonstrate the different strains that those in positions of power must tolerate, and we see that in the end there is no room for romantic compassion or weakness, if one wants to become a successful leader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Antony and Cleopatra section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Antony and Cleopatra essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    'Ruthless leader....loving brother....boring Puritan....gracious victor.' Explore the way in which Shakespeare presents the character ...

    He says how they should 'Let Rome in Tiber melt, and the wide arch Of the ranged empire fall.' This shows how Antony appears less loyal, towards Rome, but it is clear throughout the rest of the play that he is loyal to other things such as his followers.

  2. Examine the contrast between Cleopatra and Octavia. How do they embody different aspects of ...

    Cleopatra is Egypt and Octavia is Rome, Antony must choose which life to led. Cleopatra and Octavia act merely as a visible contrast between each other's culture.

  1. "A better title for this play would be 'Cleopatra and Antony' because Cleopatra is ...

    precisely as a succession of moments", he lived for the moment and for Cleopatra's love. If the play were to be renamed Cleopatra, Rome and Antony's part to play in the political side would possibly not be included. If Shakespeare had called the play 'Cleopatra' he would have been stretching

  2. Explore how Shakespeare develops the themes of duty

    the love between Antony and Cleopatra is a disapproving look through the eyes of a Roman soldier. In the microcosm of the first scene we see the negative Roman views of Cleopatra juxtaposed with Antony's insurmountable ("then must though needs find out new heaven, new earth.")

  1. The central concerns of the Antony and Cleopatra as illustrated by Act 1, Scene ...

    part of their attraction to each other is that they both want power. "They value their positions as world figures, and their affection is grounded in this appreciation" (Hudson Shakespeare Company, 1998b: no page number). Antony even promises to "piece her opulent throne with kingdoms" (1.5.48), and she sees him as "Emperor Antony" (5.2.75)

  2. Discuss the presentation and dynamics of the triumvirate in Antony and Cleopatra

    position and compares his effectiveness to 'the holes where eyes should be'. It becomes clear that the relationships among the members of the triumvirs is a cause for attention as we are introduced by Philo to Antony's disregard for Caesar's messages and Lepidus's failure in his effort at peacemaking.

  1. Write a concise account of the history of the Lutheran passion up to Bach's ...

    Lechner developed the style by using syncopation that often created suspensions, and sudden modulations into keys that are not closely related to the tonic, i.e. from F major into Eb major. He uses imitation in the crowd scenes to pictoralising the crowd falling over each other in their frenzy and repetition to reinforce questioning, sometimes called interrogatio.

  2. In Act 5 of Antony and Cleopatra, Maecenas says that Antonys taints and honours ...

    The audience cannot at this stage in the play concur or disagree with this observation, but with further understanding of Antony?s character as the play progresses, one can acknowledge the view of moralistic critics, that disparage Antony, claiming him to be ?a flighty, infatuated slave to an excess of love and luxury?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work