'In Cold Blood' and 'Frankenstein'. Compare how Capote and Shelley use different techniques for characterisation and their use of emotive, figurative language with the use of repition to show the theme of wasted lives

Authors Avatar

Part A- Compare how Capote and Shelley use different techniques for characterisation and their use of emotive, figurative language with the use of repition to show the theme of wasted lives

        'In Cold Blood' was written in 1966 when screenplays were very common. Authors such as Shakespeare wrote traditional plays so it was unpredictable that the readers of 'In Cold Blood' would respond to the novel well as it was the first non fiction novel Capote wrote. Capote wanted to experiment with his writing using narrative techniques of the novel to depict real life events. Capote believed that the narrator should not interrupt in novels; but the characters should tell the story themselves.

        Capote was able to write a novel which displayed the real events surrounding the murder of the Herb Clutter family and shaped it into a storyline. 'In Cold Blood' is based on a true story of the murders of a family- something which would be wrote about in today's society. The novel is an account of the events but also contains elements of Capote's creativity therefore it is hard to tell whether it is fictional or factual.

Join now!

        'Frankenstein' on the other hand is a non fictional novel which is still read and appreciated today as it is of a gothic genre. 'Frankenstein' was written in 1818 when science was seen as exciting but also dangerous as it was trespassing on the territory of God. The early 19th century was a time which generated exceptional events and ideas therefore it must have been quite interesting to read 'Frankenstein'. The danger of science was a great classic theme and Shelley provided her gothic genre as a framework to tone the horror of failed science- the famous experiment gone wrong. 'Frankenstein' ...

This is a preview of the whole essay