King Lear: Act I Scene IV

Authors Avatar

Work by c. kyriacou

Discuss your response to Lear in Act I Scene IV

Role reversal is central to the plot of King Lear, and perhaps one of the most pivotal scenes which stresses role reversal has truly occurred is Act I Scene IV. Following both the foolish division of Lear’s land and the utter destruction of natural order, King Lear begins to realise his ‘power’ has been stripped and even those below him begin to realise this and treat him accordingly. The act welcomes a disguised Kent who still wishes to serve his King despite Lear’s earlier mistreatment towards him. Act I Scene IV also introduces the Fool which has been mentioned to have been in hiding since Cordelia’s banishment. The jester begins to commentate on Lear’s illogical decisions and the consequences of them while Lear infuriates at the fact that he is receiving little, or no respect from those around him.

Firstly, Lear close to the beginning of the scene realises he has been mistreated as a King and as a father. There seems to be a kind of unnatural theme running throughout the play heretofore and it continues in Act I Scene IV. Lear realises himself that he has been ‘neglect of lately’ which is bizarre to an audience as he is, or was the King. Despite his current status, he still was noble: does nobility and respect dissolve with retirement? Indeed, Lear probably didn’t retire but rather quit his responsibilities and leadership but still, an audience may begin to sympathise with Lear as he is receiving nothing from his daughters, nothing as a father, and nothing as a nobleman.

Join now!

The first amazing sign of disrespect against Lear is that of Goneril’s steward Oswald. He addresses the king as ‘My Lady’s father’. Immediately, and quite rightly so, Lear is enraged that a steward of his daughter would not address him as King. Lear quickly curses Oswald: ‘whore-son dog!’ ‘slave!’ ‘cur!’. With the exclamation marks emphasising Lear’s sheer amazement that this steward, would disrespect him in such manner. He follows the insults by striking Oswald and at once a disguised Kent, remaining loyal to Lear, trips up Oswald and orders him to leave if he knows what is good for ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

An essay such as this which focuses on just one scene requires a more thorough approach. Here the writer picks on fairly random lines and ignores significant chunks of text particularly at the beginning and end of the scene. Although not every part of a scene can be dealt with in equal depth, there should be a greater sense of how the scene develops. Also, the question asks for a 'response' to Lear. There is evidence of a response here and the writer knows that there should be comment on the linguistic and dramatic effects which shape response. However, the comments made are imprecise and vague. So not much analytical rigour here, but just about enough evidence of response to merit ***.