Larkin has often been regarded as a hopeless and inflexible pessimist. In the light of the 'Whitsun Weddings' how true is this statement?

Authors Avatar

Larkin has often been regarded as a hopeless and inflexible pessimist.  In the light of the ‘Whitsun Weddings’ how true is this statement?

This statement is true to some extent, however, Larkin is regarded as this pessimistic writer of poetry because he is a realist poet.  In his work Larkin focuses on intense personal emotion but strictly avoided sentimentality or self-pity, therefore this would create a pessimistic view on his work.  Most of Larkin’s poetry is very observational and provincial, and his feelings of failure could have affected this.  

The death of his mother was the main foundation of his depression however in January 1942 he failed an army medical examination due to bad eyesight. He was therefore deemed unfit for military service.  This could have affected his depression, so as to outline a motive for his pessimistic poetry.  Having saying this, the amount of positive successes’ in Larkin’s life out numbers the failures.  Accolades were granted Larkin in 1965 for his major work on ‘The Whitsun Weddings’.  The Arts Council Triennial Award for poetry and the Queen’s Gold Medal for poetry.

Join now!

The ‘Whitsun Weddings’ contains many pessimistic poems, ‘Nothing to be said’ being one of the most opinionated poems in the collected works.  The poem starts off by means of criticism.

“Cobble-close families”, “nuclear family”, these quotes create images of cramped terrace houses in the Northern urban industrialisation areas such as Manchester.  Families seem very close and stick together more in these areas. Already we can see that Larkin has created a cynical view on things.  Looking deeper into the poem shows Larkin’s individualisation.  He shows in ‘Nothing to be said’, which is a subtle comment in itself that life is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay