Love and Conflict in Romeo And Juliet.

Authors Avatar

An essay on Love and Conflict in Romeo And Juliet

 by Ozhan O’Sullivan

Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet shows how love between the Capulet Romeo and Montague Juliet resolves an “ancient” conflict between the two families. The play was first performed in 1595, the play was Shakespeare’s first tragedy genre. Shakespeare believes the two lovers are bound by fate, “star-crossed”.

        We know that the hatred shown between both families is an “ancient grudge”, and that the rivalry is passed down the family tree. The prologue summarises the whole play in advance, this gives an overview of Romeo and Juliet’s actions.  

 Shakespeare uses different styles of speech to represent social classes in the play. The upper class speak in a more knowledgeable blank verse, while the lower classes speak in prose. A clear example of this is the way the servants at the beginning insult each while speaking in prose, however as soon as soon as more aristocratic people come in, they speak in blank verse.

 From the start of the play we see the servants of both houses show their dislike to each other. This is one of the major conflicts in the play. Sampson and Gregory are servants of the house of Capulet. The fact that the family rivalry and hatred is present in the low status of a servant, shows how “The quarrel is between our masters and us their men.”

The two Capulet servants show they are low in power as they speak in prose. They use puns as insults, “I mean, an we’ll be in choler we’ll draw”, as “choler” also means “anger”. They argue about their hatred for their enemy, insulting and mocking them in the process. They use sexual innuendo; Sampson says how he will rape the women of Montague, after he has dealt with the men, he will “ be cruel to the maids- I will cut off their heads.” Gregory replies “The heads of the maids?” Sampson then answers his question with “Ay, the heads of the maids, or their maidenheads.” “maidenheads” meaning virginity. The servants try to denote the Montague servants by referring to them as animals, “ A dog of the house of Montague moves me.”

Shakespeare inserts dramatic action to the play; he applies it to the fight between the servants that is bound to occur. He achieves this by causing excitement over the argument of the servants, and the intimidation shown to start a fight. The Capulet servants show they have pride and look down on Montague men, but they do not want to start a fight and get the blame for it, “I will frown as I pass by, and let them take it as they list.” The Capulet servants provoke the other house into fighting, by saying that they are leering them towards a fight, and if they reject they are cowards, “I will bite my thumb at them, which is a disgrace to bear it.” Shakespeare intensifies the dramatic action by showing verbal duelling between the two houses.

Join now!

Montague “Do you bite your thumb at us sir?”

Capulet “I do bite my thumb sir”

Montague “Do you bite your thumb at us sir?”

Capulet “No sir, I do not bite my thumb at you sir, but I do bite my thumb sir.”

This verbal duelling creates suspense to the physical fight, by both houses verbally fighting.

        Following the servants’ conflict, another conflict occurs between Benvolio and Montague Tybalt. The peacemaker Benvolio comes to the scene to try and resolve the conflict in a non-violent method, while “the fiery” Tybalt comes only to stir more trouble and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay