• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21

"Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of soldiers' experiences on the Western Front?"

Extracts from this document...


Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of soldiers' experiences on the Western Front? Andrew Denty Pa11 Mr. Burton History Coursework- "Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of soldiers' experiences on the Western Front?" World War 1 broke out in August 1914. There were numerous causes for war, the spirit of intense nationalism that existed in Europe throughout the 19th and into the 20th century, the political and economic rivalry among the largest nations such as France and Germany. Europe was split into two alliances; the Triple Entente, including Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, and the United States, and the Triple Alliance; including Germany, Turkey, Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria. The immediate trigger of the war was the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand on June 28th, 1914, in Austria-Hungary. This question asks me to evaluate sources, and so it is important to define its key terms. The Western front was a line of trenches stretching from the Belgium coast in the north to Switzerland in the south. This is where the majority of conflict took place. Victories on the battlefield were soon being measured in yards and stalemate set in. Conditions in the trenches were very poor; they were muddy and full of rats. The German trenches were much better dug-in than the Allies trenches. The Allies believed the war wouldn't last long, so there was no point in improving them. German trenches also had better vantage points than the Allies trenches. A map of the western front, from Compton's encyclopaedia. World War One produced a mass of poetry. Some were written by soldiers, such as Siegfried Sassoon's "The General". Other poems were written by people who had not fought in the war, and so are less likely to give an accurate portrayal of conditions on the front line. Poetry from World War One can be split up into to groups; poems from the early stages of war (1914, 1915), which tend ...read more.


decorum est pro patria Mori," this is a warning to young men who have not yet signed up for the war, and to the parents of these young men, saying that war is not glorious, and that it is not right and glorious to die for your country. This is the whole point of the poem; to warn people at home of the terrors of war. To make this warning as shocking and as effective as possible he has used descriptive language, which may well have been used to exaggerate the situation. Owen is just using the subject of gas as a vehicle to for fill his objective, to warn people about war; this seriously affects the reliability of this source. This poem is very one sided, only talking about the most terrible experiences; it overlooks less interesting occurrences to gain the readers attention. A point I need to take into account is that Owen wrote this poem whilst in Hospital suffering from shell shock; this would affect his mental state at the time of writing, so possibly causing him to exaggerate on certain points. Owen spent a long time on the front line, so probably witnessed many gas attacks. After a while memories become less clear, especially for events that occur more than once, so Owen could have written the poem including the worst bits from each of the attacks he witnessed. Also he may have intentionally taken the most shocking parts from each gas attack he witnessed in order to achieve his goal, which was to warn people about the horrors of war. This seriously affects the reliability of this source. In conclusion I think that this source has its limitations, however it seems to agree with many other sources, even if it is slightly exaggerated. The next source I will be studying is an official account, a photograph of British soldiers blinded by mustard gas. ...read more.


Official accounts are perhaps in some cases the least reliable of the sources I have studied due to censorship and the use as propaganda, however in my opinion they are the most useful source I have studied. This is because official accounts include a wide range of sources which can be looked at and compared with poems and stories, which often tend to be exaggerated. Not all official accounts I have looked at are censored, for example John Singer Sargent's "Gassed" (1918) which is a shocking painting of soldiers killed and injured by a gas attack. This source is very useful and in my opinion very accurate, as it is similar to a photograph. My hypothesis was not entirely accurate as far as official accounts were concerned. I started studying them with a preconception that they would be completely unreliable and of little use. Stories are particularly useful for giving running descriptions and conveying what a soldier is going though. Stories are not censored However many stories were written after World War One, so there were issues of memory, also the incentive of getting a piece published can affect the way in which the author writes. Many stories and letters written during the war are censored, to protect the author's family. A story I found particularly useful was Charles Young's interviewed about his war experiences in 1984, although it has its disadvantages, it contains a lot of useful information about why morale was low during the war, and clues to soldiers attitudes. I am unsure as to whether I can select one type of source as being the most accurate; however I can say that each type has its own strengths. As a result of my work I have found that Stories and poems tend to be the most accurate source types, however the most useful tend to be Official accounts and stories. I have found that in order to come to an accurate conclusion a wide range of sources is needed, as each source and source type has it's of strengths and weaknesses. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Conditions in the trenches during WW1 on the Western Front

    The soldiers were rationed to simply biscuits and cheese. They were also provided with jam, but no bread. A common breakfast meal was jam on cheese, and hard biscuits soaked in tea, as hot meals were only sometimes available to the officers in the trenches.

  2. In what ways did the attitudes of soldiers and civilians change towards the war ...

    In October 1915 the government reduced the time public houses were open from 5 am to 12:30pm to 12:00 noon to 2:30pm and 6:30 pm to 9:30 pm. Due to the things the government did to reduce drinking and other aspects such as food many people were angry at the government and lots of morale was lost due to this.

  1. How useful are Sources A, B and M to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Whilst some points and facts in his poem are accurate, his own personal background puts doubt on this, especially as the poem was not typical of the war times. His strong anti-war sentiment towards the Generals in particular casts further qualm over his poems and thus the reliability.

  2. to what extent and why had soldiers' attitudes to war changed by 1918

    Attitudes were positive because war seemed like an opportunity for improvement and prospect for people's lives. Attitudes started to change when the war had not finished months after Christmas of 1915. People became gradually more and more discouraged and less inclined to joining the army or believing the justice they had been shown in the propaganda.

  1. World War 1 is perhaps best known for being a war fought in trenches ...

    and sandbags were placed on the side and on the floor for extra support and a safe area for walking (Simkin). In spite of the fact that the trenches protected the soldiers, they stood no chance against the diseases. Body lice were among one of the diseases that traveled among the trenches the most.

  2. In what ways did the attitudes of soldiers and civilians change towards the war ...

    The German plan was to "bleed France white." From February to December, both sides flooded resources into the battle of Verdun. This battle was a slaughter of lives as the instigator of the offensive, General Erich von Falkenhayn, admitted that the aim to capture Verdun was impossible.

  1. Using selected poems by Wilfred Owen, Robert Graves and Siegfried Sassoon analyse the poets ...

    The tone is much more exciting and lively whereas the first stanza is more slower and more miserable. The second stanza begins with an imperative by the group's sergeant, and is the only spoken voice in the poem. Wilfred Owen also insults the military hierarchy and is not afraid to do so.

  2. Why was Trench Warfare so terrible

    The affects of shell shock varied depending on the case, mostly it lead to extreme panic and losing control mentally. Shell shock would build up from a number of symptoms. Firstly a soldier would become tired from the constant shelling and other factors that would keep them awake or becoming very tired from fighting.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work