Show how the anti-war poetry by Wilfred Owen dispels the myth of triumph and heroism portrayed by Alfred Lord Tennyson in ‘The charge of the light brigade.’

Authors Avatar

War poetry was very common during times of conflict. Most poets wrote from home using secondary evidence e.g. Alfred Lord Tennyson composed his poem as a result of reading a war correspondents account on the battle of Balaclava. "The Charge of the Light Brigade" recalls a disastrous historical military engagement that took place during the initial phase of the Crimean War the subject of this poem is a tactical blunder; Lord Raglan sent desperate orders to his Light Cavalry Brigade, finally, one of his orders was acted upon, and the brigade began charging--but in the wrong direction! Over 650 men rushed forward, and well over 100 died within the next few minutes.

Few war poets actually witnessed what happened, one who did though was Wilfred Owen. Owen was drafted during the 1st world war he was sent to France in 1917 where he experienced the worst war winter. He first saw action at Serre where he and half his platoon occupied a German bunker. A shell landed outside and blinded the soldier on sentry duty-this incident inspired his poem ‘The Sentry’. After battle experience, thoroughly shocked by the horrors of war he was diagnosed as having shell shock (neurasthenia) and went to Craig Lockhart war hospital. As a form of therapy patients were encouraged to pursue their pre-war interests and Owen turned to poetry. It was in Craig Lockhart where Owen wrote ‘Anthem for doomed youth’ and ‘Dulce et decorum est’.

By examining the charge of the light brigade composed by Alfred Lord Tennyson and three of Owen’s works – ‘Anthem for doomed youth’ ‘The Sentry’ and ‘Dulce et decorum est’ it becomes clear that the two poets deal with the concept of war in their writing in two contrasting ways. In general Tennyson tends to illustrate war as a deed of bravery and fortitude on behalf of the loyal soldiers, whilst Owen with his graphic representations and cynical depiction of war eludicates the pointlessness of conflict. I am going to compare and contrast the poems and explore the different views of war of Owen and Tennyson. Tennyson's patriotic poem epitomised the glorification of war that Owen so despised.

‘Anthem for doomed youth’ is an elegy, a lament for the dead; it is a judgement of war based on Owen’s experience itself. The title portrays the actual meaning of the poem: ‘doomed’ ‘youth’ the young boys, not yet men, of the country were doomed, condemned.’ ‘Dulce et decorum est’ (a Latin phrase meaning it is sweet and decorous to die for ones country) is an ironic title, its intention is not so much to induce pity as to shock, especially the civilians sitting at home who hold on strongly to the traditional beliefs that war is noble and glorious. Beliefs such as these were common in war poetry and world war one was the first occasion when a dramatic change was marked in poetry. Owen being one of the main poets to change poetry dealt with the grim reality of war in his work, Owen’s poems effectively exemplify the futility of antagonism, whereas Tennyson being an earlier poet (pre 20th century) glorifies war in his poetry.  The glorification of war means to elevate it to such a position that the soldiers who are participating in it believe that it is a heroic, loyal deed to give up ones life for their country.

In ‘The charge of the light brigade’ Tennyson manages to turn the sucicidal charge into an act of bravery even though many men lost their lives in pointless sacrifices. The dominant aspect of Tennyson’s composition is the glorious nature of what was accomplished by the soldiers (even though little was achieved), not the sadness of the lives lost. Whereas the dominant aspect of Owen’s poetry is the worthlessness and grief of the lives lost. Tennyson glosses over the brutality, the wastefulness, the death and the bleakness of conflict instead he venerates war and turns it into an undertaking of heroism and triumph.

Join now!

Stanza one in ‘Dulce et decorum est’ sets the scene; the soldiers are limping back from the Front, an appalling picture expressed through simile and metaphor. Such is the men’s wretched condition that they can be compared to old beggars, hags (ugly old women). ‘Bent double, like old beggars under sacks, / Knock-kneed, coughing like hags’ yet they were young! Barely awake from lack of sleep, their once smart uniforms resembling sacks, they cannot walk straight as their blood-caked feet try to negotiate the mud. ‘Blood-shod’ seems a dehumanising image- we think of horses shod not men. This method of dehumanising the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay