"Stanley has little option but to destroy Blanche" With close reference to the characters and their motives, to what extent do you agree with this statement?

Authors Avatar

Will Higgins

“Stanley has little option but to destroy Blanche”

With close reference to the characters and their motives, to what extent do you agree with this statement?

        I feel that I am in strong agreement with this statement. Blanche interfered with Stanley’s lifestyle, and he had little choice but to remove her from his world

The most obvious difference between  and  is one of social background. Whereas Blanche comes from an old Southern family and was raised to see herself as socially elite, Stanley comes from an immigrant family and is a proud member of the working class. They meet one another in the socially turbulent postwar period in New Orleans, one of America’s most diverse cities, and the facts point towards a turbulent relationship will occur between the two. Each represents values that are antagonistic to the other’s chance at success in the modern world. Blanche invades Stanley’s territory and is a threat to his lifestyle. He has little option but to destroy her.

Join now!

Within the play, ’s loyalty serves as a symbol of that societal success. Throughout the play Blanche tries to deter Stella from Stanley, “There’s even something – sub-human – something not quite to the stage of humanity yet!”, “He’s common!” and “There’s something downright – bestial – about him!” These are some examples of this. Blanche attempts to convince Stella to leave Stanley because she was born into a society that was of a higher class and had better values.

Stanley has a superior hold over Stella, sex. Sex is Stanley’s trump card, just when he feels that his ...

This is a preview of the whole essay