"Strange Meeting" by Susan Hill. Explore and evaluate the ways in which the war affects and changes the friendship between John Hilliard and David Barton.

Authors Avatar

Explore and evaluate the ways in which the war affects and changes the friendship between John Hilliard and David Barton.

    Strange Meeting is a novel written by Susan Hill, which was published in 1971. It is set in the First World War. The title of the book is taken from the First World War poet Wilfred Owen. It is a moving story focusing on youth and experience, hope and despair and friendship and love. It concentrates of the representation of relationship between the men in the trenches. This essay will explore and evaluate how the war affects and changes Barton and Hilliard’s relationship throughout the destructive and horrifying war. Strange Meeting presents us with typical world war images therefore we have a credible depiction of war.

  The novel has been written in a narrative and traditional style. The tradition has been mixed with the narrative to understand the characters. It has also been written in an epistolary style due to the integrated letters exchanged. Hilliard appreciates Barton’s family’s kindness to him, which contributes to his path to development; he appreciates Barton spiritually and physically.  

  In the summer of 1916, John Hilliard returned home on leave after a wounded leg at the Battle of Somme. Hilliard encountered nightmares that consisted of the sights of innocent men dying right in front of his eyes, the horrors of war and how people were unaware what it was like to live in such awful conditions, fearing death.  We can see this from the line ‘No-one knew, nobody understood’.  Hilliard is a very confused self-supressed character. He is also a stoic character who is unaware of his surroundings and quite isolated.  It’s not normal for a soldier to return from the war to go on leave and then wanting to be back in France, as he feels that where he belongs is in the trenches.

   Hilliard returned to France. As a result of the rate of deaths soldiers were replaced and Hilliard would struggle to see familiar faces. Part One Hilliard gets asked, “Have you met Mr Barton yet”? Hilliard is then taken to his billet, where he is finally introduced to David Barton whom is going to share his accommodation with. We can imply that Hilliard was very annoyed due to the fact he was looking forward to his own space and privacy. The fact that Hilliard is an omniscient character the idea of a ‘stranger’ enforces irrational anger. We can see that this from the line “Hilliard felt irrationally angry”. We can identify the complex sentence structure and the simple sentence structure. This symbolises the combination of inner conflict within himself. In order for Hilliard’s character to grow Barton must die. Hilliard believed that Barton was a likeable man who had qualities needed which other men lack, but he felt uncomfortable about his ability to speak openly. Whereas Barton’s character is whole but he has never experienced death and will be in for a shock. Through out the novel we see Barton change from a boy to man during his time in the front line, until his dramatic fall after his horrifying experience after a soldier gets shot in the head right in front of him.

Join now!

     As we continue through the book Barton’s family are introduced. Hilliard becomes involved in their correspondence due to his own families detachment. This shows that Hilliard and Barton are more than friends; Hilliard feels that it is his duty to keep him safe. Barton experiences death for the very first time, they were marching through an Orchard and came across plane wreckage and a dead German. After seeing this horrific experience Hilliard knows that this has affected Barton. “Hilliard recognized in another what he himself had known, the first time he saw a corpse in France”. Hilliard understands ...

This is a preview of the whole essay