Unity of Effect in Cask of Amontillado

Authors Avatar

Unity of Effect in “Cask of Amontillado”

Edgar Allan Poe, one of the great writers in American Literature, was far ahead his time in his vision of a special area of human experience -- the “inner” world of dream, hallucination, and imagination. In particular, he was distinctive from other writers by his systematic writing theory “unity of effect” which was interpreted in his essay “The Philosophy of Composition.”

According to his theory, “nothing is more clear than that every plot, worth the name, must be elaborated to its denouement before anything be attempted with the pen,” therefore “it is only with the denouement constantly in view that we can give a plot its indispensable air of consequence, or causation, by making the incidents, and especially the tone at all points, tend to the development of the intention.”

In “The Cask of Amontillado,” he embodies his theory by means of irony, symbolism and foreshadowing so as to develop the feelings of revenge possessed by the central character Montresor through his family traditions and personal philosophies, and Montresor’s comprehensive plan makes the readers learn that he has explicit notions concerning how revenge should be executed.

Join now!

Montresor’s family traditions give an implication to his feelings of revenge. He describes his family arms as “A huge human foot d’or, in a field azure; the foot crushes a serpent rampant whose fangs are embedded in the heel” (14). The arms suggest that the Montresor family is strong, so he will crush anyone or anything that attacks him or his family. In the context of the story, Fortunato is represented by the serpent, while Montresor is represented by the foot crushing the serpent. As the serpent injured the foot by biting it, Fortunato injured Montresor by insulting him and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay