The conflict at Dale Farm in Crays Hill, Essex is predominantly over territory. There are factors of culture and ethnicity that could be included, as the conflict has progressed, but it originated over territory. The conflict originated between 19

Authors Avatar

For a conflict over the use of a local resource, analyse the causes of the conflict and assess the extent to which it has been/can be resolved to the satisfaction of all those concerned.

Conflict is a state of discord or disagreement caused by the actual or perceived opposition of needs, values and interests between people. It is often the result of opposing views about the ways in which a resource might be developed or used. A conflict can involve violence and can be extreme but not always. Conflict also refers to an ongoing state of hostility between two or more groups of people. There are 5 causes of conflict: ethnicity, culture, territory ideology and identity.

The conflict at Dale Farm in Cray’s Hill, Essex is predominantly over territory. There are factors of culture and ethnicity that could be included, as the conflict has progressed, but it originated over territory. The conflict originated between 1999 and 2001 as buildings and structures were erected without permission. The site falls under the authority of Basildon Council, where Tony Ball is the leader.

On Monday 14th May 2011, after a decade of conflict, Basildon Borough Council (BBC) voted 28 to 10 to forcible evict 86 families from Dale Farm. The eviction was to take place from 19th September onwards. BBC withdrew from negotiations with the travellers and omitted to assisting to locate suitable alternative land. This is a conflict that is relatively complicated with court decisions changing from one day to the next, and has spread over such a long period of time. In 2007, the conflict even became the subject of the Judicial Renew Proceedings and was heard in 2008.

The Travellers have used many arguments in an attempt to prevent the eviction from the site. They believe that as they are the rightful owners of the site, there is no reason why they should not be allowed to build what they like. Although the council have argued, in accordance to this, that everyone must gain planning permission for building on greenbelt land. The Travellers however responded with the argument that most of the residents are poor and vulnerable and are unable to afford to meet the costs of identifying sites and applying for planning permission as it is particularly expensive. The Travellers also believe that planning law is not applied fairly. Using statistics for the Commission for Racial Equality, over 90% of Traveller planning applications are initially rejected. The Travellers reject the council’s argument that the land is greenbelt, saying the council is biased as the council have complained that the county already has too many travellers.  The Gypsy Council have tried, without success, to argue that if this is true the council have used their discretion to override the greenbelt status of other areas in the past. The Travellers have tried to use their lifestyle as their main defence. They believe that planning laws do not take into account lifestyle and culture, and should not be applied across the board so generally.

Join now!

Some travellers chose to put their hands in barrels of concrete, whilst others lay on mattresses behind a 30ft blockade, which a sign across read ‘Behind this gate a woman is attached by her neck. If you try to open this gate you will kill her.’ Whilst these where particularly extreme travellers, others were not. Those who were fairly liberal feared for their lives as up to 20 families fled Dale Farm and set up another illegal site 55 miles away near Luton. It does stand to question whether all of the Travellers really want to live their lifestyle or ...

This is a preview of the whole essay