Three presidents and their approach to foreign policy

Roosevelt, Taft and Wilson were three American presidents. Their presidency (as a whole) went on for 18 years between 1901-1917. All were American and admired their demanding job. But was there a difference? Well the answer is their approach to foreign policy. From dealing with foreign matters to challenging whether or not war is the solution; all three presidents had different approaches. In this essay I will look at and attempt to state the differences between the presidents and why some (if not all) were good in their demanding role as president of the United States.

     The first of the three to ‘reign’ as president was Roosevelt. He was president between 1901 and 1909.  Also known as ‘Teddy’ (which came from his first name Theodore). He approached presidency with ‘big stick’ theory. He was not afraid to use economic strength and/or military power. An example of this would be the vast growth of the American Navy. He did not once think whether this would arouse suspicion with other nations. His theory was if something needs doing-do it! The navy in actual fact doubled in size between 1901 and 1909. Along with the size of the navy, its expenditure grew by over 50 million US dollars. Roosevelt (being the show off he is) sent the US ‘Great White’ fleet around the world to show just how much of a naval power America is. He wanted to ‘signal’ America’s power and presence to the world, which he did (there is another reason which will be underlined later on). Roosevelt worked effectively in ending the Russo-Japanese war. As the Japanese won the war with ease, Roosevelt was unsettled as he saw Japan becoming what can only be described as a potential threat. Under the treaty of Portsmouth in 1905, Japan gained Korea, south Manchuria and Sakhalin. He wanted the two nations to come together in piece. Relations only worsened between America and Japan because of racial incidences being brought up in American schools (against Japanese children). It was then that Roosevelt sent the Great White Fleet to underline America’s interest in the area. The Japanese gave a warm welcome to the ship and relations between the two nations began to bridge. This event almost fits in with his saying of speaking softly and carrying a big stick. His attempts to bring about peace got him a Nobel peace prize. Roosevelt was also famously renowned for the way he dealt with the Panama Canal situation. The canal was very sought after by Roosevelt. If he acquired the canal, American trading would have become much more sufficient and he would have paved the foundations for future imports and exports. Ferdinand De Lessops (architect of the Suez Canal), asks America if they want a stake in the project for $109 million. America declines the offer because it is way too much. In 1901, America gets exclusive access and the price is lowered to $40 million and America accepts. Columbians, however, want to renegotiate and so a revolution is begun by a canal worker supported by America! In the end, America got the Canal for $10 million and $1 million each year. It is heavily debated whether or not it was Roosevelt who started the revolution, however in years after his presidency he said “I stole the Canal”. It becomes quite clear that it was him who got the Canal worker to start the revolution. Although it may seem this is wrong and unjust for the acts of a president, it did get the US the canal; which helped immensely in the near future to come.

Join now!

     The second president was William Taft. He adopted the famous ‘Dollar Diplomacy’. He, just like Roosevelt, had planned to have an ongoing interest in foreign affairs. He firmly believed that co operation would go a lot further than the immediate reaction equipped by humans to use force. He believed the economic strength of America was enough to promote American interests. Hence the phrase, ‘Dollar Diplomacy’. This is where he and Roosevelt differed (largely). He actively encouraged and supported American overseas investments as he saw it in the sense that whatever profited American bankers and benefited the industrialists was ...

This is a preview of the whole essay