Religious Concerns solely explain the strong opposition to the Third Home Rule Bill. To what extent would you agree?
Michael Clark 14LH1
“Religious Concerns solely explain the strong opposition to the Third Home Rule Bill.” To what extent would you agree?
First of all I must start off with the introduction of the Third Home Rule Bill which happened in April 1912. The Bill consisted of two main points which would lead to the setting up of an Irish parliament which dealt with internal affairs such as education, transport and the like; however the police force and taxation were to excluded from the bill. Secondly the bill would allow the Irish public to elect forty MPs; their role would be to remain responsible for imperial and foreign policy of Ireland. The three groups for Home Rule introduction were the, Liberals, Labour and all the Irish parties, the groups against Home Rule were the Southern Unionists, the Ulster Unionists and the Conservatives. This suggests to me that religious concerns explain the strong opposition to HR, as it is evident that the Unionists, who obviously wanted to remain loyal to the crown, opposed the Bill; it seems to me that the Unionists are more worried about a defeat against Protestantism and Unionism, rather than a defeat to the Union itself. Although the Home Rule Bill does get passed in Westminster in September 1914, this obviously is during the period of the First World War, so the British and Irish agree to put it on the backburner until the end of the war. This in the long term becomes a victory for the British as the war lasts for four years and Redmond who had been so optimistic in September 1914, quickly became downhearted and it felt like a defeat to him.