• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

No Hitler: No Holocaust How far is this statement by the historian Michael Marrus accurate and comprehensive in attributing responsibility for the Final Solution?

Extracts from this document...


"No Hitler: No Holocaust" How far is this statement by the historian Michael Marrus accurate and comprehensive in attributing responsibility for the Final Solution? One of the greatest tragedies of the twentieth century is undoubtedly the mass annihilation of the Jews during the Holocaust, with over six million being killed between 1939 and 1945. But for whom can be held responsible for the Final Solution and therefore the Holocaust? Marrus's quote implies that without Hitler the Holocaust would not have occurred and post 1945 there has been a convenience to blaming Hitler also. However there are also other individuals and groups, such as the n**i elites, The SS and Einzatzgruppen and the German population, who to their own extent could be held responsible for the Holocaust too and therefore the full accuracy of this statement can be opposed. Context of the n**i State plays a huge role in assessing the full accuracy of this quote, including the n**i structure, decision making within the State, ideology and cumulative radicalisation. Whilst mentioning context of the n**i State, Germany during the 1930s faced economic and political problems (post world war 1) and saw a society desperate for structure, allowing a few minorities to suffer for the sake of the nation. Historians differ as to where the responsibility for the Holocaust lies. Intentionalist historians such as Lucy Dawidowicz argue that Hitler planned the extermination of the Jewish people from as early as 1918, and that he personally oversaw its execution. ...read more.


So therefore the elites responsibility can be seen only at an extent as they, although directly involved in most instances, were simply minipulating the state that Hitler was prividing them and were part of a system and process of their time. It could also be argued whether they were doing it at their own free will or because they felt fear within their own position. The n**i elites full responsibility can be seen again to an extent limited, because they were supported by the SS and Einzatzgruppen. A wide range of German soldiers and officials, were in some way involved in the Holocaust, from units of the SS and the Einzatzgruppen. The SS were and elite group full of enthusiasm and creativeness, and held responsibility within running the camps and extermination centres and though there was no single military unit in charge of the Holocaust, the SS under Himmler was the closest. From the SS came the Einzatzgruppen killing squads who, along with many other achievements, occupied East Europe and often went beyond their given orders. Both groups provided concentration camp guards, ran prison camps, helped form the ghettos and substantially used slave labour, all of which led up to the Holocaust and therefore adds to their part played within the responsibility for the Holocaust. They both also participated directly far more then any other group, including the Wehrmacht, or regular German army. ...read more.


Marrus's quote is not comprehensive but in someways to a certain extent it is accurate. Accurate in a sense that although Hitler was at a distance and indirectly involved in some circumstances, people on the front and directly involved, such as the Nazie elite, the SS and the Einzatzgruppen and ofcourse the German population, although working at their own free will on most occasions were working up to Hitler's ideology and therefore he is responsible. The assessments that have been drawn in this essay from the other groups involved, that could be all held responsible to their own extent, certainly mitigate against Hitler's own responsibility for the Holocaust, however each assessment reflected and linked back to Hitler, providing more evidence of Hitler's slightly higher level of responsibility. On the whole it can be seen that Hiler did not actually originate the details of policy and neither did he play a direct role within the n**i state, therefore Marrus's quote is not comprehensive in attributing responsibility for the Final Solution. His quote implies total responsibility for Hitler on the debate over the Final Solution when that is clearly not fully accurate as in contradiction to his quote is the evidence of other groups involved within the Holocaust and the views of different historians. In overall judgement, this statement by Marrus is to an extent accurate in attributing responsibility for the Final Solution, yet less comprehensive in doing so. Fiona Crookshank ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    nations emerged who fought against supposed threats from minority groups living within them. This included the Jews who were seen as aliens and extrinsic. It was against this backdrop that Wilhelm Marr, a German journalist, invented the phrase "anti-Semitism" in the 1870s.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    Jews reluctant to leave (could not take their assets out of Germany) + few countries willing to accept them Situation 1936-9 1936 Olympic Games - concerned that anti-Semitism might induce several countries to withdraw their teams, the government adopted a more moderate line.

  1. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    Flemming continues to argue that keywords from Wagner's work were commonplace in Hitler's speeches; words such as "elimination", "ridding" and "reduction". Again, his is a very tenuous link and can only be seen if you know what eventually happened. It can therefore be seen that Mein Kampf did not contain

  2. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    This document can be considered significant as it is taken directly from the party programme and its purpose is to outline their intentions as a political movement. Another piece of evidence that shows the presence of prejudice towards the Jews is document C which is an illustration of an Aryan

  1. The Holocaust

    Previously, anti-Jewish sentiment had been largely based on religion, but Marr's concept was focussed on biological descent. Marr thought that Jews had corrupted society, dominated business and ruled cultural life bringing about an ongoing struggle between the Jews and native Germans.

  2. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    * Racial harmony is promoted through the fair skinned, blonde haired children, soldiers and workers, who are feature prominently throughout the film: * In these ways the film has been considered as the propaganda film of all time - emphasizing the solidarity of the n**i Party, the unity of the

  1. Hitler's Willing Executioners - The role of Ordinary Germans during the Holocaust

    in 1933 when Hitler announced that the Jews were to be exterminated. Jews had been victims of destructive action for many centuries and this began in the fourth century in Rome after Christ. The Jews were forced to convert to Christianity but the Jews refused because they saw that "Christ

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Intentionalists not only stress Hitler?s anti-Semitic speeches and literature as a basis of annihilation but also emphasize the role of pre-existing anti-Semitism in German and European society. Daniel Goldhagen argues that ordinary Germans were willing participants in the Holocaust, which he claims had its roots in a deep eliminationist German anti-Semitism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work