• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The treaty of Versailles was shaped by French determination to exact revenge and to ensure Germanys permanent weakness How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...


'The treaty of Versailles was shaped by French determination to exact revenge and to ensure Germanys permanent weakness' How far do you agree with this view? World war one, one of the most destructive wars the world has ever faced, famous for trench warfare and along with it the unrelenting bombardment of the battlefields tearing countries and countless soldiers apart- this was in clearly a recipe for destruction. Inevitably, France, being the epicentre of the war along the western front, was ruined ruined; cities, towns, farms were destroyed in their thousands! From this, clearly France would be beyond hostile towards Germany as they were left with a destroyed landscape, and an unbelievably high death toll- understandably revenge was in just about every sane Frenchman's sights, especially when they saw a virtually untouched Germany. Was the treaty of Versailles shaped by French determination to exact revenge and to ensure Germanys permanent weakness? Or rather was it far more liberal than what the French wanted as the other nations in the big 3 had more input into the final draft of the treaty? ...read more.


Furthermore George was quoted saying 'squeeze them until the pips squeak' showing how he wanted utmost revenge and would try get as much out of Germany as possible, however the difference between the two was that Lloyd George wanted to destroy Germany 'within reason' whilst Clemenceau probably would've cast Germany back into the stone age if such was possible. However the reason why Britain didn't have such an extremist side as France was that Germany was seen as a valuable trading partner at the time (and Keynes, a brilliant economist of the time explained that by crippling the German economy it would thus cripple all of Europe's great economies leading to great depression- this stuck fear into Lloyd George and thus why he was more hesitant to cripple Germany than Clemenceau was). Furthermore Britain did not want to see France become the most powerful nation in Europe and lastly and most importantly it was France where the war effort did the most destruction so Britain wasn't effected nearly as much. Finally America, under Wilson was by far the most liberal of the three nations. ...read more.


intervene immediately, however this also backfired as both America and Britain both refused to sign the pact and America couldn't be seen to be signing secret treaties, and thus Britain wouldn't sign if America didn't! France was clearly left feeling hard done by, and although the treaty did provide them with lots of Clemenceau's aims, the French public felt what the treaty enforced was far too lenient, thus choosing to kick Clemenceau out of power showing how harsh thy treaty needed to be in their eyes- even thought they managed to crush Germany economically and monetarily they wanted to crush Germany further. In conclusion I feel that France did attempt to 'exact revenge and to ensure Germanys permanent weakness,' however it didn't not manage to shape the treaty to the extent it wanted, hence why Clemenceau was taken as a scapegoat and was evicted from power. I feel that Britain, being somewhat of the middle man managed to largely shape the treaty being able to pick and choose what they thought was best from American and French aims whilst adding points to their benefit. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    Sharp is hence correct in blaming the peacemakers because they should have been less "severe" in the way Germany is punished and less "lenient" in the way Versailles is implemented to prevent future conflict.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The president was old (he had been first elected in 1925 at the age of seventy-eight) and was easily persuaded by his advisers to pursue a new course because of the political stalemate . The president's state secretary, Otto Meissner, and other members of the state bureaucracy favored a change

  1. The Treaty of Versailles: Prelude to WWII

    wrongly accused Germany of being the sole cause of war, and this enabled the other clauses to be severe as she was now to pay for the whole of WWI. The second clause was that Germany had to disarm. The effects of this clause were: the army was to be

  2. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    Although the Ems telegram as this is called is the reason for the declaration of the war, it is relatively insignificant because it is the final straw in a long line of failures for France.

  1. The Treaty of Versailles was mainly intended as a punishment to cripple and humiliate ...

    Germany had always been striving for a bigger and more powerful country. In the years leading up to the war they had become strong with a Navy almost beating Britain?s respected and cherished fleet, a growing army and an empire they had always strived for.

  2. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    Because they had no income they could not afford to buy food and so had to queue for free supplies. There is also a pro-Hitler piece of graffiti on the wall behind the queue. We can infer that this would have been an attempt to gain support from the unsatisfied and irate unemployed, of which there were many.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work