To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible task?

Authors Avatar

‘To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible task?’

        Although the Romanov Dynasty had ruled Russia for over 300 years, once its demise had begun it took only a few days for Tsardom to fall. Immediately after this collapse the whole country seemed to breathe a sigh of relief as it entered into a ‘honeymoon’ period during which time exuberance and celebration was rife throughout Russia. However, the fact remained that although hopes and expectations were high regarding how Russia’s new government could better the lives of the Russian people and the future of Russia itself, the new Provisional Government still had to face those same problems that the Tsarist government had failed to solve; such as the ever deteriorating economy, the social unrest and the diabolical living standards in the towns and cities, all of which were exacerbated by Russia’s involvement in the war. The newly formed Provisional Government also had problems of its own to face, such as its controversial claims to legitimacy and the threat posed to it by the possible return of some of Russia’s most dangerous and influential exiles. Some historians believe that the Provisional Government faced an impossible task, due to the troubles it inherited but also due to the mistakes that the Provisional Government itself made which worsened the condition of the task they faced. Given these circumstances then, it is perhaps not surprising that the Provisional Government struggled to deliver what was expected and it has even been argued that when the Provisional Government took control over Russia it inherited a ‘poison chalice’, but to what extent is this the case and to what extent did the Provisional Government themselves contribute to making their own task impossible?

        The sheer difficulty of the task facing the new Provisional Government was made worse upon its formation; when the Provisional Government was experiencing its first hours in power. The Provisional Government was made up entirely of middle and upper class members, most of whom were freemasons, meaning they were happy to help each other out but not so happy to look out for anybody outside their new government. This meant that they were not very democratic; a fault which immediately struck a chord in the hearts and minds of those Russians who had so apposed the Romanov Dynasty’s autocratic rule and who were desperate for democracy, because to them it seemed that although the Provisional Government was barely hours old, it held already an air of being a product of the old regime.

The fact that the Provisional Government was made up of the bourgeoisie and the upper classes also created another very early onset problem for them, as in this one move they managed to alienate the majority of the Russian population. In 1917 over 80% of Russia was made up of peasants, which meant that the new Provisional Government was out of touch with the majority of Russia. This lead to an increase in the difficulty of the task facing the Provisional Government as the lower classes were immediately resentful towards them, making them less likely to accept the leadership of the Provisional Government and therefore more likely to rebel against it, a great worry for the Provisional Government as although the lower classes and peasantry had little legal status, they were indeed the masses and therefore physical rebellion if posed by them would be definite threat to the Provisional Government.

Join now!

Another factor which increased the extent to which the Provisional Government faced an impossible task, was the fact that as well as being completely out of touch and unrepresentative of the majority of the Russian population the Provisional Government, as an unelected body, lacked legitimacy. This was a difficult problem to tackle and it proved an important factor in the downfall of the Provisional Government. Rather than being elected, the government had in fact come into being as a rebellious committee of the old Duma, who had refused to dissolve at the tsar’s orders, meaning that it lacked legitimate authority. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay