• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'A religious settlement of her own choosing'. How far is this an accurate view of the settlement of the Church of England under Elizabeth I?

Extracts from this document...


Alex Jockelson 'A religious settlement of her own choosing'. How far is this an accurate view of the settlement of the Church of England under Elizabeth I? The debate has arisen as to whether the Elizabethan religious settlement was actually an accurate reflection of the monarch's true desires or that, in contrast, Elizabeth was pressurised into a decision that she was not altogether content with. Both views have their downfalls but whilst it is hard to convince us that Elizabeth found the settlement altogether agreeable, there is no doubt that she intended from the start to restore royal authority over the Church and probably wished to introduce a Protestant service of some kind, though of what kind is unclear. Elizabeth had been tutored by Protestants, and she never seriously considered maintaining Catholicism as the national religion. Denouncing Protestantism would have been disloyal to her parents, her friends, and her beliefs. The only question was how quickly she would seek to reinstate Protestantism, but this was a question requiring very serious consideration - Elizabeth needed to remain secure on her new throne, and Protestant leanings had the chance of aggravating the powerful Spanish. ...read more.


The Lords passed the Uniformity bill only 21 to 18, and Elizabeth had imprisoned two Bishops because she suspected they would have voted against the bill. One was also mysteriously absent, and between them these three could have forced a draw in the Lords. The Commons had passed it easily. Elizabeth had introduced these Acts but was the final settlement planned by the Crown or forced upon it by political pressures? The near-contemporary account of William Camden described the settlement as the successful outcome of royal policy formed before Parliament assembled and set out in a document known as 'The Device for the Alteration of Religion'. Dr N.L. Jones also shares this view and has argued that the settlement which emerged in 1559 was essentially what Elizabeth wanted and evidence for it can be found in the document. The 'Device' answered certain questions about the best method to reintroduce the supremacy and alter religion. Written in response to a request from the government, it also makes it clear that a prayer book would be the vehicle for the new uniformity and because it did not distinguish between the books of 1549 and 1552 it is reasonable to assume that the later (the one last in force before Catholic restoration) ...read more.


It is, however, easy to criticize this view and therefore support the idea that the religious settlement was indeed Elizabeth's own choosing. Firstly, once the settlement was established Elizabeth rejected any further desire to reform which suggests she was perfectly happy with the settlement she had instigated. Secondly, if Dr Jones is right and there was indeed no radical Protestant opposition to the crown in 1559 than Neale's picture of such an opposition during the 1560s, that which he sees deriving from the events of 1559, must be questioned. Lastly, Neale's view exaggerates the role of the Protestants whilst at the same time underestimating the great resistance and influence from the Lord's which nearly foiled Elizabeth's plans in passing the Act of Uniformity. The Queen could not instigate her policies without plenty of difficulty and it may be true that she was required to rethink some of her original intentions. However, the real confrontation was between Crown and Lords, and between Lords and Commons, not between Crown and Commons. It is therefore accurate to suggest that the religious settlement was indeed of her own choosing as she played the lead role in its consultation, compromise and adjustment. The input and opinion of substantial groups in Court, Council, Parliament and Clergy in achieving a lasting outcome was indeed just that. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Elizabeth I: There is much debate amongst historians concerning the religious priorities of Elizabeth ...

    4 star(s)

    Indeed she had good reason to, as the Bills of Supremacy and Uniformity making up the Settlement were torn to pieces by the Marian bishops and Catholic peers, although having already passed the Commons. In retaliation to Elizabeth's Bill of Supremacy which gave Elizabeth the title of 'Supreme Head' of

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    could not possibly ignore' and that 'Cartwright's expulsion did not check the puritan revolt, since he had only put into clear terms what many people were already thinking'. One year later John Field published his Admonitions to Parliament - he was a Puritan clergyman who wanted a Presbyterian church and believed Bishops were enemies to Christianity.

  1. Using all the sources, and your own knowledge, assess to what extent the Church ...

    The Reformation Bill had been passed through Parliament, and contemporaries ad believed that the Church was governed by the Queen and Parliament. However others see Elizabeth and a monarch who made the decisions and used Parliament simply as a way to pass her changes.

  2. Meddling and troublesome(TM)- how accurate a description is this of Elizabeth I(TM)s parliaments?

    any of her Privy council or MPs), and they sent Elizabeth a petition regarding marriage and succession. Their attempt to persuade her into marriage was not met with any desire for discussion. Her reply was "At present it is not convenient; nor shall be without some peril unto you and certain danger unto me".

  1. To what extent was the Elizabethan Church Settlement of 1559 - 66 motivated more ...

    The First Fruits and Tenths Act of 1559 allowed Elizabeth much needed revenue without increasing taxes on the laity. The Act of Exchange also passed in 1559 gave Elizabeth the right to take over the property once held by bishops.

  2. coursework on Elizabeth I

    Francis Drake went a step further that Hawkins when making voyages to the Spanish colonies. From 1577 to 1580 he made voyages to attack Spanish colonies and from these attacks he captured huge quantities of gold, silver and jewels. These actions would have pleased Queen Elizabeth, although she may not

  1. Causes and Consequences of the Elizabethan Settlement

    This later caused the Church to further clarify the Settlement by producing the 39 Articles of 1563. A political and religious short term negative impact was the best of the lesser clergy resigning because it caused shortage of properly qualified clergy.

  2. Asses the main influences which determined the Elizabethan Church Settlement in 1559

    Changes to the Prayer Book, along with the Act of Supremacy and the Act of Uniformity were able to pass through Parliament, with thanks to Elizabeth?s Privy Council; and namely, William Cecil. Cecil was known to be Elizabeth?s favourite minister, and he had contributed more towards the settlement than any

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work