Kane      

Allen Ginsberg was born into social confusion.  He was jewish, gay, and his mother was a communist.  Yet outside of this, he was also birthed within a generation that wallowed in chaos, both morally and emotionally. Before them had come the Industrial Revolution, which had begun the murder of “unity or wholeness” in American society; assembly lines and the breakdown of the workplace into “distinct and separable parts” had fragmented both the individual and the family.  Yet it was the bomb that truly brought the deafening crush on American psycha, minimalizing mechanical wonders and becoming “the first true “human” leap in the intelligent understanding of how to control and shape the environment  (Henrikson  xi).  However, to Ginsberg and others, nothing was closer to the anti thesis of  the concept of human.  Their parents had numbed themselves in order to adapt to the depression and two world wars, forcing them to rationalize the reality of post-war America with apathy and materialism and the empty values of consumerism.  Ginsberg refused to believe this was the way of the world and began to write about a new generation who had placed new definitions in place of old notions that no longer applied.  He and other writers began a  

        To Allen Ginsberg, the problem was that in society the existence of the individual in isolation was naturally “more real” than society in general, as “collective society has an awesome control over people that transcends their individual wills.” (Merril 3)  The bomb then was a symbol of this control, essentially bounding people to a future under fear, under which they would strip themselves of their purely human emotions in order to cope with the day.  In a world “where mainstream television told you how to be and Mcarthyism told you what not to be”, Ginsberg believed the individual’s only answer was only looking inwards oneself where they couldn’t reach through the boundaries of externals (Wooley).  His age would be on a spiritual quest, but to embark on it they would need a new religion for a new day; modern religion could no longer do as “good and evil and evil seemed increasingly inadequate in a world of science fiction turned fact” (Ziegler 172).  The beat therefore found their religion in Zen Buddhism for one central reason: both sides of good and evil were embraced in “oneness” for the individual in the meditation where spontaneous flashes of images and sights might come ( Merill 7).  In this religion, nothing the human being was impulsed to perform could be wrong as what was right was instinctual and natural.  To sustain their humanity in a world gone mad, man had to embrace every emotion he felt as “exploiting these feelings..[led them] to new levels of truth”  (Merill 2). This was the concept of the ying and the yang ; taking on all forces no matter how panicked or manic in coherence with nature.

It is in this particular religious ideology and other forms of explicit verbal attacks that characterize Ginsberg’s first acknowledged work, Howl.  The content of the book leaves no mystery to why it became so controversial; Ginsberg refuses to deny any schema of thought, most noticeably in the sexuality department.  If had he had censored these thoughts, it would have equated to admitting that sexual behavior was unhealthy and unnatural; “this expression [was] the denial of shame itself” and represented the embrace of his full humanity (Merill  2).  But to truly understand the work, one has to imagine themselves in the context of the Six Gallery group of San Francisco poets it was performed before, as its recitation was the first of many performances that would eventually make Ginsberg “largely responsibible for the movement of the poet from the printed page to the reading halls  (Schumaker   635).  One must imagine the situation , because it is in the visual that one can get the feeling of it , of the beat of the music, of the beat of the scene, of the swelling chests and rising spirits of “culture [surviving] despite the presence of an oppressive national political environment” (Schumaker 214).  The mood can only be fully set if the voice of Ginsberg is imagined in a somewhat nervous tone, unsure of the response he will garner as he exalts the individual and their inherent potential for goodness outside of the society , saying “Holy! The soul is holy! The skin is holy! The tongue and cock and hand and asshole holy!  Everything is holy!”    The “boos, hisses,[claps]” of the crowd must be invoked upon the introduction the deity of death known as Moloch who is a direct contrast to the pure human existence (Schumaker   217)  The nervousness and dread should be present alongside his description: “Mind [of] pure machinery..whose blood is running money..whose fingers are ten armies..whose ear is a smoking tomb....demonic industries!!..granite cocks!!...monstrous bombs!”  Moloch is responsible for taking away the instincts of the people that would bring them happiness as he “bashed open their skulls and ate up their brains and imagination”  (Henrikson #).  Yet among this distinction of conflict, the presentation of unity and aforementioned “one-ness” of Zen can be seen in Ginsberg’s portrayal of optimistic youth and its convergence with drugs and various arrays of emotions. Words are infused with the surge of the crowd as there are “the angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the night”,  similar to “a lost battalion of platonic conversationalists jumping..off windowsills off Empire State”, and equal to those “who vanished into nowhere Zen New Jersey… [loning it] through the streets of Idaho seeking visionary Indian angels”.  These descriptions exalt the individual who absorbs his uncertainty and doubt and lets it take him anywhere in his hunt for spirituality, in an ethereal surreal showing of human purity described in a gritty confessional style latent with acid tripped tongues between lips and roses on the ends of declarations. They also know no form, as Ginsberg says each is “a breath”, a flurry of emotion representative the human exhaling against “conventional society” and its brutal and constraining tendencies as represented through Moloch  (Merill 23)  Ginsberg essentially takes the amalgamation of drugs, obscenity, explicit sexual imagery and “hysterical/naked” tendencies of his people and compares them to the oblique characteristics of Moloch and the “boys sobbing in armies” by his side, massive like red revolution but subverted to a nationalistic mantra, cut like concrete on warm warring flesh wishing they could feel like the battleground if it had a heartbeat with organs cut away at three crosses to celebrate the mythic religion when Jesus the baby birthed in love consideration and carnal compassion was felt by his mother; of the two, the blatant and overt obscenities of the steel machine were much more Frankenstein-esque  in offensiveness and horror than the words of the skin, of frantic nude protests laced like bluesy Saturday night agony tunes.  To bring America to this reality, Ginsberg uses the painful recognition of “seeing the best minds of his time ..destroyed by madness”, emblematic of his lover Carl Solomon being institutionalized after suffering from the noxious consumerist tones of nuclear America  (Schumaker  208). Taking all of madness in within himself, the poet summarizes his response to all of this with the single line “FUCK AMERICA AND ATOM BOMB”.  It is symbolic of his overall explicit nature in protest, such as his later poetry which boasted of “cocksucking” in front of French cathedrals and standing out in aristocratic French scenes penning Death to Van Ghohs Ear (Campbell NUMBER). Ginsberg not only felt this came naturally but felt it was as the new necessity.  America needed to be shocked in order to be allured to these works or poetry, which went deeper than blatant sexuality; emotion energy sex love mysticism were all on the same plane of internal mental thought.  Avant garde display was now the means to the end of snapping sensually the industrialized human machine, over-fixated on temporary addiction to a set of materialistic values that came with carnage caved in at the ends of seventeen year old love letters where the blood started to run in the rain and the words and signatures were incomprehensible but the dog tags shined like Sunday morning breakfasts baked in sweet bread and kisses from Grandpa Cookie. It was this unconventional fragmented style of verse that caused mothers to cry when kids read about freedom and a world not burgeoning with the moral and physical suicides of a thousand possibilities in a nuclear haze. They’d imagine such lines would be a threat to a child, who might become like Dylan acid trip epics with Quinny dosing and skys opening for brief seconds where you can taste and feel “it”, the thing that makes us “mad” and “burn burn burn” with hope at the edge of tongues  (Dylan)(Kerouac  ). Folk heroes proclaimed that children would become “beyond their command”, the command of authority figures etched in the physical and moral apathy of the bomb.  People were listening.

Join now!

With Howl, Ginsberg set down a formula for later protest songs from the likes of Joan Baez :the obscenities of the state should be followed by the uncontrollable and instinctual emotional reactions of the individual.  Such muses from the heart and mind about the existence of the new sort of rain coming down and the boy who disappeared in it could be easily invoked in the depths of the subconscious stalled in meditation. As poet Michael Mcclure said after Howl’s first recitation, “none of us wanted to go back to the gray, chill, militaristic silence-to the land without poetry-to the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay