• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period 1855-1964.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the reasons why opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the period 1855-1964. In 1855, opposition to the Tsarist regime lacked an effective unifying ideology. This remained the case throughout the 1855-1964 period, even once the communists had seized power. The lack of unity opposition possessed was a key factor in its failure throughout the period. Division in opinion and ideology were consistent problems for opposition, which only fully united in the February revolution. Even then there were still divisions in opinion, however there was one common cause to unite behind. Other attributing factors such as heavy repression by rulers, well timed reforms and the continuing use of military force ultimately meant that opposition to Russian Governments was rarely successful in the 1855-1964. The peasantry were consistent opponents of Russian Government throughout the period, yet were rarely successful in doing so. One reason for this is the continuing role which the army played in limiting opposition from the peasantry, with military force frequently being deployed throughout the period. Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies and Stalin used a similar style of brute force during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. ...read more.


Military force was continually employed by the state, with Lenin crushing the Kronstadt mutiny in a similar effect to the Lena Goldfields massacre of 1912 and b****y Sunday. The workers were controlled by the state throughout the period with Stalin's 5 year plans continuing the military discipline in the workplace which Lenin had introduced. Strikes under Alexander III in the 1880's did little to influence state policy. The revolutionary groups which became prominent in the 1870's lacked a unifying cause much like the peasantry and this often resulted in continual separation and division which limited their effectiveness. The Social Democrats had split into the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks in the same way that Land and Liberty had previously split into the Black Repartition and the People's Will. Again, these domestic opponents did enjoy some success. Not just the 1917 revolution, but also the concessions made in the October Manifesto and the assassination of Alexander II by the People's Will. All shared a common theme in that they were successes in the short term, but did not go according to plan in the long term. The deposition of the Provisional Government removed any possibility of a democratic Russia and the assassination had previously removed any chance of a constitutional monarchy. ...read more.


The threat of death, exile and imprisonment was used by the Russian state throughout the period, with Lenin intensifying Tsarist repression following a brief relaxation in Nicholas II's 1905 concessions. The failure of the Kronstadt mutiny demonstrated communist intolerance for opposition which Stalin would go on to intensify. Despite relaxation under Khrushchev, Stalinist repression had wiped out any opponents with similar effect to Alexander III and Lenin's use of the Okhrana and Cheka respectively. Unlike Tsarist Governments where repression had provoked opposition and increased tensions, repression and clever use of propaganda under communist Governments removed any possibility of opposition succeeding. Opposition to Russian Governments throughout the 1855-1964 period was rarely successful, whether it came from the peasantry, the intelligentsia, the workers or overseas. Heavy use of repression and the continuing deployment of military force were key factors, as was the clever use of propaganda by communist Governments in particular, such as the cult of Stalin. Even when opposition to Russian Government had succeeded, such as the removal of Nicholas II and the Provisional Government or the assassination of Alexander II, the events that followed were not successes as opponents had hoped for. In addition to Government intervention and reform, opposition consistently lacked a shared ideology and a common cause, so it was rarely successful throughout the 1855-1964 period. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    However Stalin and Khrushchev can be seen as similar as both leaders employed "cunning"8 and spin-doctoring. But there are clear differences, as Khrushchev lacked the temperamental nature of Stalin and the Tsars. He claimed Stalin was a "litsedi" meaning a man of many faces9, therefore there is a parallel between

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies and Stalin used a similar style of brute force during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. Tsars had also used military force in containing the peasantry, with Stolypin's necktie under Nicholas II and Alexander II continually employing military force prior to the Emancipation Act.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * The omens did not look favourable. Once, Napoleon's Grand Armee ahd relied on speed and mobility. With no roads and with supply routes blocked by deserters and corpses, the French lines were quickly stretched. 1. Hunger and disease slowed the army, which already had no forage for supplies. 2.

  2. Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful ...

    This was not the case under the communists which allowed their regimes to eliminate potential threats quick and painlessly. Opponents to the crown succeeded because Nicholas II had lost the support of the army, whereas Lenin was able to defend his revolution in the Civil War because the army remained loyal to him.

  1. How effective was opposition to Russian government during the period 1855-1964?

    The first main success of political opposition is widely considered to be the assassination of Alexander II at the hands of the People?s Will in 1881. Although assassinating the Emperor is an extraordinary feat it is hotly debated whether or not this event helped the opposition achieve their aims (presumably greater political freedom/democracy).

  2. Assess the reasons why opponents of Russian governments were rarely successful in the period ...

    Another example is the failing of the Narodnik or the ?going to the people movement? of 1877 orchestrated by the populists who failed mainly due to the fact that there was never a strong enough leader in place to achieve their aims.

  1. Opposition to Russian governments was ineffective in the period from 1855 to 1964. How ...

    The rest of Tsar Nicholas II?s reign saw relatively little opposition until 1917 when Russia?s involvement in the First World War was slowly bringing the country to its knees. Defeat looked inevitable and as a result the Tsar abdicated in February 1917.

  2. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    On balance, whilst Alexander II took the first necessary steps to modernisation, and Stolypin under Nicholas II dealt with the neglected yet vital area of agriculture, it was Witte who had the largest and longest impact on the economy. In spite of the fact that he and his policies hung

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work