• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the relative importance of the reasons why the July 1944 Bomb Plot to assassinate Hitler was unsuccessful

Extracts from this document...


Assess the relative importance of the reasons why the July 1944 Bomb Plot to assassinate Hitler was unsuccessful. This question focuses on an evaluation of the significant factors that resulted in a failed coup d'etat, which involved an attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler on the 20th July 1944. For the purpose of this essay a coup d'etat may be interpreted as; ' a sudden overthrowing of government and seizure of power by others' and assessing the 'relative importance' refers to evaluating the weight of factors in comparison to one another. In order to assess the relative importance of the reasons for the unsuccessful event, it is essential to consider the failure to eliminate Hitler, the failure to cut off the Wolfsschanze (Wolf's Lair) from Berlin, the difficulties of communication for the plotters in a police state, the lack of unity amongst opponents of the Nazi regime, the impact of the army oath of loyalty to Hitler, the effect of the systems of Gleichschaaltung, Germany at war making opposition hopeless, and finally other factors involved in the failure of the Bomb Plot. However before assessing these possible factors causing failure, it is necessary to outline the background to the July, 1944, Bomb Plot. By 1944 the war had turned crucially in favour of the allies and as a result, the German High Commanders thought it fundamental that the war be brought to an end as soon as possible. A plan was devised, primarily to assassinate Hitler, neutralise the SS and the remains of the Nazi leadership and to finally replace the existing government with a provisional one, with powers to hopefully end the war through negotiation. The conspirators involved in the plot were a group of high-ranking Wehrmacht officers serving on the Russian front, they key leaders including Henning von Tresckow, Friedrich Olbricht and Karl von Stulpnagel. However it was Claus von Stauffenberg in particular who gave the plotters a sense of moral purpose and the enthusiasm needed in order for it to have a chance of success. ...read more.


Moreover the German police state was decidedly effective in eliminating opposition at all levels of society. For example, this is indicated by the arrest of von Moltke in January 1944, a key leader in the Kreisau Circle to which von Stauffenberg had become attached. A further problem was the conspirator's inability to gain the support of any outstanding frontline commanders in the major German cities and consequently the conspirators based in Berlin came to be of crucial importance.9 Through methods of consolidation power, the mixture of legality and violence, of authoritarian powers from above and the Nazi revolution from below, Hitler established his dictatorship so that by late 1934 it was impossible to remove him legally. Subsequently Hitler was able to keep power through genuine support for successful policies, through propaganda and indoctrination and through systems of repression. Consequently, there was a lack of widespread opposition to the Nazi regime and what opposition evolved was largely ineffective for a number of reasons. Political opposition was divided between left and right and within the left KPD and SPD parties. There was also a crucial underestimation of Nazi power potential from both political elites and from the other popular parties of the centre and left who believed that Fascism would not last and that Hitler could be manipulated in the meantime. Thus, whilst there was a wide variety of opposition to the Nazi regime, the number of actual registers was small and their aims and methods were uncoordinated This crucial lack of unity, the isolation of opposition groups, meant that the Nazi regime was secure and was only brought down by the vast coalition of enemy powers.10 For example, the July 1944 Bomb Plot resulted from a military conspiracy, (which involved two long-established civilian underground groups, which had contrasting political aims.) in the background of which stood two long-established civilian underground groups, but which differed in their political aims. ...read more.


Tresckow put the matter succinctly when he told von Stauffenberg: 'the assassination must be attempted.... Even if it fails, we must take action in Berlin. For the practical purpose no longer matters; what natters now is that the German resistance movement must take the plunge before the eyes of the world and of history. Compared to that nothing else matters.29 1 Heinrich Fraenkel The July Plot, 1966 2 Ian Kershaw, Hitler 1936-1945 Nemesis, 2000, pg 676-679 3 Alan Bullock, Hitler - a Study in Tyranny, 1952, pg 744-751 4 Gitta Sereny, Albert Speer: His Battle with Truth, 1995 pg 445 5 Joachim Fest, Hitler, 1973, pg 711 6 Peter Hoffmann, The History of the German Resistance, 1933-1945, 1966 7 As recorded in a BBC monitoring Report of 21st July 1944 8 D. G. Williamson, The Third Reich, 2002, pg 122-123 9 Jackson J. Spielvogel, Hitler and Nazi Germany, 1992 10 John Hite and Chris Hinton, Weimar and Nazi Germany, 2000 11 Michael Bloch, Ribbentrop, 1992, pg 440-441 12 David Evans and Jane Jenkins, Years of Weimar and the Third Reich, 1999............... 13 Joachim Fest, Plotting Hitler's Death, 1994 14 Louis L. Snyder, Encyclopaedia of the Third Reich, 1976 15 Jackson J. Spielvogel, Hitler and Nazi Germany, 1992 16 Based in detail provided in the guide to the Plotzensee Memorial, 1973 17 Michael Burliegh, The Third Reich, 2000, pg 714-716 18 Heinrich Fraenkel, The July Plot, 1966 19 Ian Kershaw, The Hitler Myth- Image and reality in the Third Reich, 1987, pg 215 20 D. G Williamson, The Third Reich, 2002, pg 122-123 21 Joachim Fest, Plotting Hitler's Death, 1994 22 A recorded in a BBC Monitoring Report of 21st July 1944 23 Joachim Fest, Hitler, 1973, pg 709 24 David Evans and Jane Jenkins, Years of Weimar and the Third Reich, 1999 25 Heinz Guderian, Panzer Leader, 1953 26 ??? Ian Kershaw, Hitler 1936-1945 - Nemesis, 2000, pg 676-679 27 Gitta Seremy, Albert Speer:His Battle with Truth, 1995, pg 445 28 John Weitz, Hitler's Banker-Schacht, 1997, pg 284 29 Michael Burliegh, The Third Reich, 2000, pg 714-716 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * Tsar Alexander now saw himself as the saviour of Europe. He believed he had a Christian mission to complete the defeat of Napoleon and to free Europe from tyranny. * Under his leadership, the Fourth Coalition, initially composed of Russia, Prussia and Britain, was formed in 1813.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    More money spent on arms = boom late 1930s. Who benefited from Nazi Economic Policies? Proletariat Worker's real wages were lower in 1938 than they had been since 1928, but by late 1930s most workers were better off than in 1932. German Labour Front improved working conditions - 'beauty of work programme', 'strength through joy' provided variety of activities

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Hitler, ever fearful of army suppression of the movement, rejected any illegal action. Hitler believed that the Nazis still occupied a good position. The Nazis and Communists now made up 52 percent of the Reichstag. Although these extremist parties of the left and the right would never make a coalition government, they could essentially cripple the parliamentary system.

  2. "Foreign success; domestic failure." How fair is this summary of Bismarck's governance of Germany

    Bismarck took action by persuading the Vatican and the German bishops to withdraw support from the Centre Party, only realising by 1872, that his attempts had failed did he sever diplomatic relations with the Vatican and intensify the campaign against the Catholic Church, with intentions to subordinate Church to state.

  1. Why did Hindenburg appoint Hitler as Chancellor in 1933?

    The Nazis wanted to help small businesses (as in the poster on the right) and the fact that Marxism and communism was going to help big businesses rather than like Nazi, help small tradesmen. They were able to criticise other campaigns in order to gain votes.

  2. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    Nazi Party after hearing someone such as Hitler, a decisive, well spoken and clever politician of the time, talk. Due to Speer?s lack of ethics and morals he wouldn?t have realised when he crossed between good and evil and soon, ?Hitler?s world quickly became Speer?s world?[13].

  1. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    There is no doubt that all who attended the meeting knew that the mass-destruction of the Jewish people in Europe had been common practise, the meeting was not to discuss whether to carry out murder, but rather how to carry out the murder.

  2. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    But the economy is a huge factor as Overy's correlation argument suggests that the years when the economy failed (1942 to 1943) the war effort failed; but as the economy improved, the war effort did, too. There was increased productivity in the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work