Australia does not follow a “tradition of impulsive involvement in international conflict regardless of the nation’s state of preparedness”.

Authors Avatar

My hypothesis is that Australia does not follow a “tradition of impulsive involvement in international conflict regardless of the nation’s state of preparedness”.  Australia had extremely close ties with Britain and felt a duty to the “mother land” which it fulfilled twice following the out break of two major conflicts.  It was bound by foreign policy to enter WW1and WW2 and to fight to defend the empire.  In our next major conflict, Vietnam, Australia gave support to America due to our eagerness for them to stop the spread of communism.  In all involvements Australia’s military earnt a fine reputation, and until Vietnam, enjoyed considerable support from home.

  Australia’s military manpower at the time was not strong, but when WW1 began people rushed to enlist and go on an adventure.

  It has been recorded that Australia prepared for only six weeks for the expected outbreak of WW1, however this is not true.  Australia began planning and preparing for the out break of war (expected to start in 1915), in June 1911,  after a conference in London.  The Australian Prime Minister, Andrew Fisher, gave an assurance that an Australian expeditionary force would be ready to fight with Britain in the opening battles of the war.

  Australia’s first contingent of 12 000 men,  was extremely well prepared.  It was said that “No troops ever went to the front more generously equipped than the Australian first contingent” (Mordake, 1992:xvi).  This was the product of the 3 years of planning and preparing.

  All of the above was kept secret from the public, due to the opposition it was feared it might cause in Australia.  As a cover story for the preparation, the government said it was all necessary to defend Australia from Japan, no mention was made of the looming crisis in Europe.

Join now!

  The Australians’ resourcefulness and frontier qualities

made them top class fighters.  As desert fighters the Australian Light Horse were excellent, and had no equal.  In fact it is commonly said that, apart from Gallipoli, wherever Australian troops went they conquered.  They were responsible for breaking the Western front and putting Turkey out of the war by controlling the desert.

 Back in Australia, home guard units were not properly outfitted.  Commonly they did not have enough ammunition, boots or uniforms.

  Unfortunately between the wars Australia’s military  standards were allowed to slip.  The tactics of trench warfare (WW1) ...

This is a preview of the whole essay