Charles V - An Evaluation Of Success And Failures.

Authors Avatar
Charles V – An Evaluation Of Success And Failures Charles’ Success In Governing The Empire Arguably, Charles V could be considered as successful in governing the Empire, as he attempted to improve and centralise government within each part of his Empire. As Charles had to reduce hostility to his government and gain acceptance for his new taxes, a number of reforms were adopted, including the replacement of unpopular of corrupt officials. The Cortes was also allowed to partnership with the Crown and in return for taxes, it was responsible for handling revenue. A partnership was also affected with the nobility. They were rewarded by being confirmed in their social position and privileges, form the government of Spain. The price of this exclusion was that the nobility was allowed to govern the countryside with very little interference. Peace was brought to Castile but at considerable cost, with severe limitations on central policy and on the Crown’s ability to make changes. However, with a compliant Cortes, Charles could afford a standing army and was less dependant on the power of the nobles. Finally, although Charles continued with the conciliar system of government, he did extend its role to new areas. For instance, the Council of State, created in 1522 dealt with the affairs of both Spain and the Holy Roman Empire. Charles was also able to maintain personal control and historian J.J. Elliot notes that Charles was ‘”an old style ruler who liked to lead his army to battle and to govern his subjects personally”.Charles’ Failures In Governing The EmpireHe failed in
Join now!
his attempts to centralise government in Germany, as there were no long-term effects as a result of his actions. Throughout Charles' reign there was a need for central direction and co-ordination of policies, although it could also be argued that the Spanish Empire had no institutions in common and no imperial bureaucracy. Any attempt at reform of the administration had to take account of the privileges of each territory and also the prolonged absence of the Emperor. Finally, it could be put forward that Charles found it difficult to impose his authority as a territorial ruler. Historian N.M. Sutherland stated ...

This is a preview of the whole essay