-
War of the unstamped Radical papers and pamphlets had been vital in spreading the radical message throughout post war radicalism (1815-19) The Whigs brought in a legislation that tightened up the stamp duty charged on publications. They reduced the stamp duties but ensured that this policy was enacted across the country. The working class radicals saw this as a tax on knowledge. This policy played a vital role in politicising many of the later Chartists e.g. George Julian Harney sold papers illegally in the war of the unstamped.
-
Factory Reform- the conditions in the factories were appalling. Ten Hour movement popular in Yorkshire- campaigned for shorter hours. 1833 Factory Act left hours unaltered.
Richard Brown- "The frustrated factory reformers swelled the rising Chartist tide and many of the northern delegates of the Chartist Convention in 1839 had initially entered politics through the ten hour movement."
-
New Poor Law- Arguably least popular of the Whig policies.
1834 Poor Law Amendment Act- reduced cost of relief by introducing stringent workhouse test.
The poor could no longer receive outdoor relief in their own homes- they had to move to the workhouse.
Widespread protest in rural and industrial north- the workhouse became symbol of Whig cruelty.
Late 1836- began to introduce Poor Law north of Trent- bitter opposition.
Leaders- Richard Oastler, Fergus O'Connor, Joseph Raynor Stephens, and Henry Hetherington
Poor Law introduced at time of economic decline- stories spread of savage workhouses.
- Trade Union activity
Trade unionists at end of 1830's began to attribute problems to single cause- unreformed parliament. see R.Brown p15-16
Conclusion
-
Many people were members of all the campaigns- you could be involved in the war of the unstamped, factory campaign and Trade Union movement- they were not mutually exclusive.
-
Economic depression at the end of the 1830's provided the fuel for this discontent. This triggered an anti Whig sentiment and a demand for an improvement. The problems though had a political dimension- they appeared to be linked to the unreformed parliament.
- These economic problems linked into the wider tradition of English radicalism.
First Phase- 1837-40
1837
- January Poor Law Commissioners start to implement their policies in the north of England
East London Democratic Association formed
-
28 February First public meeting of LWMA held at Crown and Anchor Tavern in the Strand. Petition to House of Commons adopted
- March First LWMA missionary sent to provinces
Widespread industrial unrest
Also throughout year the formation of Anti-Poor Law Associations in Yorkshire and Lancashire. Demonstrations and meetings addressed by O'Connor, Oastler, Stephens.
-
April Glasgow Cotton Spinners strike May Revival of Birmingham Political Union [BPU] 19
-
June Meeting summoned by BPU decides to petition Parliament for currency reform and universal suffrage
-
May/June Conference between members of LWMA and group of radical MP's. Committee appointed to draw up a bill embodying the six points for presentation to Parliament
-
November First issue of Northern Star in Leeds December Leaders of Glasgow cotton spinners strike found guilty on charges of conspiracy, arson, assault and murder
1838
-
May `People's Charter' published in London National Petition published in Birmingham
- June Great Northern Union formed at Leeds
Northern Political Union founded at Newcastle
-
From May through September a series of mass meetings were held to present the Charter and elect delegates to the proposed National Convention. At Glasgow in May a claim was made to a crowd of 150,000; in Birmingham in August to one of 200,00; in September at Kersal Moor near Manchester to one of 250,000.
1839
- February The General Convention of the Industrious Classes met in London March Formation of Anti-Corn Law League [ACLL]
- April Sir Charles Napier appointed to command of northern military district
- May Convention moved to Birmingham; National Petition with 1,280,000 signatures given to Attwood and Fielden; Convention Manifesto issued, asking for consideration of eight forms of "ulterior measures" to be taken in event of rejection of Petition
-
July 4th Bull ring riots-
-
July 12th Petition rejected by the House of Commons by 235 votes to 46; Convention called for "Sacred Month"
- August Convention retracts its decision on "Sacred Month"
- September Convention dissolved
-
November Newport Uprising
-
December Arrest of many Chartist leaders; trial of John Frost for participation in Newport Uprising starts
1840
- January John Frost found guilty of treason; he with others sentenced to death;
Abortive rising in Sheffield and Bradford February
Sentences on Welsh leaders commuted to transportation for life
Key Issues
-
Development of National Convention- alternative and more democratic assembly to parliament proposed during 1838- members decided by mass meetings.
- Was it too democratic a movement? -
- Did this lead to poor organisation and decision making?
- Who were the members of the first convention? -
Richard Brown- "In many respects, the convention was rather less representative than O'Connor claimed: under half of the delegates were working men."
- Mass Meeting
- Processions, flags, music- feeling of inclusivity- all welcome.
- Sense of drama between crowd and speakers-
- sources recreating just the content of the speech will fail to reveal the importance of this relationship-
-
these themes have been researched by James Epstein- Lion of freedom, and John Belchem.
- National Petition
- Developed by BPU- worked together with Peoples Charter.
- Size of Petition staggering- 1,280,000 signatures.
-
Working Class Press-
-
Dorothy Thompson argues key to first stage- foundation of Northern Star to her represents the start of the mass movement.
- Northern Star- dominated by O'Connor but allowed a range of ideas- again INCLUSIVITY a key- develops alternative and independent working class culture- poems, letter pages
- Develops nation-wide communication- plans meetings, lectures etc
-
Impact of Bull Ring riots-
- presentation of petition hi-jacked by violence in Birmingham.
- Allegations that authorities triggered violence
- Effect- labelled Chartists as violent- warned away middle class.
-
Divided leadership-
-
growing rifts between William Lovett and O'Connor.
- Key issue- was O'Connor an advantage or hindrance to the movement.
- What to do if Petition rejected?
- Problem never re-solved and revealed major splits in strategy.
-
Edward Royle- "With the rejection of the Petition, collapse of the convention, Chartist as a movement was in danger of collapse."
- Sacred Month- but industrial areas not ready- workers suffering would be too great.
- Complete another petition.
- Improve organisation
-
Violence and national uprising- e.g. Newport. Was a national uprising ever a possibility?
- The reaction of the government.
- Arrested key leaders but avoided creating martyrs. E.g.. Initially planned to execute Newport leaders but later changed to transportation.
Richard Brown- Government reaction conciliatory- allowed Chartists to alienate middle class reformers.
- O'Connor and Lovett imprisoned in early 1840- Chartist looked to have been defeated.
Edward Royle- "The first stage in the history of Chartist was over, with the men who had shaped its origins safely under lock and key, learning the errors of their ways. Chief of these appeared to be lack of organisation."
Overall
Richard Brown- "The tone of the movement was beginning to change: it lost some of its early spontaneity and optimism and its belief that the acceptance of the Charter was imminent."
Phase 2- 1840-42
1840
Key Issues
- State of party after first rejection
- Defeat and mass arrests in 1839-40 had left Chartist in considerable disarray.
- National Charter Association
- Realisation that organisation needed improving- NCA created early summer 1840
- Claimed to be first independent political party of working class.
- During 1841- NCA claimed 50,000 members.
- Organised lecturing circuits
- Role of O'Connor
- Division with Lovett widened- O'Connor supported continuation of mass platform- Lovett regarded this as a failure.
- O'Connor toured country wearing fustian and rode in coaches surrounded by flags and banners.
- Becomes personality- did this help movement?
- Use of the Second Petition
- Proposed by Dr. McDonnell in September 1841- more effectively organised than 1839
- House of Commons rejected it
- New Movers
-
From 1840 onwards Lovett argues educational reform necessary sequal to political change- Lovett proposes national association for "promoting the political and social improvement of the people."
- Aimed to re-create the elite politics and ideological focus of LWMA
-
Create respectable working class based on values of artisan- winning vote test of moral character.
-
O'Connor concerned Lovetts idea of respectability would threaten unity of working class- creates working class elite.
- O'Connor also argued that voting in Lovetts view was no longer a right but had to be earnt.
-
O'Connor criticised Lovett calling him a Knowledge Chartist
-
Christian Chartist- Henry Vincent
-
Teetotalism- Robert Lowery
D. Thompson- shouldn't make mistake that O'Connor was against education or teetotalism. What so annoyed O'Connor was that Teetotal groups and New Movers were putting forward there ideas as alternatives to Chartist.
- Also O'Connor believed that middle class values were being imposed upon Chartists and that one of the movements aims was an independent culture.
-
Other important groups-
- Anti Corn Law League
-
Complete Suffrage Union- Joseph Sturge
All groups aimed to increase link between middle class and working class.
-
Anti Corn Law League- pro free trade- opposed to tariffs on foreign grain.
Aimed to gain working class support for campaign- main message- lower bread prices.
-
Complete Suffrage Union- developed in Birmingham by Joseph Sturge
Re-alliance between middle class radicals and certain working class members- wanted to change name of Chartists as it carried violent connotations.
Alliance between working and middle class here always uneasy- middle class suspicious of Chartist influences.
Chartists saw anti Corn Law league as distration from main agenda.
- Was the 1842 movement primarily economically motivated?
- Major issue- how in control were the Chartists in this protest-
-
Rostow's model of economic protest- clear link between economic depression and protest.
Economic depression triggers protest and improvement seems to end it.
- However fails to explain the multi facetted reaction to poverty- people react to poverty in different ways..
-
Key in this incident- not just depression but employers reaction- wages are cut. People protest when something is taken away.
-
Chartists and Trade Union link varies throughout the country but very strong in Lancashire- work together.
- No reason to see political and economic aims at this stage as mutually exclusive.
John Belchem- "Chartist cannot be understood by the changes in the trade cycle, by the study of economic statistics and charts of social tension."
Edward Royle- "The events of 1842 enable historians to glimpse the extent to which local radicals were able to express the grievances of the worker and make association between economics and politics."
- Why did Chartist fail in 1842?
-
Lack of centralised planning- James Epstein
-
FC Mather- government reaction swift and effective- leaders arrested- protests put down- no martyrs created.
Eric Evans- "Though the challenges of the authorities were extreme, the authorities were well equipped to meet them. Train could move troops quickly and efficiently. The government had learned not to over-react and a good harvest alleviated some of the grinding misery of working people."
- Leadership- too divided and reacted to situation rather than lead
- Enthusiasm of movement waned after 1839
- Working class increasingly split- unskilled often not involved in Chartism
- Economic demands not political- when economy improves- appeal of Chartism diminished
Third Phase- 1843-1848
Main Events
1843
-
Sep- NCA meet in Birmingham- Land Plan first discussed
1845-
-
April- NCA Convention- Chartist Land Co-operative Society approved
1846-
-
Land brought for Chartist colonies at Heronsgate and Lowlands
1847-
-
first Chartist colony- O'Connorville
- Chartist Land Co-operative Society changes name to National Co-operative Land Company
1848
- March- riots in London, Glasgow and Manchester
-
7 April- Security Bill proposed in Parliament- special provisions for Chartist protest.
-
10 April Chartist demonstration on Kennington Common- petition delivered to Parliament by O'Connor.
Thousands of special constables and troops brought into the capital
Threats of violence but meeting breaks up peacefully.
- May/ June- riots throughout country
- Arrests of key leaders- movement quickly diminishes
Key issues
- O'Connors control
JT Ward- "What was left of organised Chartist was now controlled by the megalomaniac Irishman, and he was now monarch of a declining kingdom."
- Increasingly negative image of O'Connor forwarded.
-
Thomas Cooper disillusioned with movement.
- Land Plan
- Conservative policy- reaction to growing dominance of machinery
-
Influence for idea- Diggers and Levellers 1640-50's, Thomas Paine and Thomas Spence
- Popular with many working class- great enthusiasm Lancashire cotton towns, Midlands and Yorkshire
- Chartists plan to buy land- use subscriptions- charge 5 ponds for two acres a year- re-invest the profit to buy more land.
- Aim to create working class independence and re-structure society
- Large support but only 250 people received Land Funds managed poorly
- Did this represent a loss of reality?
- Alternative directions-
-
English and Irish Radicalism- large and growing Irish population, particularly in northern cities.
- Both Irish and Chartists critical of government- Ireland want repeal of act of Union.
- Close links- theoretically good for numbers and means government must maintain army in both Ireland and Britain.
BUT
- Catholic Church critical of Chartists
- Epstein- many English workers anti Irish
- Belchem- press portrayed Chartists as Irish- violent label
- Internationalism
- Hetherington and Lovett- British working class part of wider European movement for working class freedom
- E. Jones and Harney- supported international revolution- both individuals limited influence.
Historian John Saville- 1848 up-rising needs to be seen in context of France and Ireland.
4) April protest
- High food prices brought rioting in March
- News of King Louis Phillipes fall- panic among property owners in Britain- fear of revolution
- 8,000 troops and 85,000 special constables- led by Duke of Wellington
- O'Connor forced to present petition with small group, not planned mass march
- Protest ridiculed by authorities
- Problems continue through summer but spies infiltrate
- Again reaction of authorities astute.
Leadership
Key Issues
- Did O'Connor hinder or help the movement?
- What impact did Lovett's emphasis on respectability and moral progress have on the vitality of Chartism?
- Which other leaders were significant in the Chartist movement?
R.C Gammage first Chartist historian established orthodoxy on view of leaders
-
Good leaders- William Lovett, Henry Vincent, Bronterre O'Brien- forward thinking
-
Bad leaders- George Julian Harney, Ernst Jones, Fergus O'Connor
However in recent years this view questioned- key historian James Epstein view's Fergus O'Connor as the key factor in holding the movement together.
- Physical force versus moral force
- Basic division between those who were willing to use force and those that relied on moral pressure.
-
E.g. London Working Mens Association- moral force
-
George Julian Harney's London Democratic Association- used more violent rhetoric
However
- Many leaders used violent language without ever wishing to see people rebel.
Eric Evans- "Chartist leaders knew that a failed uprising was the worst outcome."
- Some of moral force leaders used violent language- eg Robert Lowery of temperence movement- violent rhetoric used as a device.
-
Violent rhetoric helped to unify working classes and helped to differentiate from the middle class movements such as CSU.
It was a way of asserting working class solidarity.
Overall view- successes of leadership
- Responds to number of difficult situations extremely well, refusing to accept defeat eg. 1839 and 1842 people such as O'Connor maintain support.
-
The leaders produced some great popular journalism- Bronterre O'Brien- Poor Mans Guardian, Fergus O'Connor Northern Star, George Julian Harney- Northern Star
-
The organisation of meetings, lectures and events highly organised. Thomas Cooper arranged a series of lectures in Leicester in the time around 1842
- All leaders stressed the importance of education even though they disagreed over its impact on the movement.
- The leaders tried to transform an elitist artisan radical tradition into something more popular and influential.
- They created an alternative culture for many working class areas including Church Chartism, Self help groups, Chartist schools.
Who were the Chartists?
Key Source problem
- Limited accurate data on make up of movement-
- rely on working class autobiographies- are they representative of workers at this time
- records of radicals,
- membership lists of the NCA,
- popular ballads.
Many of those associated with the movement have remained hidden to history, particularly those involved in the violent underground. Many supported Chartism without joining.
-
Issue of violence very difficult to assess- spy records are unreliable as spies relied on discovering potential revolutionaries- long tradition of the agent provocateur.
Geography of movement
D. Thompson- this was the first ever national working class movement.
- Supporters throughout the country from rural Cornwall and Isle of Wight to industrial north. It spread the whole of Britain- Wales, Scotland and England.
-
Main areas for movement in Midlands, Yorkshire ( West Riding), Lancashire, South Wales, and Black Country
- London was not that influential in early stages of Chartism- becomes more so in 1848. One of key issues is that London's trades were too divided and a sense of community was difficult to foster.
-
Most common area for Chartism were industrial villages and medium sized towns- eg Oldham, Ashton under Lyme, Stockport-
- Larger cities and towns lacked community.
-
Liverpool poor Chartist support in 1839 and 1842 because of ethnic divisions between Irish and English
-
Movement weak in areas with strong Wesleyan Methodism and Catholicism
Gender
Role of women in movement neglected until Dorothy Thompson researched issue in 1970's and 1980's.
They have been neglected for a number of reasons
- Feminist historians perceived them as insignificant as Chartists did not demand universal suffrage.
- Very little source material left- few women ever involved in local leadership.
- Earlier historians neglected cultural element of Chartism- concentrated on serious political message. Role of women vital in maintaining vibrant Chartist culture.
- Women often bore brunt of economic problems- particularly effected by introduction of poor law. They felt full force of Whig betrayal.
- Helped organisation of movement- co-ordinated meetings, parties, trips and tea parties.
- Boycotted shops who did not support Chartists
- Collected for Chartist prisoners, particularly after first rejection.
- In mid to late 1840's the role of women in movement becomes increasingly marginalised- maybe consequence of emerging Victorian gender identities.
Occupation
Only have source material from those high enough up the social ladder to read and write- does this mean that many Chartist supporters can never be identified?
- Many Chartists previously skilled workers- jobs down graded by industrial revolution
- Skilled occupations that maintained status remained aloof to Chartism- bookbinding and watch making
Issue of those at bottom of society is very difficult to assess. It does need to be recognised though that the level of support and diversity was unprecedented.
Were the Chartists working class?
- Marx- working class proletariat means non capital owning
- However many of Chartists owned shops, small workshops,
Maybe that we need broader definition of working class- introduced by James Epstein, D. Thompson and D. Jones.