• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

Extracts from this document...


'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster' Stalin wanted to drastically improve the Soviet Union's industry, his country was decades behind industrially in comparison to other countries, and the NEP was not working, in order for Russia to be self sufficient a change was needed. In a country as vast as the USSR, and with a large peasant population it was decided that the farms and country side needed to be transformed, in order to create a chain reaction that would result in more food and workers for the cities, better international trade and thus more machinery. The solution, according to the government, was Collectivisation. Collectivisation succeeded in spreading the communist message out of the cities and into rural villages, however, in terms of human cost, it was a catastrophe, for those in the country at least. Robert Conquest deemed it 'a man made famine', millions lost their lives and the surplus food the government hoped to uncover just did not exist. Economically the grain yields and number of animals never reached pre revolution levels and millions starved. Externally and at a shallow level Collectivisation seemed like a good idea for a communist society; it abolished the class system and the capitalist nature of farming, in theory everybody would be equal and the communist government would create an egalitarian countryside working towards the good of the whole country; however in practice it was very different. ...read more.


In the Ukraine alone, historians such as Werth and Conquest have estimated the death toll at around 6 million, a huge cost in human life. In keeping with Stalinist values, the peasants were not seen as important, they were inferior to the workers and so there welfare was not considered top priority during the implementation of collectivisation. As a result of this Peasants experienced extreme hardships, poverty and death as a result. Those who were relocated to collective farms had to survive transport and the imposition of completely new ways of living and farming. Those who were no longer needed went to the cities were they experienced extreme dislocation, this then in turn affected industrilisation as poorly trained peasants with little disciplined were put into factories. In terms of the economic achievements of collectivisation it seems unjust to call it a failure, Stalin succeeded in modernising many aspects of rural farming in 10 years, a task which had taken many western countries generations. Tractors could be used on bigger stretches of land to sow seeds and help make farming more efficient. Collectivisation also freed 17 million workers to go towards the city and help contribute towards industrialization and the five year plans. Although figures must be dealt with carefully as they are not always accurate, by the end of 1931 the state collected 22.8 million tones of grain, which ...read more.


Many historians have blamed the social failure of collectivization on the speed it was put into effect; in theory it seemed a good idea in keeping with communist values, however the speed at which Stalin tried to enforce and change the system came at a huge cost to human life. Soviet Russia had succeeded in modernising ancient farming methods and were able to trade with foreign countries for equipment; it allowed the cities 17 million more workers and helped towards industrialization, demonstrating that it was not all together an economic failure, yet this caused a massive disruption in the country as millions of people were relocated, the existence of internal passports at this time shows how much movement was happening. Politically they succeeded in driving the communist message into the countries, as well as having party members in every village, spreading the communist beliefs and informing on opposition, as well as gaining international recognition for the rapid improvements in industry. However in terms of humanity, collectivisation caused millions to die unnecessarily; it took years for grain crops to reach pre-collectivisation levels, and even when they did they now had to feed millions of workers, be used for export and trade, and feed the peasants themselves, resulting in famines and deaths of millions. Collectivisation seemed to show no mercy towards peasants, their families or their property, and the means to do not justify the ends when we look at the sheer human cost. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    Again he continued to fill vacancies with Normans. In 1075, thirteen out of twenty-five abbots were English but in contrast, in 1087 only three were English. William went on to appoint Lanfranc as Archbishop of Canterbury (who was also his personal abbot of St Stephen's at Caen) who contributed hugely to the English Church.

  2. Archaeology: Methods of Preservation (Tutankhamen & Iceman)

    also helped to identify him as a Pharaoh as they were crossed over his chest, in a regal position. After wrapping the body had a mask placed over it, and was then placed into the burial coffin. The dry conditions of the Egyptian desert also helped to provide an environment for preservation.

  1. Assess Louis achievements in foreign policy by 1684. Account for his success in this ...

    For example, he gave Charles II of England subsidies which ensured that England remained neutral at the beginning of the Dutch War. The increasing Bourbon supremacy over the Hapsburgs also demonstrates Louis' enhanced gloire. With his gains in Franche-Comt� and Spanish Netherlands, Louis was demolishing the Circle of Burgundy.

  2. Examine the impact of the Great Famine on Irelands society, economy and politics

    (Wikipedia, last modified on 5th of May 2009) The repercussions of this can still be seen today, and is shown by many Irish-Americans taking an interest in political events in Ireland. In fact the Irish Republican Brotherhood was formed simultaneously in Dublin and New York in 1858.

  1. The cult of Stalin and the purges of the 1930(TM)s were two aspects of ...

    The first 'show trial' was held in August 1936 and heralded the beginning of the great purges. The show trials were held in public to generate public humiliation for the defendants, to illustrate consequences to other potential rivals and to convey the threat of conspiracies against the government, thus resulting in fear amongst the nation.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    However, Nicaea was positioned so that to take it without military support from the sea was not possible. Here, Byzantine fleet provided a necessary support and the city was taken. The army of the Crusaders went on and on 1 July 1097 Crusaders were able to defeat the Seljuks in the former Byzantine territories from Dorileya.

  1. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    However, arguably his biggest flaw was his inability to change the already ridged economy. Brezhnev had new ideas but couldn?t fight the system and by the end of his reign, Russia had made little improvement. Historian Dmitri Volkognov best sums up the Brezhnev period saying: ?If Lenin and Stalin, and

  2. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    The Constitutional Democrats (Kadets) were the leading liberal party and they wanted Russia to develop a constitutional monarchy in which power of the tsar would be restricted by a democracy elected constitutional assembly. The kadets claimed this would settle the national outstanding social, political and economical problems.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work