• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Communist Purification in Czechoslovakia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Andrej Zsoldos Mr. Osterlund 20th Century History 2003/04/30 Communist Purification in Czechoslovakia In August 1968, the Soviet Union under the leadership of Leonid Brezhnev has invaded Czechoslovakia to restore communism, to minimize western influence and to counterbalance any measures of democratization. As early as in the late 40's, under the leadership of Stalin, the Czechoslovakian officials were informed and warned not to accept the aid from the Marshall Plan proposed by the United States. The real reason that provoked Brezhnev and ignited his power to use his Soviet might, was the Prague Spring. This short era was gradually launched by Alexander Dubcek, the Secretary General of the Slovak Communist Party and the leader of Czechoslovakia from January 1968 till the invasion. The Soviet Union was technically forbidden to allow any state within their sphere of influence to turn or become democratic. After the invasion, Czechoslovakia's foreign and internal affairs were closely bonded with the Soviets', and so the Czechoslovak population felt isolated and even erased from the rest of Europe. However, towards the mid 1970's communism in Eastern Europe gradually began to lose its strength mainly thanks to the Helsinki Conference, which tackled European Cooperation and Security, in 1975. ...read more.

Middle

These leaders were mainly concerned about their communist party being overthrown and weakened if by any chance the democratization efforts and movements would reach their countries. The only Eastern European country's ruler that agreed and supported Dubcek's actions was Tito in Yugoslavia. (Schlesinger 84-85) However, Leonid Brezhnev was the most upset and uneasy regarding Czechoslovakia's movement towards democracy and liberality. At the climax of the Prague Spring, in March, Brezhnev announced in a speech that he would no longer accept and abide by Dubcek's disgraceful measures. Nonetheless, Dubcek did not get threatened. The Soviet leader could not tolerate Dubceks's policies and so in late July he insisted on a personal meeting with him on the Soviet-Czechoslovak border. Brezhnev tried to intimidate and oppress Alexander Dubcek to immediately mitigate the reforms and obliterate any efforts of democratization. However, the Soviet speculative mind had not settled for negotiations, and so Brezhnev, in his usual and expected manner, took the violent route. Besides his negativistic attitude towards this struggle, he also received pressures and requests from fellow communist leaders; such were Ulbricht and Gomulka, to crush and contain the Czechoslovak reform movements. ...read more.

Conclusion

This treaty was signed by 35 countries in July 1975 in Helsinki, Finland. (Schlesinger 93) The dilemma was simple and Brezhnev's hypocrisy and double standard became visible and obvious. The treaty included human rights and freedom of speech/press clauses that Brezhnev ignored and so later on he had to face severe consequences to his detriment. Monitoring from Helsinki was commenced in Moscow, and later in Ukraine, Lithuania, Georgia, and Armenia. This was Brezhnev's unintended side effect hegemonistic and territorial greed. (Schlesinger 93) Leonid Brezhnev invaded Czechoslovakia with the aim to restore communism and counter any efforts of democratization and reform conducted by Alexander Dubcek, the head of Czechoslovakia since January 1968 and the coordinator of the Prague Spring. Brezhnev put all is power, military and political, to purge the communist parties around the world by assigning them obligations according to the Marxist Leninist authoritarian system. Brezhnev has succeeded to overthrow the government and restore the communist regime in Czechoslovakia, however failed to convince the bulk of a country, and that is the populace. And in the end the western public realized that no longer was communism the appealing and ideal system for developing countries. Leonid Brezhnev's territorial and influential ravenousness showed the world that his hypocrisy and two-faced character was inappropriate to lead one of the two superpowers in the bipolar world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Legacy of Communist Leaders.

    1917-1918 The Brest- Litovsk Treaty. The result of it is that Russia disjoined from east territories and Germany demands to allow self-determination to Ukraine, Byelorussia and Baltic states. Under Lenin anything that was about individualism, being an individual simply did not exist. On the other hand Vladimir Lenin thought a lot about education and thought that everyone must study.

  2. Events in the Soviet Union brought down Communist regimes in Eastern Europe - Discuss

    themselves they will inevitably ask awkward questions, and question their own autonomy11. Nationalistic issues would cause a downward spiral effect on the Soviet economy, national groups would protest against the centre, blaming them for the depravation that was being inflicted.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Even Molotov's wife was sent to Siberia. In the meantime, hundreds of thousands of minority nationalities in the Soviet Union were removed forcibly from their homelands when they protested the attempted obliteration of their ancient identities. Some Westerners speculated that Stalin was clinically psychotic, so paranoid about the erosion of

  2. American History.

    In return the US wouldn't interfere in Europe. - Essentially, the MD was a big bluff b/c the US didn't have the military strength to enforce it. Luckily, the British had their own motives for keeping the rest of Europe away [trade], so it worked out.

  1. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    After all Reagan had decided to escalate the arms race and if Gorbachev failed to improve the economy it was clear that the Soviet Union would lose the Cold War! 1998: Describe the key features of Glasnost (8) 2000: Describe the key features of Glasnost and Perestroika (10)

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    It gave Palestinian military operations in Beirut an internal Lebanese Muslim cover; (ii) It undermined the influence of the Sunni political leadership on the 'street', particularly in Beirut; (iii) It underlined Sunni opposition to Syrian policy in Lebanon. Being largely dependent on Fateh, al-Murabitun was a useful instrument of military

  1. Why were the Prague Spring reforms unacceptable to the Soviet leadership?

    without any qualms. "The education [Dubcek] had received in the advanced party school and his experience in the Party apparatus inculcated blind discipline, as well as limiting his horizons and defining his terms of reference."5 Thus, the reforms that were enacted by the Dubcek administration could not be identified

  2. The government in China today is communist.

    Yuan Shikai became president of China in 1912 after the death of the last of the Manchu's. When he came to power he set up a constitutional republic, in other words a democracy. He dissolved the National Assembly in 1914 after his party lost the majority.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work