• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that the 1934 Poor Law Amendment Act applied sound principles to serious problems?

Extracts from this document...


Do you agree with the view that the 1934 Poor Law Amendment Act applied ‘sound principles’ to serious problems? (40) The 1934 Poor Law Amendment Act (PLAA) applied only partly sound principles to tackle the serious problems around at the time in Britain. Source 13 shows statistics on the cost of Poor Relief and suggests that the PLAA only fixed the serious problems to a certain extent, since although cost goes down in 1934, it does go back up in 1844, which maybe down to Outdoor Relief being discouraged not banned. Source 14, in line with the question, completely agrees with the statement as it suggests that ‘sound principles’ were adopted and very administered effectively. Source 15, on the other hand, suggests that the PLAA did not apply ‘sound principles’ to serious problems and was rather a ‘ghastly mistake’. Therefore the 1934 PLAA only partly solved all the serious problems in Britain at the time. Source 13 states that in 1834, the average expenditure went down to £4,946,000 compared to the previous years which had an average expenditure per year of £6,758,000. ...read more.


The report also claims that ?repression of the idle and vagrant poor can be achieved...so that the situation of the pauper shall not be so eligible as the situation of the independent labourer of the lowest class?. This suggests that paupers who cannot or do not want to work will be put into workhouses, where life is more worse when inside the workhouse, so as to act as a deterrence and encourage more paupers to take up employment and reduce the cost of Poor Relief, thus showing that ?sound principles? were applied to serious problems. Therefore the analysis of the Royal Commission can be seen thoughtful and that they did have a sensible attempt at applying ?sound principles?. However, contradictory to the claims made in the report in Source 14, Outdoor Relief was not banned but only discouraged, thus disagreeing with the claim that idle and vagrant poor were repressed. This is because rather than entering the Workhouses, the paupers can rather support themselves by claiming Outdoor Relief, which in turn would have increased the cost of Poor relief, as shown in Source 13, therefore showing that the PLAA did not apply ?sound principles?. ...read more.


Source 15 is derived from a modern-day textbook written by a modern-day author. Consequently the reliability of the source would increase, as the judgement the author arrives at would have been based on thorough research and dependant on several other sources, and the purpose of this source is not influence the reader to one side, but rather to come to a clear conclusion after looking at both sides, thus also increasing the usefulness as well. To conclude, the PLAA was only able to partly apply ?sound principles? to serious problems. Although the PLAA was able to reduce the cost of Poor Relief, mainly through introducing harsh Workhouse environments, which would stop paupers claiming relief, it was not able to sustain this aim as in 1844 the cost of poor relief increased. This was mainly because Outdoor Relief was discouraged but not banned, therefore led paupers to still continue in claiming Outdoor Relief. However the failure of the PLAA was inevitable as they could not have banned Outdoor Relief since it would have led to public outrage and added to the agricultural unrest may have resulted in an unwanted revolution. Therefore the short-term success of the PLAA was the expectation as with Outdoor Relief, sustaining long-term success would have been near impossible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How did the elderly fare in welfare terms under the English New Poor Law?

    Ironically, Malthus and contemporary commentators such as the French social analyst, Say (1828:398) blamed the very existence of the Old Poor Law for the burgeoning numbers of the English working classes at the beginning of the nineteenth century. "There were scarcely any machines at the time of Queen Elizabeth and

  2. What was the impact of the Poor Law Amendment Act on the relief of ...

    The fear of poverty was the main drive of identifying the different groups of poor. People wanted to make sure that they were receiving the right treatment and it was also to determine those who were deserving of help and those who were not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work