• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Source A adequately explain the reasons for German Surrender at Stalingrad?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework. 1) Does Source A adequately explain the reasons for German Surrender at Stalingrad? I think that Source A does not give an adequate reason why the Germans surrendered at Stalingrad. In Source A, the only reason that General Paulus gave Hitler was because of the fact that the German supply lines had been broken and that they had no supplies: "Troops without ammunition or food... ...18000 wounded without any supplies of dressings or drugs" This is a direct quote of what General Paulus sent in a telegram to Hitler as a reason for surrendering at Stalingrad. Paulus had decided to tell Hitler that the reason for them surrendering was because they could no longer hold the city, or attack it, for their supply lines had been broken. But this was not entirely true. There were many other reasons for Paulus wanting to surrender at Stalingrad. For example the Germans were not equipped to deal with this type of Urban Warfare, where the Russians were embedded deep in the city while the Germans had to attack from the outside and work there way in, checking every building as they went along. This was very tiring and nerve wracking work, for the Germans could never be sure about the buildings that they were going into check, for there could be snipers in their or the building could be booby trapped. Also the Russians put up a passionate defence of their city, and were defending it very well. Paulus could not tell this to Hitler though, for Hitler believed the Russians to be sub-human, and this was his sixth army who were attacking them, the army that conquered France in six weeks! ...read more.


For Source D shows the German supply lines being attacked upon. I think that it was the lack of supplies that hurt Germany the most, for they were in the middle of Russia, miles away from anything German, and they had just come out of a long hard Russian winter in which no supplies could get to them anyway. They were out of supplies before the Germans encircled them. 4) Why are these two interpretations about the end of the battle of Stalingrad so different? Sources E and F are so different because they are trying to do two different things. Source E is a German propaganda broadcast trying to say that it doesn't matter that they have lost Stalingrad, but they had held off the Germans and so the rest of Germany might be spared: "... it tied down strong enemy forces for a number of weeks of the fiercest fighting." But this was not true. The Germans did not hold the Russians down for a number of weeks, the Germans were completely surrounded and they could not do anything. This Source is also completely empty of facts. That is the reason, I think, that they put this notice over the radio. The whole point of the broadcast was to keep moral up; it was to stop the German Citizens and the other soldiers panicking. Source F is an extract from a Russian history textbook. The point of this was to prove to everyone that the Russians won convincingly. As this is textbook, it gives a lot of facts, most of which are true. ...read more.


It says that Stalingrad was where it all started and so must have been more important to the Russians. But in the long term I think that Stalingrad was more important to the Germans, for it was at Stalingrad that things began to change for the Germans. Unlike the allies who were used to loosing the Germans were not. This meant that when they lost, they just crumbled. Source C says it the best when the German solider who wrote the letter said: "If what we were promised is not true, then Germany will be lost." This shows that even though the Germans had never been beaten, when they were they just crumbled. The Germans believed in their own invincibility and when they were beaten to 'sub-humans' they fell apart. Source A under explained the reason for the German loss; it limited it to the supply problem, whereas I know that it was multiple problems. Source E is saying the defeat at Stalingrad was not important at all but this was an underestimation of the German morale, for when they were defeated they just fell apart. Source G agrees with Source E by saying that it did not really matter that the Germans lost, but Source G was just saying this so that he would get more readers. Finally Source H says that Stalingrad was the reason that the Germans lost the Second World War. He says that after Stalingrad the Germans soldiers realised that Hitler did not know what he was doing. These are the reasons that I think that in the short term Stalingrad was more important to the Russians while in the long term it was more important to the Germans. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point in the war against ...

    The Russians were taken by surprise, at first all the Russians could do was retreat. They traded men and territory for time . It seemed like Hitler was headed straight for what he wanted with nothing to stop him, his plan of action worked for a while trapping the Russians

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Yet the ghost of Hitler continues to spook the Germans and the world at large: "Hitler is today all around us - in our loathings, our fears, our fantasies of power and victimization, our nightmares of vile experience and violent endings.""

  1. The battle of Britain was an important turning point in the second world war ...

    it was left empty and so the two countries Germany and Russia who wanted revenge for Poland getting some of their land got Poland split up between them. It was split along the line that had been suggested in 1919 by the British foreign secutary Lord Cuizon.

  2. GREAT BRITAIN took part in Operation Overlord for a number of reasons. One such ...

    This made British and other Allied commanders more confident that an invasion of Western Europe would succeed and probably more in agreement with such a plan than they would have been in previous years. Another reason for the idea of an invasion being enacted was morale.

  1. In February 1943, the German army surrendered at Stalingrad - Was Hitler's interference the ...

    It was also unfortunate for the Russians, as they had done badly in the small war against the Fins over the winter of 1939/1940, this giving further hope to the Germans of being able to defeat the Soviet armies within four months before the long soviet winters set in.

  2. Paulus who was commander of the 6th Army, to the Germany army high command, ...

    550 tonnes were promised a day but only 140 came the 1st day and by the 3rd day no supplies came at all. The source does not mention how Hitler refused to let his army in Stalingrad to surrender. Paulus was a good office manager but could not look after troops well.

  1. Lenin's Russia, source based work.

    In the second photo Lenin is again standing on the podium but in this photo there is no Trotsky or Kamenev, photographic experts have removed Trotsky and Kamenev. 4. These pictures are so different because in the first one Lenin is accompanied by two men, Trotsky and Kamenev but in the second picture they have disappeared from the image.

  2. What can we learn from Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel ...

    It shows Nasser standing up for Egypt and thus it is unsurprising that the people are behind him. In source C the cartoon is satirical and a political point is made through humour. The purpose of the cartoon is to first poke fun at the British and secondly to encourage the Egyptians.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work