Explain how Italian military weakness in the period 1940-43 contributed to Italy's failure in the Second World War.

Authors Avatar by erinruth99gmailcom (student)

EXPLAIN HOW ITALIAN MILITARY WEAKNESS IN THE PERIOD 1940-43 CONTRIBUTED TO ITALY'S FAILURE IN THE 2WW. (8)

There is no doubt in the fact that Italy’s military were woefully underprepared for the realities of war. Mussolini’s poor decisions as Commander-in-Chief were an example of weakness such as sending 300 inadequate aircraft to take part in the invasion of Britain when they could have been used far more effectively in the Mediterranean theatre of war.

Italy’s armed forces were inadequate to the demands placed on them by Mussolini. There were insufficient men in the army – the Italian army of 1940 was nearer to 3 million rather than the 8 million Mussolini boosted to achieving; there were only 1.2 million rifles, many of them dating back to 1891; there were only 1500 tanks and many of these were light! The Chief of the Army staff complained to Mussolini. Mussolini assured him that there was no need for concern as the army was mainly intended for show and not for action!

Join now!

Mussolini gambled everything on a ‘lightning war’ or ‘guerra lampo’. This was inoperable partly because Italy had no equivalent to Germany’s Panzer divisions (not enough tanks for this), and, partly because Italian generals were intensely suspicious of such methods. The Italian army was badly led: the 600 generals were steeped in the defensive tactics of the First World War. It was Mussolini’s fault that they were so incompetent: he had concentrated power in his own hands, promoting officers more for their obedience and powers of flattery than for their military expertise. There was virtually no co-operation with either the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay