• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks Split in 1903

Extracts from this document...


History Essay Explain why the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks Split in 1903 The Bolsheviks and Mensheviks were two parts of the All-Russian Social Democratic Labour Party or the Social Democrats. The Social Democrats had been formed in 1898. They did not split until their Second Congress in 1903 when there was a dispute over their political tactics. Not only did the two parties have different views about how the party should be run, but they also had disagreements over whether the country was ready for revolution or not. However, the split between the parties was as much to do with Lenin's personality rather than their conflicting ideologies. Lenin's opponents believed that behind his tactics was an extremely fierce determination for Lenin to become the dictator of the party. ...read more.


Plekhanov and his followers though that the party should be very broadly based and they should allow anyone join who wished to do so. Both parties also disagreed whether Russia was ready for a revolution and who would be leading this revolution. The Bolsheviks view was that the bourgeoisie and the proletarian stages of the revolution would be merged into one while the Mensheviks believed that Russia was not even ready for a proletarian revolution yet. Both parties agreed that a revolution would come eventually but the Mensheviks took the stand that there would be a long period where a middle class democratic government would be in charge. When this party would be in charge the workers would develop and class and revolutionary consciousness until eventually they were ready for a revolution. ...read more.


However, the Bolsheviks seemed to attract the younger and more militant workers who liked to have some form of discipline, have firm leadership and quite simple slogans. The Mensheviks attracted a range of different type of works and members of the intelligentsia. They also attracted a lot more non-Russians especially Jews and Georgians. In the Second Congress, Plekhanov was defeated by Lenin. Lenin and his followers had forced the party to decide whether to follow Plekhanov's idea of a broad-based party which was open to all revolutionaries or his own idea of a small, tightly knit and very exclusive party. Plekhanov's followers were named the Mensheviks, or the minority party and Lenin's followers were names the Bolsheviks. However, at the time when tsarist government fell in 1917, the Mensheviks were always the side with the most members while the Bolsheviks were the side with the fewer members. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Mideival Outline Essay

    Accolade was usually preceded by religious ceremony which featured praying, fasting, blessing the weapons, bad of purification and keeping vigil after the 12th century. After being formally knighted the knights served the mightier lords or were hired by them. Some knights held land and castles, while the others were landless and joined various military orders.

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    Following the events of the 1905 revolution, the resulting achievement by the Russian revolutionaries was the October Manifesto, which allowed for greater civil rights for citizens, and for a national parliament; the Duma. The achievement of the Dumas themselves was quite an accomplishment and important advance of the nation.

  1. How has the nature of leadership changed over the period 1790-1945?

    From personal experience, Fuller also accounted for the significant boost to collective morale which could be achieved simply through the presence of Commander-in-Chief. From a modern and cynical perspective such visits to the trenches may seem rather hollow gestures, and undoubtedly no soldier could have expected this to be a

  2. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    This new policy was seen by historians such as Grigory Zinoviev as being a "tactical retreat" as it went against the fundamental beliefs of Communism. The New Economic Policy had Russia reverting back to Capitalism as a way of saving it - it allowed small business to reopen for private

  1. Cities were the main driving force of the Reformation in Germany(TM) " explain whether ...

    However, due to the flexibility of Luther's message, supporters came from different backgrounds; ranging from the peasants to the imperial knights, indicating that the broadened appeal of the message played a major role in suiting all people. Luther promptly tailored his message to agree with differing audiences.

  2. South African Heritage - Where we come from?

    Source E only presents one side of the debate. Work out what the other side would be. The other side of the argument would argue that by re-establishing the historical presence of the Khoisan and by exposing all their cultural achievements their human dignity is restored. The museum could have argued that the Miscast exhibition made a huge contribution to the effort of re-appraising the past.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work