Henry VI's weakness as a King Directly Led to the outbreak of war in 1455.

Authors Avatar

Henry VI's weakness as a King Directly Led to the outbreak of war in 1455. How far do you agree?

By Harrison Cartmer-Edwards

I believe that Henry VI's weakness as a king directly led to the outbreak of war in 1455. By the 1450's England was taking steps back after the leaps forward in welfare and expansion made by his predecessors Edward III and Henry . This was nearly fully due to Henry VI's weak personality, which resulted in poor political control, which directly led to the over mighty nobles, who had the military and financial power to challenge even the king himself. So as a direct result, due to Henry VI's weak and uninspiring reign, incredible powerful nobles could, and felt they needed to change the regime by force.

The first strong factor towards the outbreak of war was that Henry VI was an extremely weak king. He didn't possess any of the qualities a good strong King should have, such as Chivalry, a grasp of politics and commanding talent. So at the beginning of his Reign he was already at a disadvantage and was easily manipulated by other nobles in his council, who were already very independent and powerful “By 1255 Henry VI had become a pathetic puppet of faction”. This essentially means that he made very little decision about the kingdom himself, which shows his weakness, that he relies on other to decide for him. Also considering that as of my knowledge right now, I know not of any battles he personally took part in or commanded, and got other to fight and organize the recruiting of armies for him, such as his wife Margaret of Anjou. This to me is his biggest weakness as it means he isn't deciding his own fate, but is relying on people who are suppose to be less powerful and blessed, do his dirty work. Moreover, due to his political incompetence, he let the nobility fight amongst themselves, which ended up backfiring terribly, as when his kingship was threatened by the York’s, many of the powerful nobility felt betrayed by their King for not intervening in feuds, and therefore didn’t come to his aid. Arguably the King did possess good qualities that many people say were ahead of his time, for example, he hated war and preferred to avoid conflict. Which granted, nowadays may be seen as good qualities, but in the 1400 they were extremely looked down upon, as a leader of a nation HAD to be decisive and strong, both mentally and physically if he was to keep the country in check. Seeing as he didn’t posses traits that were considered fit for a King, nobles had a lack of respect for him, and considering the Nobilities increasing private power, was very dangerous, this is summed up by McFarlane, “Only a undermighty ruler had anything to fear from over mighty subjects”. Finally to add to the weakness of Henry VI, he had a mental collapse in the form of catatonic schizophrenia, effectively leaving him unable to speak, let alone rule a country. This was the final straw, in the direct link between Henry VI weakness and the outbreak of war, as it left the kingdom totally exposed, as it was without a functioning king, which gave the Nobility an easy way to force themselves into political power. Due to this almost gold rush of power hungry nobles and with no authority to stop them, war broke out as Families fought for their place in the hierarchy of English Society, and all the wealth and power that came with it.

Join now!

The second influential factor that contributed towards the outbreak of war in 1455 was the political ambition of Richard of York. He was one of the noblemen who took advantage of Henry VI weakness in order to elevate himself, to the point of demanding to be anointed King. However Richard of York wasn’t only fuelled by ambition, he also had several grudges towards Henry VI, which went back a long way, giving some insight to why he wanted Henry VI’s position. One of these events was Richard’s father Richard of Conisbugh, who challenged Henry V ...

This is a preview of the whole essay