• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How accurate is it to say there was significant progress towards racial inequality in the period 1945-55?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How accurate is it to say there was significant progress towards racial inequality in the period 1945-55? Racial inequality in the USA was an extensive and significant issue before, and controversially after this time period. What is crucial to say is that progress still needed to be made - this is despite the colossal step forward predominately in the legal frame work of federal government, but economic and social steps too, for example - voting rights in the southern states. Arguably though these so called steps forward both helped and hindered the fight for black equality. An example of this hinderance would be the rise in white opposition due to African American protests. One major problem in American society before 1945 was the lack of expression the black population had on American politics, and crucially if they could vote the amount of affect they could make.One effective section of American society that was positively changed by primarily Truman's government was political appointments, and political change. Perhaps interestingly you could say, limitedly that political viewpoints and acceptance had been altered. On one section we look at political appointments. Under Truman?s government we see an attitude change to black people in politics. ...read more.


Sweatt V. painter case (1950). In the Brown v. Topeka case we see that Direct action unswervingly caused the supreme court to rule in 1954 that segregation of schools was illegal. More over reported incidences of lynchings were proportionally lower in the later stages of this period, despite a boom after the increased activism. However on the whole the change is significant as it altered attitudes of the plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896, that black people can be ?separate but equal? This new ruling completely goes against this and I believe this is the true change of this period, and in many respects a beginning to the end.The evidence suggests here that without a doubt this time, due to many different factors was crucially significant to the framework of equality that was needed to change older and newer generations viewpoints on African Americans. Arguably in this light, this period seems detrimentally effective. In stark contrast we look on the other side of the spectrum. We see numerous de jure laws being placed, and we see that framework being laid - but how significant is that progress? How effective were those laws? We are now underpinning how little de facto change actually took place, especially in the political realm. ...read more.


However in stark contrast we look at the other side of the spectrum, relatively significant progress had been made. For example if you look at the years before 1945, we see little or no change to the legal framework, other than the 14th and 15th amendments that considerably contributed to equality of African Americans, however in this period we see masses of physical change in all aspects of society. More over we see increased activism due to the war laid down the fundamental roots of direct action. For example one major fault of the Journey of reconciliation was the little time it was over, 2 weeks. However these newly founded groups (UDL, NAACP, CORE) in this period grounded themselves, and learnt - for example the Montgomery bus boycott was a success, with the help of a better organised NAACP. On the whole I believe that it is hard to ignore the progress made in this period. From 1945, with primarily the help from supreme court many aspects of several generations lives were improved - and this improvement is more that can be said for any other period of time. It is this comparison alongside compelling grass root policies of Truman?s government that leads to the argument that it is accurate to say there was significant progress made 1945-55. Josh Chambers ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the significance of the role of individuals in reducing racial discrimination in the ...

    5 star(s)

    Although this wasn't much compared to what the likes King had achieved with his use of speeches. In contrast to King's policy of non-violence was the up and coming idea of 'Black Power' during the 1960's. Originating from Garvey, violent civil rights activist Malcolm X worked to make the ideology more popular.

  2. Why was the progress towards the achievement of civil rights so slow in the ...

    attracted, the more the whites stuck together in order to create a strong opposition and prevent change. However in this case the blacks economic power was stronger than the white resistance and so in December 1956 the boycott was called off.

  1. How far do you agree that the years 1945-55 saw only limited progress in ...

    This massively worsened the status of African Americans, as a large amount of southerners were against desegregation. Furthermore the Klu Klux Klan had lynched a boy named Emmett Till, who was only 14. This caused a large amount of black Americans to be fearful and intimidated by many white Americans.

  2. Why was progress towards racial equality so slow in the period 1945 - 1955?

    radical changes with the aim of making America a more just society. Unsurprisingly, due to the problems faced by Truman concerning the support of the Southern States he was unwilling to implement the full recommendations of the report. This was due to the opposition from southern democrats, (also referred to as ?Dixiecrats)

  1. How much and why did President Truman help to promote racial equality?

    and he was most probably a r****t as was his family and friends at the time. As he was starting his political career, he did what any ambitious Southern politician would do; pay $10 in membership fees to the KKK, a notorious white supremacist group (it is notable, however, to point out that he later paid them back and left).

  2. How Accurate Is It To Say That The Status Of Black People In The ...

    as a fact of life that they would have to adhere to such as by stepping off the pavement and not looking if white women were to walk past.

  1. Civil Rights Revision Cards 1945-68

    Who? KING 1. Brought organisations together ? first major collaboration 1. Impact? 1. 250,000 people = great success (nb ? a quarter were white ? demonstrated increasing white support for CR) ? impressed TV audiences across the world ?increased/strengthened white support for CR legislation 2.

  2. Who or what was responsible for the creation of a divided, racist & segregated ...

    and political rights as American citizens.? Woodrow Wilson, arguably, cemented the current Afro-American situation; he was the first Southern President since the civil war and this showed during his time in office. As President he did nothing to support any notion of racial equality or of advancement of the interests

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work