How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

Authors Avatar

Collapse of Weimar 1929-1933

How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933? [12]

The Weimar Republic did not begin on the best of footings. Before it even commenced it was fleeing from conflict it didn't want to deal with, and chose to base itself in the city of Weimar, instead of Germany's capital city Berlin which was, at the time, too unstable for a newly created government.

        It was almost inevitable, due to the fact that the Weimar Republic was established in the aftermath of WWI, that those involved with Weimar's construction would be blamed for Germany's surrender and the acceptance of the Treaty of Versailles which, in no uncertain terms, destroyed Germany, along with the German people's respect for their government. In the eyes of the people, Weimar was 'brought about by defeat' . When queried about the causes of Germany's defeat, Hindenburg claimed that it was made unavoidable by the 'defeatism' of the civilian population, politicians (particularly those who had signed the hugely unpopular and damaging Treaty of Versailles and would 'benefit' from Weimar's construction), socialists, communists, Jews and sometimes even Catholics, who had apparently played a role in selling out Germany to her enemies. The term 'November Criminals' was adopted to describe those who were seen to have “stabbed Germany in the back” through various means, particularly the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, and these 'criminals' were forever seen as a symbol of the foundation of Weimar, thus making it impossible for the Weimar Republic to be associated with anything but the defeat and humiliation the German people felt they did not deserve. It appeared that Ludendorff's plan to shift blame from the army to the politicians had been very effective, but would lead to the violence and political unrest that would eventually destroy the Weimar Republic and, ultimately, democratic Germany.

        This almost instantaneous association between democracy and defeat did not serve well for promoting the new form of government. The German nation was a nation not familiar with the freedom of being able to rule themselves, having been under monarchical rule for centuries. Because of this, Germans looked to those who filled the role of leader (a new king, if you will) more than those who had stable, sensible policies and many people veered to the extreme left and right wings for political leadership. Strength and image were considered more important by some than pragmatism, and as such, when conflict broke out, the German people grasped at those whose qualities were similar to the qualities of a Kaiser, as the rule under the Kaiser was a stable time for Germany, unlike under this new and mysterious 'democracy'. And in 1933, Hitler would fit that role exactly.

        Democracy posed another problem for Weimar, due to the components of the constitution. The Weimar Constitution created a republic under a parliamentary republic system with the Reichstag elected by proportional representation. Proportional representation is a fair and largely positive method for electing government in the majority of cases. However, it was most definitely the incorrect method for Weimar to use. As the new politicians had so little knowledge of democracy and had been basically thrown in at the deep end, they formed numerous different parties that, had they had some experience of the democratic system, would have been combined together. But as it was, Germany was full of many small parties of very like-minded and strongly-opinionated people who were relishing the chance to express their views and were not eager to compromise (perhaps the still fresh humiliation of Germany's most recent defeat caused politicians to be reluctant to be seen 'surrendering' to other parties). These smaller parties with equally as small political clout stuck by larger parties, who relied upon the support of their small-party friends in order to stay in power. Even though the republic did not fall due to the small parties, but to the strength of the communists, conservatives and national socialists, the situation of small parties being admitted into the Reichstag created unstable governments, with constantly shifting coalitions and all-too-frequent elections. The practical impossibility of a majority government made making strong and progressive moves on the part of the government very difficult, a fact only compounded by the general unwillingness of any party to yield to the suggestions of any other party. As a result, the Reichstag often failed to come to a consensus on the passing of laws, which on more than several occasions prompted President Ebert to use Presidential Decree to pass laws without any approval from the elected Reichstag, essentially by-passing democracy all together (in fact, by-passing democracy was how Ebert came into power when Prince Max of Baden transferred his powers to  Ebert in a rather legally questionable act). It would be this law of ruling by decree which would allow Hitler, upon becoming President, to ensure a rapid end to German democracy while adhering to the law at all times.

Join now!

        From 1924, despite prior  severe economic difficulties, the Weimar Republic seemed to be moving towards a brighter future thanks to the appointment of Gustav Stresemann as Chancellor and Foreign Minister. These years were referred to as the 'Golden Years' of the Weimar Republic, during which the problems of the past decade were righted. This posed a large problem for all radical parties, including the NSDAP – they fought for revolution and drew in the support of those to whom revolution seemed the only way out of their dire situation. But during the Golden Years, there was nothing the public ...

This is a preview of the whole essay