• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Lord Liverpool deal with the threat of radical challenges?

Extracts from this document...


How did Lord Liverpool deal with the threat of radical challenges? Lord Liverpool was the fifth choice Prime Minister, and no one expected him to last long in office because of this; however, he managed to hold office for nearly 15 years?but over the first 10 he faced economic issues caused by the end of the war and the impact of the resurgence of radical groups. The handling of the economic issues only resorted in more support for the radicals; for example, the abolition of income tax and the introduction of the Corn Law caused more difficulties but preserved the power of the elite. It can be seen that Lord Liverpool took similar action to Pitt in his handling of radical threats, by repressing revolts and protests rather than implementing reformation that addressed the complains of the protestors. ...read more.


In this instance, the government made use of a spy to foil the plans?George Edwards had acted as part of the group to become privy to the plot; the information he learned would go on to lead to the arrest of Arthur Thistlewood and four others as they gathered in Cato Street. This plot showed that the radicals were becoming more organised and goal-orientated in their work?with this incident being the most isolated act of defiance of the time. However, the plot was easily foiled and the conspirators were apprehended before any harm came of the cabinet; when they had been arrested, they did not inspire any uprisings, which shows the plan was unsuccessful on all fronts. The Pentrich Revolution was an attempt to revolt, stirred up by an agent provocateur?especially WJ Richards?who informed a group of workers that they could expect support from workers in other areas. ...read more.


This suspension only lasted 10 months. Also, the Seditious Meetings Act made the unauthorized meeting of over 50 people illegal?this was stop threats that came from things such as the Spa Fields riots and the Peterloo massacre. After Peterloo and Pentrich the government passed the Six Acts?they gave more power to the magistrates; the Blasphemous and Seditious Libels Act allowed local magistrates to search for and seize publications of this volition?this was used as a way of stopping radicals from spreading their message. Overall, then, the main reason that Lord Liverpool survived and handled the radical threats was the weakness of the radical challenges; they were localised, and did not spread across with national support. They lacked the unity they needed to pose a threat to Liverpool?s government. Liverpool?s ability to use spies and legislation to easily spoil any plans the radicals had managed to come up with showed how ineffective they were in attacking Liverpool?s government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    It was serious because it damaged large amounts of machinery. However, it was local splintered action of working class labourers with no united aims, for example, some wanted their jobs back and others wanted to halt industrialisation. There for they were easily defeated by the government.

  2. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    Doran points out that the majority of Puritans were neither Presbyterian or Seperatist, but simply 'conformist Puritans'. Although Neale has argued for a 'Puritan choir' in parliament, the strength of Puritan opposition was clear by the condemning of Strickland's admonitions to parliament in 1571.

  1. The luddites.

    On the occasion a group's member was sent into an unfamiliar town to locate other Luddites he would walk the streets occasionally raising his right hand over his right eye. If someone was a Luddite the proper response was for them to gesture likewise except they would do it with their left hand and eye.

  2. How 'radical' was the 'Glorious Revolution'?

    In response to this, Sancroft, (Archbishop of Canterbury) and 6 other bishops petition the King to be excused from reading his Declaration; enraging the King, he arrests all 7 Bishops on charges of sedition and places them in the Tower. Again we see James misusing his power in an attempt to have his own way and alienating his own supporters.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work