• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was Richard III as King of England?

Extracts from this document...


How effective was Richard III as King of England? In April 1493, Edward IV died suddenly and Richard was appointed 'protector' over his son who was too young to govern on his own. Richard gained the throne by he imprisoned the two sons of Edward and may even have had them executed. Like many Kings he murdered nobles (Hastings and Rivers) and their predecessors but the difference is his predecessor was a child. The usurpation was too ruthless and too ambitious that it coloured everything that he did during his reign. He tried to court popularity by the promotion of Justice, especially for the poor with the appointment of a master of requests. He donated money for the completion of St. Georges Chapel at Windsor and great kings college in Cambridge. He modernized Barnard Castle, built the great hall at Middleham and the great hall at Sudeley Castle. He undertook extensive work at Windsor Castle and ordered the renovation of apartments at one of the towers at Nottingham Castle. He abolished benevolences in 1484 and established the College of Arms in 1484, which is still here today. The establishment looks after affairs concerning heraldry. It contains coats of arms and new ones if you apply and are entitled to bear a coat of arms (Heraldic achievements). ...read more.


He felt the needed to place northerners in key position in the south yet this was likely to increase resentment among the nobility of the south. In effect he alienated the gentry of the southern countries. He was innovate as he didn't entrust the North of England to a powerful magnate instead he chose to install a council of North which would be a branch of the Royal council. He seems to be a hypocrite who contradicted himself. He was believed to have killed his nephews to get into power (without care of the law) but nevertheless appears to have genuinely wished to spread the benefits of the law to all his subjects. He even accuses his god-fearing mother of adultery for his own political ends. There are to sides to him the concerned monarch and the ruthless usurper. His policies were almost identical to Edwards. He revived the chamber finance. He granted out the forfeited lands to supports on the basis that he had annual rent from the land. His increased expenditure and growing financial peaked in 1485 and he had request loans from his greater subjects. Commissioners were sent out to the counties with letters requesting specific sums. ...read more.


When he disregarded the law and arrested and executed River, Grey Vaughan and Hastings. Showed little respect for the law when granting away the land of rebels before they had been attainted by the act of Parliament. The most notorious act was the killing of Edward IV's sons there is no proof but there is motive. His reliance upon his Northern supporters shows the narrowness of his power-base Some historians have felt that Richard III's personality remains an enigma. It is best to have as long a reign as possible to be most effective yet he had an extremely short reign lasting only two years and two months. He was a skilful tactician more hardworking than Edward and he tried many different things to try and court popularity. His assumption of the crown, however, was challenged immediately from several sides. His two-year reign consisted entirely of fighting rebellions, including an early, indirect rebellion to put Henry Tudor on the throne. When this rebellion failed, Henry Tudor took matters into his own hands and directly confronted Richard. Henry had only the most tenuous claim to the throne and the Tudor monarchs would spend the next hundred years propagandising that tenuous claim. The last fight of this rebellion, at Bosworth in 1485, resulted in the death of Richard. A new usurper, Henry Tudor took the throne as Henry VII just as Europe was entering the modern period. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain why Richard III was able to usurp the throne of England in June ...

    4 star(s)

    was getting rid of al those who opposed or threatened his right to rule and position of the throne. He already had Edward V in the tower for 'safe keeping' and he now requested for Richard the younger of the princes to be sent to join his brother in the tower to prepare him for his coronation.

  2. How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III

    However, it is said that the French only supported Henry Tudor because they were taking the attention away from themselves as their king had died and left a young heir which meant that they were vulnerable to attack or invasion to other countries.

  1. Explain why Richard, Duke of Gloucester, made himself King in 1483.

    Hastings managed the East Midlands for Edward IV. He had castles at Kirkby Muxloe and Ashby de la Zouch. He supported the new King, but disliked the Woodvilles and allied with Gloucester. Hastings especially was pivotal to Gloucester's rise to power, as he urged him in May 1483 to defend his position as Protector of Edward V.

  2. Was Kenilworth a typical medieval castle?

    This feeling of insecurity had much justification as his Barons had rebelled against him at Rochester where the siege lasted for several months. They told him he was ruling unfairly and was generally a bad king and asked him to change.

  1. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    She is predicting that this is the height of her fortune- therefore the wheel of fortune is turning against her. At this point, her husband is alive, thus she has the means to imprison people, but the next time we see her, Act 2 Scene 2, she has lost her power as 'our King is dead.'

  2. How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

    Another way of improving his popularity was to abolish benevolences, which had been greatly resented during Edward IV's reign. This began to happen when, after his coronation, he went on progress around and made a point of declining benevolences offered to him, stating that he would not practice the extortions of his brother's reign.

  1. Why was Henry Tudor able to overthrow Richard III?

    Most rebels journeyed abroad and joined in alliance with Henry Tudor - another element that increased Henry Tudor's ability to overthrow Richard. Richard's limited success at courting popularity and his decreased power base were other main reasons as to why Henry was able to overthrow Richard.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    On the other hand however in direct contrast with Bingham (2011, pg 81) is Wooding?s (2009, pg 23) account on Henry VIII, in which she identifies that Henry?s religious outlook in 1543 was reflected with marrying Katherine Parr, in which he liked to discuss theological matters with her.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work