• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the Communists won the Civil War because of the weaknesses of their opponents?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How far do you agree that the Communists won the Civil War because of the weaknesses of their opponents? The biggest challenge to Bolshevik rule was the Civil War (1918-1921). Bolshevik victory ensured the extension in power of the world?s first Communist state. There were a wide variety of factors behind the Bolshevik victory and clearly one of these was largely due to the failure of their opponents. Whites had certain weaknesses, they failed in their attempt to gain power due to a number of core reasons including the arrangement of the white forces, various ideologies and insufficient commitment to the cause. However it must be said that the numerous weaknesses within the Whites went in to help the Bolsheviks win the Civil War. Therefore I believe to a certain extent as it?s important to recognize the strengths of the Bolsheviks and the role that the Red army played must not be underestimated. A major weakness of the White forces was their lack of unity. For a start, they were politically divided containing Socialists, Moderates and Liberals whose political differences often led them into cruel disputes among themselves. ...read more.


Unlike their opponents , they had access to transport and communication networks. They were able to use these to ensure troops and suppliers reached their destinations. They could communicate more effectively because their territory was continuous, allowing them to coordinate attacks against their enemies. They could produce more munitions than the White armies, who had to rely on foreign support. Furthermore, foreign intervention in the civil war ultimately came to little. In theory the involvement of other major powers should have caused disaster and defeat for the Bolsheviks. At one point the Reds were fighting the forces of fourteen different foreign countries in addition to the Whites within Russia. However, the foreign powers were also disunited in their reason for involvement. The foreign powers seem ultimately uncommitted to their role in the Civil War, They were too exhausted and were concerned with the defeat of Germany and by 1919 they had left Russian land. On the other hand, despite the fact that the weakness of their opponents was central to explaining the success of the bolsheviks in the Civil War. However, they were not the only reason in explaining bolshevik success, they won the Russian Civil War due to their own strengths aswell. ...read more.


However, Lenin was sensible enough to see the need for change when problems arose. Following the peasant uprising and naval revolt, Lenin abandoned War Communism and replaced it with the New Economic Policy to ensure that the Bolsheviks would stay in power in the latter stages of Civil War. To conclude, there is much evidence to suggest that the view put forward in the essay is a valid one. The bolsheviks faced a divided and poorly organized enemy in the form of the Whites. Generals Deniken, Yudenich and Admiral Kolchak failed to coordinate their military forces, allowing the Bolsheviks to confront them individually. The Whites had a number of weaknesses, the most significant being their basic lack of unity, organisation and poor geographical position throughout the Civil War. While, Anti-Bolshevik forces contained those who wished to see the return of a Tsarist style regime to Liberals, Socialists and Social revolutionaries such disunity was an important factor in explaining Lenin?s success. However, we must be careful not to dismiss the strengths of the Bolsheviks entirely, particularly the assets and achievements of Trotsky. Therefore, while the success of the Bolsheviks would seem to have more to do with the weaknesses of their opponents, the Red?s did possess certain key strengths which are partly responsible for their success in the Civil War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    into Russian ports. Napoleon could no let this go unpunished. Both Alexander I and Napoleon had an inflated sense ogf their own importance. In this trial of strength, Napoleon was determined to strike the first blow. * Napoleon always claimed that this catastrophic campaign could be blamed on the weather - freezing temperatures, ice and frostbite.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    - which took the form of an attack on artistic and literary life as part of an attempt to restore the ideological supremacy of the Communist Party. * During the war Zhdanov ran the Leningrad Defence Council and the first act of 'ideological regeneration' in August 1946 was an attack on two literary journals from that city, Zvezda and Leningrad.

  1. Vietnam war

    Although state industry declined, provincial industry increased by two-thirds. * 1 million NVA and VC killed * Children and old people were evacuated from targeted areas into underground havens. Effects of War on South Vietnam (RVN) * Poverty was a major problem as half the South Vietnam peasant population (5.8 million)

  2. After the second Revolution of October/November 1917, the Civil War took place (1918)-1921). Explain ...

    Despite the amount of force used by the Whites and foreign armies, the Bolsheviks eventually won the war. Their reaction to the situation was ruthless, swift and determined. Leon Trotsky rapidly created a Red Army of over 300,000 men.

  1. "Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills ...

    Consequently, German troops entered Austria on 12th March 1938. Evidently, little skill was played by Hitler here - had it not been for Goering's intervention, Hitler and his lack of plan may have been faced with another failed Anschluss. Hitler merely assumed no action would be taken against him by the western allies, for much the same reasons with

  2. The survival of the tsars regime in Russia between 1906 and 1914 was due ...

    He believed in suppression first then reform. Yet reform should only be done to reduce social bitterness. This policy was based on trying to weaken any potential opponents so went some way to ensure the survival of the tsarist regime.

  1. How far was Mussolinis ability to secure and increase his power in the period ...

    Mussolini was able to separate himself from the excesses of violence, claiming in 1922 that the PNF had never condoned any form of violence. This claim was enough to prove that Mussolini could still be a credible leader, as despite any behind-the-scenes officially instigated violence his public image still remained

  2. How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of the Tsarist ...

    The finance minister Nicolai Bunge introduced the Peasant?s Land Bank in 1883. This offered affordable loans to peasants for the purchase of land and agricultural equipment. He also abolished the poll tax for all peasants and offered cash incentives for them to move to Siberia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work