• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899 - 1914?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899 - 1914? Warlike and aggressive suggests Germany wished to instigate war during this period. In 1899 she was a new country that had come to considerable power, and was trying to increase this status against European competition. Looking at the sources, three are 'secret', inferring the authors considered the documents true, and content in each is, therefore, to be taken as reliable. If we look at them more closely, we can consider sources four and one as more important than others, as the two authors were key in German foreign policy, von Bulow, as chancellor, had a great say in the outcome. When saying this, however, we must appreciate the chronology, and with source four much closer to the war, and being private, we should place it as more important, especially as the author is of such status. Source one confirms Germany being important in European trade, able to challenge the trade of Britain. When compared to other sources, however, it is a public address to politicians, and so is unlikely to be doctored to the extent of falsification. ...read more.


Bertie suggested the possibility of Britain allying with Germany, but also expresses the certainty of allying with a European power in the event of war. By committing to Germany, however, Britain would be committing to, "internal troubles," in Austria. This may not have been favourable to Britain, and with a possible war in which France and Russia would be opposition, the situation looks less likely for Britain to ally herself with Germany. The validity of source three can be questioned to its status as a response. It is fair that it is secret, but by being responsive, we do not know the credibility of the document to which it was responding. By analysing the wording of this we can see that he is not writing directly to Crowe, but that it is to another party. This furthers the case against the validity as the memorandum of Crowe was therefore not for the sole use of Sanderson. The opening sentence seems that Sanderson has a slight inclination toward defending the opinion Crowe levelled against Germany, but also that, because she needs defending, there must be some underlying reference. In this case it is that of, "black deeds," but Sanderson is quick to arrange the view that Germany and Britain have indeed managed a fair relationship. ...read more.


Source six has mainly been explained, but another point is the percentage increase of axis compared to allies. Excluding Italy from this argument axis had increased over 100% between 1910 and 1914 in the army. Although this increase is not evident in naval expenditure, this may be due to the restriction Germany laid upon herself, as described in source four. As these estimates are of expenditure at the time, Britain has increased expenditure, which may be due to the British Empire. Germany had no need for such expenditure outside of Europe and, therefore, her rises are more reflective of the situation. Germany is certainly warlike from 1910, but so are the other major powers. It is almost impossible to ascertain who was the aggressor from the sources, as the memorandums from Britain infer it to be Germany, although each also has a slight element of support. The sources from Germany suggest others, with only source four directly referring to Britain as the aggressor. Britain had to increase her expenditure overall because of her current empire, and the navy was key to this. Germany however raised the expenditure considerably of her army, but whether this was an aggressive or defensive motive is impossible to, as the period intervals in source six do not tell us if one expenditure was raised in retaliation to that of another. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    A war would not only divert the attention of the people and perhaps save the monarchy but also a victory would re-establish Russia to its previous status as a great power. In the Russian was cabinet there were those who wanted war, including the war minister Sukhomlinov.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The following month the German government accepted an invitation from the Sultan of Morocco to an international conference. This seemed to make the crisis even worse. * The matter was not finally settled until January 1906. The great powers of Europe met at the Algeciras Conference and decided that France would have control of Morocco.

  1. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    The propaganda messages pitched at the lowest level was designed to provide an easy alternative for any patriotic and insecure youth living during a time of national disgrace and economic turmoil. The Hitler Youth set up in 1926 provided means of attracting the younger non-voting Germany and indoctrinate them with n**i ideology.

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    Fulbright clearly saw the need to open up venues for international collaboration which is completely in line with the American goal of peace and harmony. This surely qualifies the Fulbright program as a form of exporting American values and ideals which in turn makes the program a form of public diplomacy.

  1. Why did Britain become involved in a European War in 1914?

    The British also hoped that their present alliances with Japan and Russia may enable Britain to gain some sort of concession from France, given that Britain could choose to defend her ally Japan at any given time. At the same time, Britain hoped that the French alliance with Russia would deter Russia from trying to destabilize British rule in India.

  2. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    Gladstone on the other side had sympathy for the Balkan Christians and for the rights of smaller nations especially those who wanted to rule themselves, he saw this as more important than the possible threat of Russia who in reality had never launched a large European invasion and could have easily destroyed the Ottoman Empire if she had so wished.

  1. Evaluation of key sources to address the question of increased tension

    Eisenhower's Domino Theory may have been produced in order to 'win-over' the public but there is definitely evidence that he is correct. An example of this is source B2 which shows a map of all communist controlled states and the non-communist ones that surround them.

  2. How significant was the presence of foreign powers as an influence on the nature ...

    Lebanon gained independence from France in 1943, as did Syria[11] and this was a period where many post-colonial nations in the region were first feeling their nationalist muscle, a prime example being Egypt and Nasser during Suez Canal Crisis in 1956.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work