• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far sas the Sino-Soviet Split of the late 1960s the result of ideological differences between the two Communist powers?

Extracts from this document...


How far was the Sino-Soviet Split of the late 1960s the result of ideological differences between the two communist powers? By the late 1960s relations between China and Russia had deteriorated to the extent that disagreements resulted in armed conflict, with Chinese Red Guards attacking the Russian Embassy in Beijing in 1967 and the 1969 Ussuri River Dispute. This deterioration of relations, termed the Sino-Soviet Split, was largely fuelled by China's desire to assert itself as a world power, and Russia's determination to prevent this. Conflicting national interests caused relations between the two powers to deteriorate further, as conveyed by Russia's decision to double its army divisions on the Chinese border between 1967 and 1970 following border disputes. Ideological differences were still a source of conflict, as Mao was highly critical of Russia's decision to return to capitalist ideals, labelling Khrushchev and 'rightist' and 'revisionist'. While some historians argue that by the late 1960s merely provided the excuses for, and language in which to present, the divisions, the personal, mutual dislike between the two Communist leaders contributed significantly towards the Sino-Soviet split and was largely due to their differing ideological perspectives. ...read more.


However, ideological differences were not the only source of tension, as conflicting national interests further provoked disagreements between the two powers. Arguments arose over the USSR's refusal to reduce its ties to Mongolia, which China considered to be within its own sphere of influence, and the USSR actively prevented Chinese expansion in North Korea. Russia withdrew economic aid in 1960 and refused to share its atomic or space technology. She also attempted to isolate China in international affairs by strengthening its ties with Mongolia, North Korea and Vietnam following Zhou Enlai's2 attempts to present China as the leader of world revolution. Russia's actions are generally considered to be their attempt to thwart China's struggle to become a world power. Following the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia the Chinese knew that Russia was prepared to use force against another Communist country, causing them to fear invasion and even nuclear warfare. Their fears were augmented by the appointment of Colonel General Tolubko, deputy commander of the USSR's Strategic Rocket Forces, to command the Soviet Far East Military District. ...read more.


To conclude, the mutual hostility between the two leaders, caused by differing ideological perspectives, was the most significant factor which resulted in to relations between the two communist powers deteriorating. The legacy of Khrushchev meant that by the mid 1960s relations had been damaged irrevocably and, despite changes in Soviet leadership, resulted in numerous instances of direct armed conflict. Mao was also to blame, as he was intolerant of any ideas that he didn't consider fully in line with Communist theory, deeming them 'revisionist', and considered himself superior to Khrushchev as he had been in power longer. Hypocritically, he sought a Rapprochement with the US in 1969, which he had condemned the USSR for doing a decade earlier, suggesting that the personality clash of the two leaders may not have been purely because of ideology. Furthermore, conflicting national interests were not ideological in nature. However, the different ideological perspectives of the leaders provoked tension between them and meant that they could not be solved amicably, ultimately resulting in the Sino-Soviet Split. 1 Khrushchev Remembers by Nikita Khrushchev 2 The Chinese Prime Minister ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 2 Marilyn Wilkinson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Sino-Soviet Split

    Considering the immense pressure that the CCP was under in the weeks immediately following the revolution, it is understandable that this lack of interest should place Mao in a dilemma. Forced to present the Soviets as the heroes of the Marxist cause in order to strengthen the Chinese population's faith

  2. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    A relationship between two powers that both thought they were right, yet had differing aims and methods, and continued to aggressively denounce each other's actions, was never going to be healthy, nor stable. This initial factor of a common ideology, which caused China and the USSR to unite, was ultimately

  1. Explain the reasons for the Sino-Soviet split in the 1960s And 1950s

    I said that if the worst came to the worst and half of mankind died the other half would remain while capitalism would have been smashed and the whole world would become communists."

  2. To what extent can the tensions between China and the Soviet Union in the ...

    being on the side of the Soviets as a reason as to why the Soviets are so hostile toward them. For example, China's statement after WWII that the most suitable country to get aid from is USA angered the Soviets because it showed that the Chinese was not totally against their main enemy.

  1. How important were ideological differences in the split between the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia ...

    For a little over two decades, the Soviet Union was the only Marxist state, and due to the fact that it was a union of several nationalities besides Russians, it was seen as a country that could expand to include other nations in the future.

  2. How far was the Sino-Soviet split of the late 1960s the result of ideological ...

    This didn?t improve the fact that Mao had been told by the USSR that they would receive limited military and economic aid, thus proving that the Soviets wanted to remain in control and limit their ability to prosper. The ideological differences between the two would cause many problems in which

  1. How Far was the Sino-soviet split of the late 1960s the result of ideological ...

    saw the USSR as limiting their ability to prosper- this was reinforced through the feeling that soviet economic and military aid would be limited. Khrushchev in his speech in 1956 had condemned the domestic policies of Stalin. Yet, Mao?s own domestic policies had been moulded on that of his idol,

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    As Sakwa states, Putin?s Russian society is characteristic of a centralised ?Soviet-style bureaucracy?: similar to Stalin.[7] However, a conclusion on Putin?s office is not comprehensive, as his government remains; still reforming elements of society. The ?thaw? is a clear demonstration of the importance of state prosperity (economic growth), being interlinked with general reforms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work