How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs 1917?

Authors Avatar

How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs 1917?

Nicholas ruled Russia from 1894-917 and was to be its final tsar. Nicholas accepted the throne under the impression he would rule his whole life as its undisputed leader as it was believed that he had been chosen by god and therefore had divine right to the throne. Nicholas had been determined to rule as harshly as his father; however, he was very weak and did not posses qualities capable of guiding Russia through its time of turmoil.

The World War One alone did not cause the Romanovs to fall, it did however play a major part in the collapse of the monarchy. Many historians believe that Russia was on the brink of collapse in 1914, and therefore the war didn’t matter as the tsar would have fallen very soon in any case. However I agree with the view that the war simply accelerated the revolution, speeding up something that would have not occurred for a while, or possibly no at all, had the war not occurred.

Before the war many problems faced the country, including issues stemming from their economic situation and he political problems. Together the country and the autocracy were left in a very unprotected and unstable position. Due to the rapid industrialisation and the overall growth in the Russian economy, there were several negative social issues that were only increasing in the years leading up to 1917. These included rapid growth, dense concentrations of people in small areas leading to crowded and unsanitary living conditions, dangerous and unhygienic working conditions, and low wages. All of which resulted in a growing mass discontent and disorder spread, finding expression in strikes and protests. It was only in the summer of 1914, however that there were "huge demonstrations against the monarchy", showing for the first time that the tsar had lot the respect from the majority of the Russian people.

Join now!

Both political and entirely non-political activities were suppressed by Tsar Nicholas nevertheless suppression only increased anti-government feelings, as in the case of the university protests of the 1890s. However, unlike the revolution of 1905 political activity against the government was beginning to recognize the way it must work to bring about change and began to do so slowly.

The reputation of the Romanovs had been declining as the controversial peasant, ‘Rasputin’, made his way into governmental affairs due to his ability to ease the pain of the tsar’s sick young prince. Alexandra gave him great political control in the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay