• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the leadership of Martin Luther King responsible for the gains made by the Civil Rights movement in the years 1955-1968?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far was the leadership of Martin Luther King responsible for the gains made by the Civil Rights movement in the years 1955-1968? Martin Luther King was of course a prominent member of the Civil Rights movement. However it can be argued that his leadership ? though effective ? was only partly responsible for the gains made by the Civil Rights movement in the years 1955-1968. During his leadership of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference Marin Luther King organized a variety of peaceful protests in the war for Civil Rights. One of such was the Montgomery bus boycott done in conjunction with the NAACP where Martin Luther King encouraged a peaceful solution raised through civil disobedience. His leadership in this matter was heard and protest remained peaceful all through his time as leader as the SCLC. Though King was sentenced to a year in prison ? which he only served two weeks of ? the Montgomery bus boycott helped bring the Civil Rights movement to media attention and highlighted the effectiveness of King?s policies. ...read more.

Middle

King organizing the march under the slogan ?For Jobs and Freedom?. He led two hundred and fifty thousand people ? of which twenty per cent were white ? to the Lincoln Memorial to hear a variety of speeches on black Civil Rights, including King?s own ?I have a dream? speech.? This was a momentous gathering and indicated to President Kennedy the support for the Civil Rights movement. It was also a situation in which Martin Luther King was allowed to showcase his oratorical skills to a nation waiting, seemingly, for a change in Civil Rights for black Americans. However, though the march was a success in large part due to Martin Luther King, and instrumental in forcing JFK to put into motion a Civil Rights Bill, it was not the only factor in the creation of the Civil Rights Bill, and as a result Martin Luther King could not be solely held responsible for the successful passing of a Civil Rights Bill. ...read more.

Conclusion

As a result there were little Civil Rights alterations after 1965, highlighting the importance of the presidency on all gains made by the Civil Rights movement. Martin Luther King could be described as the prominent speaker amongst the midst of many who brought black Civil Rights to the attention of those who could do something about it on a national scale: Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Presidents. As a result he was responsible to a small degree for the gains the Civil Rights movement made between 1955-1968, helping to bring de jure and de facto segregation to an end. However it must be remembered that every action was linked, and the fight for Civil Rights contained an uncountable number of acts and decisions committed for the good of Black Americans, of which many King was responsible, although not alone in his beliefs all his actions. He was simply a figurehead by which America could stand up and communicate with the President there true wishes about Civil Rights, ushering in a new era of America. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    For some it was much the same as the message of Malcolm X in that it meant to rise up against white oppression. For some it meant being proud of being black and by doing so, being proud of their heritage and where they lived by combating the poverty they were living in.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Essay on civil rights

    3 star(s)

    However, it is also important to understand the extent to which Black Americans tried to help themselves and their cause. First and foremost during the inter- war periods there was no real sense of leadership and Black Americans were lost in terms of knowing what to do and how to react within their situation.

  1. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    The event attracted world wide attention, and subsequently broadcast internationally. Abraham Lincoln's speech was spoken 100 years before King, when there was no radio or television. It was delivered at the dedication of the Soldier's National Cemetery in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania on November 19th 1863.

  2. By what stages did Martin Luther King become a key figure in the struggle ...

    It was in Birmingham that King wrote his letter from jail, outlining his reasons and establishing a firm ethos, answering criticism from other clergy he puts forwards his four steps for non violent direct action, ensuring a successful strategy is understood by all.

  1. Martin Luther King. Martin was one of Americas greatest civil rights activists, shaping ...

    judged by the ?colour of their skin but by the content of their character.? Congress passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, mostly due to this march. This law made discrimination against Black Americans illegal. In 1965, King organised a march from Selma to the state capitol in Montgomery.

  2. What was the short term significance of Martin Luther King after the March on ...

    and marches such as the one in Washington which made known the problems that they faced, to the world. This was one of the main reasons that the march on Washington took place, which shows on a political level, its major significance.

  1. How far was Martin Luther King's leadership responsible for the gains made by the ...

    of this campaign, thus setting clear goals for the campaign and having a clear idea of what he wanted to achieve. This careful planning and clear targets led to a successful campaign. SCLC authorities were able to achieve 2 main successes: large departmental stores were to be desegregated, and racial discrimination in employment was to be ended.

  2. 'Johnson alone bears the responsibility for the escalation of war in Vietnam in the ...

    The air force said that if LBJ gave them 3 months of strategically bombing NVA placements, it would win the war, which LBJ also agreed to. So he doesn?t stand up to the military or JCS. This is something that JFK does do.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work