• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How has the nature of leadership changed over the period 1790-1945?

Extracts from this document...


How has the nature of leadership changed over the period 1790-1945? Developments in warfare over this period have undoubtedly been dramatic, and the changes have necessarily occurred in all areas as individual sectors respond the challenges or opportunities presented by a certain catalyst. And, in the case of warfare developments have stemmed ostensibly and most significantly from the increasing technological proficiency across the range of procedural units which define the armies' strength. While we may be drawn naturally to the dramatic advancements in weapons technology, the nature of modern warfare is obviously also reliant on the improvements made in areas such as communication and transport because these even more clearly have allowed for the rapid expansion in forces involved in combat. In scale the World Wars of the 20th century were unprecedented, but in the conflicts of the previous decades the developments were evident and visible in a number of ways. The precedent for Blitzkrieg tactics is arguably to be found in the Franco Prussian war, and J.C Fuller also drew attention to this conflict in order to provide a degree of context for his assessment upon the effects of mechanization on the nature of warfare and its effects on the individual soldier. And, the principle of total war, to which the 20th century wars seem to conform most unarguably, was enshrined in the warfare of the Napoleonic period. But if that was a clear and decisive turning point in the future developments of military history, we must recognize that so many other elements have also changed dramatically since. It is not as simple as drawing a straight line between the warfare of that period and those of the 20th Century but in many ways the Levee en masse which effectively signaled the era of total war and mass civilian involvement has been the catalyst for a whole chain of cause and effect which has produced manifold changes in virtually all conceivable aspects of war. ...read more.


In the context of chateaux Generalship the physical conditioning of the individual was not a significant issue and it was the distance from the battlefield which allowed for the average age of leaders to creep up gradually. In this period where strategy and long drawn out battle plans were the foundation of military procedure, it was perhaps inevitable that people would come to revere the qualities of associated with age, of experience and an understanding of military tactics founded upon a solid understanding of the history and their own personal experiences The qualities of a good General are inevitably far more difficult to pin down than some would suggest in statements attesting for the singular importance of either youth or experience. The greatest Generals have possessed special human qualities which are vital to ensuring that vast numbers of men will be prepared to fight for the cause that they preach. Communicating the message with the utmost emotional impact relies as I have discussed, upon shared risk, but also on a number of other rare and valuable characteristics which can be found in the likes of Napoleon and Wellington whose military successes have defined eras in their approach. One important task for the General is in communicating their individual passion for the cause and instilling this seem will to succeed in the minds of their men. Napoleon was a leader who very much epitomized a clear cause for which to fight and in many ways his success may have been enabled by the surrounding ideological fervor which reduced the burden of motivation to some extent. The communication of ideas may be aided by remarkable oratory skills, which combined with their individual sense of mystique creates fundamental confidence in the General to lead the men to victory. In the circumstances of men like Napoleon and Wellington however, much of their ability to inspire confidence rested upon physical displays of their bravery and fortitude and an ability to keep a cool head in the heat of battle. ...read more.


Just as Grant often berated his Wellington had to cope with officers who although brave and loyal were ultimately fairly incompetent. Wellington's relationship with his men is widely discussed because he famously referred to his soldiers as the "scum of the earth", but although this does not seem a likely way to endear yourself, it was representative of his position firmly established above the men and the aura he had while also treating his men with genuine care and sympathy. The changes to Generalship across this period have been an inevitable response to dramatic shift in the way war is conducted more generally and how it is perceived in society. The retreat of the Chateau Generals was an entirely logical move made to ensure their health at a time when stability was such an essential element. The vast scale of 20th century conflict placed an unprecedented burden of responsibility in the hands of the Generals and in this task it is understandable that 'Old Heads' were favored over younger alternatives. But in my assessment of the nature of leadership across the period I would address the more significant and fundamental continuities. Principles of leadership are much debated because the individuals who perform so brilliantly possess qualities that most people cannot fully understand and as such find difficult to pin down. The element of charisma and personality of the leader is one element which transcends any factor such as age, and has been the vital element in success throughout history. Practical considerations and tactical flexibility of course are crucial, but, particularly in an age of such mass participation, surely the factor of individual and collective motivation obtains even greater significance as the margins in other areas are reduced. Napoleon and other such innovators in the tactical dimension will always be caught up eventually, but the qualities of a good leader remain unshakeable and can be adapted to fit the very changeable processes of war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was Napoleon a Dictator

    On top of that the electorate only chose 10% of government, and that 10% chose the next 10% to make up the notables who were then selected to deal with the significant issues in government. Overall the new voting system only appeared democratic, while in reality it was nothing more

  2. what role did desmond tutu have in the role to end apartheid


  1. The 80s must be Understood to Understand Australia Today

    In 2000, Sydney was host to the Olympic Games, making it one of the largest sporting events in Australia history. The frenzy that this event created would not have been possible, if the interest in sporting events had not been raised in the Brisbane Commonwealth Games.

  2. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    Early in 1881, Gladstone accepted that the power of the landlord had to be more restrained than had been done by the Land Act of 1870. The Bill that he introduced in April 1881 virtually conceded fair rent, fixity of tenure and freedom for the tenant to sell his holding at best market price.

  1. Russian History. A period of great achievement To what extent do you agree with ...

    His mental ability developed quite nicely, however, as he was taught by Simeon Polotsky. During his brief reign, many historians argue that Fedor actually ?ruled under the protectorate of Sophia his sister.? As his health began to decline, more individuals rose up to counsel Fedor, and Sophia found her influence steadily declining.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    They had no more combat ready troops. O a few powerful fortresses in the north: Crac de Chevalier, Blanc Chatel and Margat, remained in the hands of Crusaders. A Second Crusade was a total failure. Due to Muslim counter-attack the county of Edessa was lost. This happened due to failure of Crusader states to cooperate and organize help between each other.

  1. The Changing Nature of Warfare - Napoleon

    Without introducing any further battling techniques he effectively made a significant impact with his army by developing on the conventional tactics of linear battle. However, despite his successes he was not able to progress to the extent that he wished as a result of the limitation of weapons.

  2. Maos Leadership was the crucial factor in the Communists winning the 1945 Civil War. ...

    The GMD?s popularity was already slipping because of this, and when Kaishek began raising taxes, the nation?s peasants were in uproar. Famine followed on from this in the farmlands, and the situation for the Nationalists was getting worse and worse. Prices of rice rose tenfold, and hyper-inflation was in motion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work