How important was the role of the British army in the defeat of France in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars?

Authors Avatar

How important was the role of the British army in the defeat of France in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars?

While far smaller than the armies of many other European powers, by the turn of the century, the British army, through its tight discipline, sound command, and shrewd tactics, was still a force to be reckoned with. Despite early failures, such as the Duke of York’s expeditions to the Netherlands, Wellington’s efforts in the Peninsula were to prove invaluable, along with his command of the armies of the Fourth Coalition in the final defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo. However, Britain’s army was small, and the majority of land battles took place between Napoleon and the other Great Powers; Austria, Prussia and Russia, most notably at the Battle of the Nations in 1813, which lasted for an entire week. The Royal Navy arguably did more to aid the defeat of Napoleon, through her successful blockades and victories in battles such as Trafalgar. Napoleon himself must take a share of the blame for his defeat, notably through the failure of the Continental System, and the strategically questionable assault on Russia in 1812.

The superbly trained and equipped light infantry which has been produced by Sir John Moore were well-suited to the long distances and mountainous terrain found in the Iberian Peninsula. Their tactics were quite different to those of the French army, reflecting perhaps the dissimilar composition of the two forces. The British army; well-trained and equipped volunteers, fought in thin lines to minimise losses. Because of their sound training and good equipment, these lines rarely broke, and coupled with the reverse slope tactic of standing out of sight just behind the brow of a hill, the force proves very successful against the French. By contrast, the French army was large, but made up of ill-trained conscripts. Utilising their numerical advantage, the French would attack in columns, maximising the blow to enemy lines. They moved quickly, stealing any supplies they needed from the locals. However, this was a patchy and unreliable supply system: Wellington, by contrast, made meticulous preparations to ensure that his troops received adequate supplies. While inferior in numbers, the British army was far superior in expertise and tactics, facilitating the seemingly incomprehensible victories over large French forces in the Peninsula, such as that of Busaco in 1810, where a modest British force held off attack from forty-five French battalions.

Join now!

Commanded by a brilliant general by the name of Wellington, and despite lukewarm support for the campaign at home, British forces in the Peninsula won more and more battles with the French. Supplied well by sea, and with a secure base behind impenetrable fortifications at Torres Vedras, Wellington could keep his army in fine condition, and beat larger French forces again and again. 1811 saw victories at Ciudad Rodrigo and Fuentes d’Onoro, and the following year Wellington again caused Napoleon heavy losses at Ciudad Rodrigo and Badajoz. These assaults on French positions in Spain were a constant drain on Napoleon’s ...

This is a preview of the whole essay