How serious was the Lambert Simnel rebellion?

Authors Avatar

How serious was the Lambert Simnel rebellion?

During Henry VII’s reign he faced a rebellion which was serious to him at the time. Lambert Simnel was an innocent 11 year old boy who was used to impersonate Clarence’s son, Edward, Earl of Warwick. Obviously, to Henry he was a threat because if people believed that Simnel was genuine they wouldn’t want Henry as king since “Warwick” has a stronger claim to the throne. However, the rebellion only lasted a year which highlights its lack of seriousness.

Margaret of Burgundy and John de la Pole were the 2 main instigators of the rebellion. Margaret recognised Simnel as her nephew, her brother’s son. Nonetheless, the real Earl of Warwick was held captive by Henry VII at the beginning of his reign so he wouldn’t cause a threat later on like Henry VI had in Edward IV’s reign. The Yorkists were claiming that Simnel was the real Warwick and Henry’s Warwick was an imposter.

Join now!

Furthermore, Richard III had appointed Warwick as his successor. Margaret was determined to overthrow Henry VII; she was desperate to see her family return to power. In fact, she did not even want Simnel/”Warwick” to become king, the rebellion was a plot for John de la Pole to be the next king of England, after all, he did have a claim to the throne from his mother.

Lambert Simnel arrived in Ireland and he gained a lot of support, especially from the king of Ireland, eight earl of Kildare who was upset by Henry as he hadn’t accepted ...

This is a preview of the whole essay