• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was King Richard I in achieving his objectives in the Third Crusade?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How successful was King Richard I in achieving his objectives in the Third Crusade? Richard I?s primary objective in the Third Crusade was to recover Jerusalem following it?s recapture by Saladin in October 1187, an objective which he failed to see through. However, the Third Crusade was not a total disaster, as it allowed Richard to somewhat diminish Saladin?s prestige and to protect the remainder of Outremer. The Third Crusade was called following the loss of Jerusalem. When preaching for a new Crusade in 1189, Pope Innocent III claimed that the primary objective of the Third Crusade was to recover the holy city from the Muslims who had taken it. ...read more.


Following the unsuccessful first march to Jerusalem, Richard took his men back to Ascalon in 1192 to begin rebuilding the castle there in a four month construction program. Ascalon proved to be a formidable offensive and defensive castle, and he could have used it for his attack on Egypt. This was only a short term success, however, as Saladin forced him to abandon it in the 1193 Treaty of Jaffa. However, it was not a completely failure for Richard. In 1191, Richard I managed to secure the port of Acre and take it back from Muslims hands, which helped to expand the Crusader states, and in 1192 he also managed to get Jaffa back. ...read more.


The result of this was the Treaty of Jaffa, in 1193, in which Richard managed to secure the remainder of the Crusader states in return for the abandonment of Ascalon. Whilst this was successful, it was only a short term guarantee as when Saladin died in 1193, his truce died with him and the abandonment of Ascalon was also a failure as it meant that the Crusaders had wasted four months rebuilding it. Although the Third Crusade had its successes, I think that ultimately Richard I?s objectives were not met. He didn?t managed to recover Jerusalem, he didn?t get anywhere near Egypt and he lost the one castle which could have been used offensively to potentially help him in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    fact, only a few years later, the Young Ireland movement managed, characteristically of the revolutionary movements preceding it, an abortive uprising led by Smith O'Brien. The Young Ireland movement was founded on the ideals of a romanticised Ireland and forged links with what was to be known as Cultural Nationalism.

  2. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    Despite Richard's return from the Holy Land in 1192, the Third Crusade had spawned an epilogue crusade under taken by the Holy Roman Empire under the leadership of Henry VI. Under Henry the Germans were able to take Sidon and thus restore the land connection between the kingdom of Jerusalem and the county of Tripoli.

  1. What Did Charlemagne Do While In Power As King?

    Capitularies from the early 800s prescribe a system of military levying and organization apparently of some sophistication and capable of raising large armies. It is possible, however, that this organization, in so far as it was new, was a response to external threats from both hostile Vikings and Slavs from Eastern Europe, rather than the basis of Charlemagne's conquests.

  2. What was the short term significance of the Amritsar Massacre?

    On the other hand, it is possible to argue that the Amritsar Massacre was not so significant, because the popular support from Indians that Gandhi and the Congress received was not so much came from the nationalism induced by the Massacre, but from different groups who were motivated to support Gandhi and the Congress for their own interests.

  1. The mystery of Stonehenge- theories about its construction and usage.

    They also had authority to control large numbers of workers add fetch some of the stones from distant parts of Wales. The site was built during three distinct periods. At the beginning Stonehenge was a circular ditch with an internal bank.

  2. To what extent was the first crusade a success

    Also hidden in the Pope's mind at Clermont must have been the hope of reconciliation between the Eastern and Western Churches. The Pope is reported to have been pleased that Alexius came to him for help, rather than the Holy Roman Emperor in Germany.

  1. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    He primarily looked to strengthen the Navy so as to ensure protection from any potential invaders, as well as discouraging any raids from Northumbrian Vikings. Alfred in fact, designed and implemented the construction of an innovative style of ship that was 'swifter, steadier and also more responsive than the others'3.

  2. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    the eyes of the Crusaders and the context of the medieval period what we put down as luck or unique circumstances they would believe was God's Will. The Crusaders first battle was Nicaea, which was fought against Kilij, unfortunately as we only know they that the Crusader's won, and nothing else, this battle won't be helpful in answering the question.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work