• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Louis XVIII as the King of France?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How successful was Louis XVIII as the King of France? In April 1814, Napoleon abdicated from the throne unconditionally due to other European monarchs rising against him. This meant the question erupts to who was going to rule France. This decision fell on the shoulders of the quadruple alliance (Britain, Russia, Austria, Prussia), who then decided to restore the Bourbon Dynasty that had ruled in 1793. The rightful Bourbon heir was Louis XVIII, brother of King Louis XVI. To decide if King Louis XVIII was a successful monarch, success must first be defined. I would define a successful monarch as one for which puts the interests of their country first, not necessarily pleasing everybody all the time, but assuring the countries? stability in the best way possible. When Louis first arrived on the throne he had a series of problems he needed to overcome, for which some were more difficult than others, yet he managed these issues with ease. Surely this is a sign of a successful king, but how successful was he exactly? One of the more apparent problems was that of unpopularity of the Bourbon name. For 20 years the Bourbon name had been in disgrace, after the execution by guillotine of King Louis XVI on 21st January 1793. Even just the mention of the name would bring disgust to Frenchmen?s faces. ...read more.


All these issues needed to dealt with smoothly and efficiently. Louis had various options available to him; it was merely a matter of selecting the correct procedures, many of which had an impact on multiple issues. It would have been far easier for Louis to choose to side with his extreme ultra royalist supporters who had won a large majority at the elections held for the Chamber. They used this opportunity and power to take revenge and execute some Bonapartist Generals, known as the ?White Terror?. This amongst other things, this caused a Bonapartist uprising at Grenoble in May 1816. At this point realised this had potential of causing a national uprising. The king was far more moderate than the ultra royalists as he realised France could not return back to the ?Ancien Regime?. He therefore decided to dissolve the chamber in the hope that a more moderate group would get in. This was a crucially intelligent move, as in the next election the more moderate Royalist Constitutionalists won the majority. This helped the reestablishment of the Bourbon name as the majority of France supported this decision. At this time, the organisation of the French finances was beginning to take shape on a sound basis due to the expertise of Baron Louis and Count Corvetto. ...read more.


In a book written by Philip Marsell about the king, stated ?Louis XVIII, not Louis XIII, as is often said, was the last king of France for whom his people mourned?. The statement alone clarifies just how Louis had managed to win over the respect of the country, from practically being a detested outsider to becoming a beloved King. The book also comments how ?the throne had never been more secure?. This shows just how the King and the decisions he made had changed what could only be classified as a country of political instability to one for which there was no question who should rule the country in the future. At the beginning of this essay I defined a successful king as ?as one for which puts the interests of their country first, not necessarily pleasing everybody all the time, but assuring the countries? stability in the best way possible.? This is very true of King Louis XVIII. He could never please both the liberals and the Ultras, yet he made decisions that allowed France to recover from the Napoleonic wars and gain the structure and stability that had been lacking in the previous 20 years. Not only did his actions improve the country financially and politically, he became a King for which the country was proud to have and sad to see go, despite the history of the Bourbon Dynasty. Katie Tiltman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    At the twin-battles of Jena-Auerstadt in 1806 the Prussians, on the move, were surrounded and, worse still, found themselves facing the wrong way as the French attacked and the battle began. The Prussians still operating in accordance with the teachings of Frederick the Great (most of their generals had learnt their craft in his campaigns)

  2. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    of higher nature, not great measure for public order or the general good.'24 This therefore, was a major failure of the Vienna Settlement, and it is clear more could have been done to reform Europe, indicating that the failures outweighed the successes.

  1. To what extent and why did the impact of Napoleonic rule vary outside France?

    When coupled with the independence of certain rulers of satellite states, for example Louis in Holland and Murat in Naples, the level of impact of policies could be notably reduced. Although both attempted to defy Napoleon and were reluctant to implement the Continental System which would harm their subjects, neither

  2. How successful was Napoleon III?

    north and take Rome from the Pope, which in response Napoleon had to allow the Piedmontese army to move south to stop him at which point Garibaldi handed over all his conquests to the king of Piedmont instead of the Pope.

  1. How successful was the National Assembly bringing equality and liberty to France during 1789-93?

    However, when the Assembly told the clergy they would have to take an oath on the 27th November 1790 that said they would have to follow the new government instead of the Pope, 55% agreed which inevitably caused a split in the Church.

  2. How successful was Louis XVIII in dealing with problems during his reign?

    This was a successful response as it demonstrated that the King was prepared to compromise and able to gain support of the pays legal, the bourgeoisie. Another dilemma that Louis had to face was the harsh conditions of the 2nd Treaty of Paris.

  1. To what extent does the polarization of politics in France by 1824 demonstrate that ...

    The Liberals were the moderates against the royalists. The ultras hope to return to the structure of the Ancien regime, wanting to end the charter of 1814 , which aimed to create a largely constitutional monarchy. Ostensibly granted by a sovereign King, this document promised an elected two-chamber legislature to

  2. The shortcomings of Louis XVI

    The Enlightenment can be seen to have been the trigger of the French revolution as it showed people that they did not just have to agree with everything that Louis said and put forward. The enlightenment began to take effect in the 1780s as the number of people taking up careers in the church declined.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work