• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were Italian leaders at dealing with Italys problems 1896-1914?

Extracts from this document...


How successful were Italian leaders at dealing with Italy?s problems 1896-1914? As a country nearing the end of its unification process, Italy was in the midst of several key issues, including problems within the politics of the country, the social issues that arose as a result of unification, the economic stability of Italy as well as the Papacy?s role in the Italy. The prime ministers of the time, Crispi and Giolitti remained partially successful at tackling these issues, building Italy from the financial rubble into what became known as the ?economic miracle? of Italy, although with numerous social costs. A key issue that remained for much of the unification process was the problems caused by the establishment of a centralised Italian government. Despite the liberal aims of this new government that controlled the majority of Italian states, it could not be considered a full democracy due to the fact that there was extremely limited suffrage, with only around 2 percent of the total population being able to take part in voting, a so called liberal state whose government did not represent the actual majority of the Italian population. From this, the concept of ?Transformismo? was created, in response to the limited numbers that were actually able to vote. ...read more.


Social reforms made by Giolitti also led to the abolishment of child labour, with a pensions scheme for the old age and sick extended as well as the establishment of better working conditions by a compulsory weekly rest day. Similarly, under his new legislation female workers were also granted a maternity fund, in an attempt to pacify and improve working as well as living conditions for the working class majority in the south. Overall, it is clear that the Italian leaders of the time generally succeeded in improving Italy?s general society, especially Giolitti?s reforms, although hampered by Crispi?s unpopular domestic policy. Prior to the unification process, as a set of separate sovereign states success economically was hardly viable, and the unification process of the states did little to actually implant the idea of a single Italian nation within the majority of the Italian mind-set, and with a combination of economically crumbling states. To ease this issue, industrialisation was thoroughly encouraged as a way of building the ?economic miracle?, and this would be a major success as Italy began to catch up to other European countries economically. In this way the Italian leaders can be seen as extremely successful at tackling the issues of the Italian economy, with the rapid industrialisation process leading to production of commodities such as cars and typewriters in Italy. ...read more.


up would trigger an even bigger outburst, and therefore the Italian leaders of 1896-1914 generally failed at maintaining a stable relationship with the Papacy, as despite Catholics being involved in the political system, generally there was still tension emanating from both sides. The Italian leaders of 1896-1914 Crispi and Giolitti attempted numerous reforms to repair the problems of the newly unified state; the newly united Italy was economically backwards, living conditions relatively poor compared to other European countries and the democratic system a failure, failing to grant the majority of the population the vote. The leaders were only successful to a limited extent as despite the suffrage being enlarged, politically the idea Transformismo was still very much engrained and the failure to keep a stable relationship with the Church influenced voting. A success of the two leaders was in industrialising the country, increasing the standard of living and boosting the Italian economy, although this can only be considered a minor achievement due to the fact that not all of Italy benefitted; the rural southern states remained relatively poor and backwards, failing to keep up with the growing northern states. Overall, the leaders were successful to a limited extent to dealing with the problems of Italy, their successes often with shortcomings that would later strike Italy again. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Why was the Russian campaign such a disaster? * In June 1812, the French campaign against Russia began when the river Niemen crossed. Why did Napoleon order the attack on Russia? 1. Tsar Alexander I was angry with Napoleon's marriage alliance with Austria (he married Marie-Louis in 1810).

  2. How far does the North South divide in Italy explain the weaknesses of the ...

    Dialect variations created great barriers. The northern dialects bore some resemblance to Italian whereas the southern dialects for example from Sicily were completed different. For example the Italian word for Thursday is Giovedi and the Lombardy variation is "Giuedi" however the Sicilian word is "loviri".

  1. To what extent was the Italian Liberal state unstable in the years 1896 ...

    Poverty remained a desperate problem, particularly in Sicily where 0.01 per cent of the population owned 50 per ccent of the land, leaving a mass of landless peasants. Some Catholics saw the Liberal regime as infinitely preferable to Socialism. Regardless of the criticisms from the political opposition, the Liberals argued

  2. How Effectively Did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders Advance Their Cause 1801-1921 ?

    Redmond's leadership skill can furthermore be seen by the Kilmainham Treaty in April 1882 and an alliance between Gladstone and Parnell Ireland which gained further rights for Ireland as the Land Act was amended and so helped tenant farmers with their rent.

  1. How effectively did Irish Catholic and Nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    However, this destroyed his alliance with 'Young Ireland', who were disappointed with his conservatism. He was then arrested in 1844, which disabled his movement. It would seem that O'Connell was effective in many ways in advancing his cause, for example he did successfully achieve Emancipation.

  2. How far does the North-South divide explain the weaknesses of the liberal state in ...

    Many felt unification was incomplete because Austria still occupied the 'unredeemed' lands of Trentino and Trieste, while a blow was dealt to Italian pride by their defeat at the hands of the Abyssinians at Adowa in 1896.

  1. How successful were Italian leaders at dealing with Italys problems between 1871 and 1914? ...

    This shows how Depretis and other Italian leaders such as Crispi and Giolitti were unsuccessful at dealing with Italy?s problems. They thought that the issue would solve itself ? however, it did not and trouble began to grow in the South as the people felt they had been betrayed and left isolated.

  2. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    This presents that it was the foreign dominance of Austria that helped to spark the revolutions of 1848. Austria's capital, Vienna, saw similar problems with a revolt causing the fall of Metternich on 13 March. Gooch describes how "the news of the fall of Metternich on 14 March and the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work