• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successfully did Lenin establish Communist rule 1918-1924?

Extracts from this document...


How successfully did Lenin establish Communist rule 1918-1924? Lenin used many different means to attempt to make his Communist ideal work in Russia. He, effectively, utilised propaganda, pragmatism and a certain amount of good luck to keep his reign secure, and also to make sure that it was likely to stay secure for a good many years to come. His pragmatism was shown in his quick change of economic policy after the Kronstadt mutiny, even though it meant him turning away from the basic tenets of the Communist idea. The fact that Communism actually lasted until the late 1980s show that his initial work in establishing it was, by definition, successful. One of the things that made Lenin such a successful leader of Communism was the fact that he was able to change his ideas to suit what he needed to do with the country, disregarding the protests of others to do what was best for the regime. An excellent example of this is his change from War Communism to the NEP (New Economic Policy). ...read more.


This did not work though, and Lenin was forced to give up 25% of his best farming land in the Brest-Litovsk treaty, a loss which could have been worse had it not been for his propaganda machine working overtime to stop the Russian public from rebelling over this near capitulation to the Russian's oldest enemies. However, not all of Lenin's decisions were good ones. To appear true to his word, in 1917 he held free elections for all. Unfortunately for Lenin, the Communists did not receive the majority of the vote, as he had feared would happen. The Social Revolutionaries ended up with the majority of the vote, with double the amount of seats in the Constituent Assembly than the Bolsheviks had. Lenin dealt with this problem in his typically direct style. He sent his Red Guards to close the Assembly soon after it had opened, and despite small protests, also crushed by the Guards, the Assembly was forgotten. This was a small blip in Lenin's judgement, which was, fortunately for him, easily solved and did not cause too much damage to his campaign. ...read more.


Some of the things that he did were to lessen the power of the church, which up until then had been a great force in the life of many of the peasants, and for the Bolsheviks to succeed they needed to have no opposition whatsoever. They also achieved this by banning the opposition political party and all non-Bolshevik newspapers. To appeal to the general worker and peasant, they also introduced a 48-hour week and insurance against injury or illness for them, something which no other previous government had done. This caused the general public to feel more inclined towards the new Government, and helped Lenin in his quest to establish Communism in Russia. In conclusion, I believe that Lenin was very successful in establishing Communist rule. Despite making some bad decisions, such as holding free elections and trying to stall in negotiations with the Germans, they were more than often solved to the advantage of Russia, and caused no lasting damage for Lenin's regime. Even if the idea was not Communist, it was always used to keep the Communist dream alive, and to secure its existence for the next 70 years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the Bolshevik rule from 1917 to 1924 was shaped more ...

    support of the people? Pipes make?s some relevant points that Lenin had lost support and more importantly his own party was stabbing him in the back as Laver points out with the example of Stalin and a point Acton make?s that the party would oppose Lenin because they wanted power above all else.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    There was widespread famine in 1932-3, especially in the Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Caucasus. Millions of peasants died. 3. Agriculture remained the poor relation of the soviet economy; farming remained inefficient, often unproductive and with poor levels of mechanisation. Peasants lacked incentives to work hard.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work