Why does the Chinese government at the start of the 21st c. refuse to give its people democratic rights despite encouraging private enterprise in industry, commerce and agriculture and how do you see China developing in the future?
RUSHI PATEL 11M WHY DOES THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT AT THE START OF THE 21st CENTURY REFUSE TO GIVE ITS PEOPLE DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS DESPITE ENCOURAGING PRIVATE ENTERPRISE IN INDUSTRY, COMMERCE AND AGRICULTURE AND HOW DO YOU SEE CHINA DEVELOPING IN THE FUTURE? Chinas history is plagued with foreign intervention, invasion and natural disaster, but it is also booned with great, world leading technological advances and years of perfected heritage. The plain to see pattern that has formed over Chinas history is that during their failures there has been a lack of strong political leadership, and during prosperous years there has always been a single strong political rule. 'Among large countries, China has the worlds oldest continuous civilisation. It can point to 4,000 years of experience, plus gigantic size and accomplishments.' CHINA IN TRANSITION Modern China holds a strong one party rule, but it holds one, which has a political aim. The economy in China is steadily growing and has a projected growth rate of 8% increase in G.D.P per annum. Huge amounts of foreign investment are fuelling rapid growth, especially in the southern boom areas. China also has a huge population of 1,221,462,000 with a growth rate of around 1.2% (1991 - 2000 figure). Many changes have taken place in China such as social change, industrialisation, environmental impacts and the development of two
Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens labour market position.
Women and social change To what extent did World War One effect womens labour market position _________________________________________________ In the years leading up to the Boar war in the late 18 hundreds, women's role in society was clearly defined. The ideology of the time was that a woman's place was in the home, there was no better or more fulfilling way for a woman to spend her time than staying in the home to cook clean and raise children. Women were only educated as a means of enabling them to acquire skills that could use in the home and with there family, as this would higher there standard of living, Darwin, Sharpe (1976). Moreover, attitudes towards women's position within the labour market were defined by such beliefs. Putting the beliefs of the time into context shows that they were interlined with class and the idea of the British race. The "ideology of domesticity" prominent in the 18hundres was as relevant to the middle class women as it was to working class women, Purvis (1987). However as June purvis has said "what was considered appropriate, relevant and unattainable for the middle classes was inappropriate, irrelevant and unobtainable for working class women, Purvis (1987). As it was, not working was economically obtainable for women in the middle classes and seen as appropriate and relevant to a woman's social standing. However, physically exhausting
How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became Involved in the War in Vietnam?
How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became Involved in the War in Vietnam? Source A is a speech made by the US president, President Johnson in April 1965. The speech was said to the public, one month after the start of Operation Rolling Thunder. During the speech, President Johnson is defending the Vietnam War, as he was the American President who first put troops into Vietnam and as a result is going to stick with his idea. President Johnson says that America first became involved in Vietnam in '1954' as '...every American president has offered support to the people of South Vietnam. This suggests that President Johnson was forced into supporting the war and helping South Vietnam in order to continue with tradition, remain loyal to America and also stand in good stead with the public. Source A suggests that America became involved in the war in Vietnam for a number of reasons. One reason was that America had '...a promise to keep.' This shows that America is very loyal and is a good thing for President Johnson to say during a speech to the public, as the public would like to see loyalty. America also became involved in the war as they want South Vietnam to become independent from the north of Vietnam. 'Our objective is the independence of South Vietnam.' This shows that America were involved in the war in order to help South Vietnam and prevent
Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a
Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States and the Soviet Union in the Period 1944- 1950. In 1944 the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, were allies in the war against National Socialist Germany and her Fascist Axis allies in Europe; however by 1950 the relationship had disintegrated to such an extent that the two countries had on more than one occasion nearly gone to war with each other. How had this situation arisen, and what were the implications not only for the two protagonists in what became known as the Cold War, but also for the rest of the world in this new Atomic Age. There was no definite date on which the erstwhile allies began to regard each other as potential adversaries and rivals for world influence. Neither, was their one definitive or underlying reason, for the difference of opinion between the erstwhile Second World War Allies. However, in the latter stages of the conflict and the years immediately following it would emerge a pattern of misunderstandings, miscalculations, misjudgements and suspicions which would come to characterise the following fifty years or so, in the relationship between the two countries and their respective allies. In order to assess the political realities of the situation pertaining at the time it is necessary to consider the geopolitical
Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?
Vietnam Coursework; Assignment One, Objective two . Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s? The involvement of the USA was not a sudden event; it was a gradual slide into war that began with financial support of the French to regain power of Vietnam. After World War II, the Vietminh were very quick to replace the Japanese in Vietnam, and by September 1945, Ho Chi Minh announced that it was an independent, democratic republic. But the French also wanted to regain power of Vietnam and by March 1946, the French claimed victory over the communist Vietnamese. At this time the USA was not really very interested in who was in power of Vietnam. They were even sympathetic towards the Vietnamese people, who, the US felt, deserved independence after so many years of colonial French reign. During the period from 1946 to 1949, fighting broke out between he French and the Vietnamese Communists, but the French were virtually unaided by the US. But in 1950, what the Americans thought about French rule in Vietnam had totally changed. This was due to the Cold War with the Soviet Union. The USA would give support to any country opposing communism at this time. So this was one of the reasons why the USA became involved in Vietnam. They wanted to contain communism, as they feared it and all that it stood for. Communism was the total opposite to everything that the Land
For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?
Plan and Record of Procedure When we were asked to consider a question to answer, which would have been suitable for our personal study, I knew straight away that I would want to structure my question around Pearl Harbor. Since childhood, watching movies about Pearl Harbor always caught my attention. From most movies and books it seemed to me as if the Japanese people were just cruel and evil people, who had no basis to attack America; so was this the reason for the bombing? That they were just cruel people? Or did they have a legitimate reason which had been completely cut out of history by authors and the Hollywood directors? That question was embedded in my mind, and I always thought that I would research it when I had time, or to speak the truth, be motivated to. After sitting a few classes in lower sixth history, which was based upon our personal studies; I had realised that this was the 'time' I was looking for. I could answer a question that really made me think, and not only that I would also be doing it as a little study. This furthered my interest on such a crucial time during World War Two. I went to the library and took out a couple of books regarding Pearl Harbor. Once I had read the books; I assumed I would now know the reason for Japan bombing Pearl Harbor, but the books I read had something in common, it told me how the bombing took place, how many
In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev was the most successful leader of Russia?
In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev was the most successful leader of Russia? Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev was and remains Russia’s most conscientious leader, who correctly identified problems within Russia and the first to initiate fundamental change, which would bring about sustained prosperity and stability within all aspects of Russia. In order to implement this, Khrushchev had either rejected previous policies for their failure or weaknesses to adequately work, in order to replace them with ones more functional at grassroots level, or to first produce policies that would allow initial growth to occur. It is these policies which have remained fundamental to Russia; though later leaders may have furthered or readjusted them, their initial purpose remained at the core of many later policies. Reforms were intended to produce an improvement in all elements of Russia’s state functioning collectively; with the intension of such policies providing the groundwork for their further development by later leaders and this is precisely what is noticed in succeeding offices, which saw an elaboration of certain elements of Khrushchev’s initial policies. It is these initial policies which laid the basis for further reform, which allow me to deem Khrushchev the most successful leader; as it was reformations implemented on his behalf, which
Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the period 1923 - 1936.
Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the period 1923 - 1936. The NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei), who were in the early 1920s, "a small and not particularly distinctive element in the multifarious and fragmented German volkisch movement" had become by 1936 the ruling organisation of German society. There were many factors influencing the German mass support to swing towards the party during 1923-36. In the face of economic turmoil, the overbearing influence of foreign countries on their Fatherland and the inability of presiding governments in dealing with crisis, the German people lived in national outrage and desperation. These feelings were further heightened by events such as the French invasion of the Ruhr, hyperinflation, and the depression. The period's lack of continuity and lack of progressive change under the Weimar Republic had caused Germany's people to lose confidence in their country's future and they began to believe that under the Republic, Germany will never be able emerge from the chaos to it's rightful position in the world stage. In the background of such social turmoil, the ruthlessly opportunistic Nazi leadership began accumulating support as a result of desperate people searching for desperate solutions. Willing to use any situation to their own advantage they portrayed themselves as the only
Evidence and Source Questions on Atomic raids on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945
Robert Flack History Coursework 2002 0072 Evidence and Source Questions on Atomic raids on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945 Question One Source A is a propaganda leaflet. Therefore, it is of little value as evidence about America's use of the atomic bomb in August 1945." Do you agree or disagree? I feel that this leaflet is very useful to historians, although it is admittedly very biased towards America and written from a desperate American perspective, we can look at this source and gather essential information about their aims behind this leaflet, the overall perception of America as a leading force and the mentality of the Japanese. The leaflet was dropped the day after the raid on Hiroshima. The main and clear purpose of the leaflet was to scare the Japanese people, it needed to hit them hard and make clear that the aftermath of flotsam that lay in Hiroshima was likely to be repeated should the Japanese not surrender unconditionally. America knew the mentality of the Japanese and the calibre of civilians they were dealing with. Their loyalties to the country were epitomised at Iwo Jima and Okinawa where thousands of Japan's troops lost their lives while only a minority surrendered. America knew that this mentality was a hard one to combat, they feared that invading the country conventionally would mean great loss of American life, and, for that matter
The great war plan, preparations, collapse, and recovery - a revised view
Russia In World War 2 The great war plan, preparations, collapse, and recovery - a revised view The history of Russia in World War 2 is still being revised. In the first decades after World War 2, the historiography of Russia's part in the war in between 1939 and the end of 1941, was largely based on a combination of the strictly censored Russian state propaganda's version and of what was known outside Russia, which was then closed behind the "Iron Curtain" of the Cold War. Eventually, two new factors provided new insights and new proofs which enable a revision that let us get much closer to the truth. The first factor was the great and laborious work of a few open-minded 2nd generation independent researchers like Viktor Suvorov and Mark Solonin, which applied analytic approaches to the vast scope of publicly available Russian wartime and post-war documentation and literature, detected thousands of small details of information that slipped over the years through the Soviet censorship, and processed these into coherent new insights which dramatically changed our perception of what happened, both before the German invasion (Suvorov's work), and after it started (Solonin's work). First and foremost of these researchers was Vladimir Rezun (known by his pen name Viktor Suvorov), a Russian military intelligence officer who applied his deep knowledge of intelligence
