• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is There Still an Imperial Presidency?

Extracts from this document...


IS THERE STILL AN IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY? Writers of the constitution intended for congress to be the most powerful branch of government. They invested in the president: the powers of the monarch, but subjected him to the democratic principles of accountability which was ensured by a complex system of parliamentary and judicial checks and balances. For over a century the US got along fine with a relatively weak president whose major role was simply to carry out the laws and policies made by congress, however, there has been erosion in this system. Presidential power only started to grow after the 19th century when the US set out on its path to empire. A great transformation of the president's power came with Franklin D. Roosevelt. When he came into office in 1933, he declared the great depression1 a national emergency and announced that he would treat the depression as a war. Although congress did not approve of this, he still presided over the nation. Roosevelt also stayed in office for more than four terms until his death in 1945. His forceful leadership and many years in office inspired a term, 'the imperial presidency' that would be applied to subsequent president with similar leadership style. Imperial means one that is superior in authority or acting like an emperor. ...read more.


Terrorism is a crime against humanity and as such should be treated as a criminal offence and should be dealt with by the police. President W. Bush declaring war on terrorism without the approval of congress is unconstitutional and it is an abuse of power. The war in my opinion was infused with the spirit of seeking unilateral American dominance. President Bush's policies on foreign affairs are examples of his arrogance of power; telling President Yasser Arafat to step down or telling the Palestinians they cannot vote for Arafat, the war on terrorism, the invasion on Iraq and deposing Iraq's Saddam Hussein are unconstitutional because congress did not approve of it. It is unprecedented in the history of any democratic nation, thus taking it back to the colonial era. And by these actions, he is acting as an imperial president. There have, of course, been occasions when a sitting President has assumed war making powers with little regard for the views of Congress or the general public. US forces were already involved in Vietnam when Lyndon Johnson engineered the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution of 1964, and George Bush Senior agreed in a two-day Senate debate on US intervention in the Persian Gulf, but George W. Bush has surpassed his predecessors in the assumption of imperial powers--most obviously, perhaps, in his tendency to conflate America's war against terrorism with his own existential destiny. ...read more.


The issue of imperial presidency is some worth similar to George Orwell's famous book; "the animal farm" where there was a search and desperate need for a perfect leader who is unbiased and would follow the lay-down rules of the founding fathers. But each time they get deceived into voting in the wrong person no leader can ever be perfect and when put in such great place of power seize to make best use if not exceed the boundaries of the power. This is why Congress has to place a check and balance on presidency, the leniency of congress is becoming a course for concern. When congress gave Lyndon B. Johnson a free hand to do whatever he believed was necessary in Southeast Asia, the result was the deadly Vietnam War that ripped America apart. Now congress is being extra indulgent with the bush administration. The people should show their resentment to the imperial presidency. Also election should be done justly so that the fluke that put Bush into administration doesn't occur again. If congress and the judiciary can put a proper check like that of Nixon's or Ronald Reagan's regime, congress would acquire its rightful position in the balance of power and the democratic nation which the founding fathers intended for would be derived. 1 Fight against communism 2 About 2,400 detainees being held by US military troops ?? ?? ?? ?? ISI INEGBENIKI ISI Page 1 10/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Ronald Wilson Reagan still found a way to change the face of the United ...

    Reagan eventually became the president of the Screen Actors Guild, and this experience prompted him to develop an interest in politics. Reagan began his political career as an active Democrat. He admired Franklin D. Roosevelt and supported other Democrats such as, Harry Truman.

  2. 3 presidents

    "Never again seek an additional foot of territory by conquest". He became president on near enough the verge of the beginning of the First World War. This fact challenged him as a president. Germany had attacked the 'neutral' Belgians. Despite feeling sympathetic towards the Belgians, Wilson didn't do anything.

  1. In What Ways Were Britain's Imperial Policies Before 1952 Influenced By The Development Of ...

    As well as the free passage of Soviet warships and joint Russian-Turkish bases in the Straights, the Potsdam conference also revealed that the Soviets were seeking a position in Libya though the acquisition of trusteeship over Tripolitania. Britain wanted to obtain responsibility of Cyrenaica in the east as the region

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    that black people ceaselessly protest Jim Crow laws, demand education in the highest professions as well as in crafts, and work for complete social integration. In 1910 the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) was founded to advance these ideals.

  1. History of the United States

    In 1954 a long and dramatic series of congressional hearings, the first to be nationally televised, destroyed McCarthy's credibility. He was censured by the Senate, and a measure of national stability returned. The Eisenhower Years Eisenhower declared himself uninterested in repealing the New Deal, but he was socially and economically conservative and his presidency saw the enactment of few reforms.

  2. American History.

    The opposition to these measures was lead by Madison, who objected to the Assumption Bill b/c it (1) gave the central gov't too much power and (2) Virginia already paid. He objected to the new securities b/c he felt it was ripping off the original holders.

  1. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    after the cease fire with Iraq in 1988, the speaker of the Iranian parliament and commander in chief of Iran's armed forces and later Iran's President, Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, declared "With regard to chemical, bacteriological, and radiological weapons training, it was made very clear during the war [with Iraq] that these weapons are very decisive.

  2. George Walker Bush.

    Education policy named 'No Child Left Behind', includes mandatory national testing and some support for school vouchers. It also makes high school academic records available to military recruiters. Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and other domestic fields is claimed to decrease dependence on oil imports, particularly from the Middle East.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work