Maos Leadership was the crucial factor in the Communists winning the 1945 Civil War. How far do you agree with this statement?

Authors Avatar by emberie (student)

  “Mao’s Leadership was the crucial factor in the Communists winning the Civil War”. How far do you agree with this statement?

   During the 1930’s, China was split by the conflicting political ideals held by the Nationalists (the Guomindang) and the Chinese Communist Party. There had been tension between the two parties for some time, and yet despite the trouble between them and their differing views, they both wished for a unified China. All the same, their fight for power continued throughout the 1930’s and into the mid 1940’s. The success of the Communists in this long battle meant a new, changed China without the former inequality and old-fashioned culture. There are many reasons why the Communists won the struggle for power; use of guerrilla warfare, a loyal and committed army, and a popular strategy of reform. General Mao’s role in the Communist party can be argued as the most important factor in their victory. He led the Communist party after Sun Yatsen, and changed the way the party worked during the power struggle. He began the use of Guerrilla warfare, and he was idolised by many of the Chinese due to his leadership during the Long March. This essay will focus on the importance of his role during the Civil War, and how other factors also influenced the outcome of the War.

   The Nationalists entered the Civil War as the stronger of the two parties, and yet their power dwindled quickly over the years of the War. There were many reasons for this, and probably chief among these reasons was that they neglected the needs of the majority of the population; the peasants. The peasants made up around 80% of the population of China, and they were mainly farmers with little of anything – land, possessions, or money. They had been ruled over by cruel warlords for some time, and had waited for changes to come which would improve their lives and, more importantly for them, their income. The Nationalists were supposed to bring this change. However, when Chiang Kaishek brought his party to power in China’s cities, he focussed on governing for the benefit of the richer upper classes. He widely neglected the peasants, and they had to continue life much the same as before. The GMD’s popularity was already slipping because of this, and when Kaishek began raising taxes, the nation’s peasants were in uproar. Famine followed on from this in the farmlands, and the situation for the Nationalists was getting worse and worse. Prices of rice rose tenfold, and hyper-inflation was in motion. By 1946, China was in economic turmoil, with corruption and rioting spreading fast, and anti-Nationalist strikes taking place in the cities. The GMD tried to resolve this by borrowing further international funds, and printing more notes. Money now had hardly any value, and with little support for the party the common belief was that “apathy, defeatism and resentment are spreading fast in Nationalist ranks, causing surrenders and desertion.” The GMD’s army was fast losing soldiers, and with the party in this state it was only too easy for the CCP to take advantage of the situation.

Join now!

  The use of guerrilla warfare against the GMD in the civil war meant that the CCP could emerge from most of their battles in success. The people’s liberation army (PLA) were greatly outnumbered by the GMD. However, the PLA’s use of guerrilla tactics often put the GMD into tricky situations, leading to more victories for the PLA with fewer casualties. Soldiers in the PLA were trained to have unfaltering loyalty and belief in the Communist cause, and this meant that those who fought had both their obligatory commitment to the army, and a personal commitment to what they were ...

This is a preview of the whole essay