• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Of all the factors that led to the outbreak of World War I in 1914, imperialism was by far the most important." How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tim Bell History 05/10/04 Outbreak of World War I "Of all the factors that led to the outbreak of World War I in 1914, imperialism was by far the most important." How far do you agree with this statement? One cannot conclude that one factor was more important than another in the outbreak of World War I. A gradual combination of more than one factor led to a 'time-ticking b**b' ready to explode at any time. Imperialism was a factor leading to war, yet not the most important. As one looks at the time period before the war, one can see the Allicance System, Militarism, Economic Rivalry, and Nationalism also as reasons for disruption among the European powers. One could argue - as many historians due - that the cause of the war was sparked by one single event - the assasination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, yet one must look at events previous to that which would have allowed such tension for such an event to take place in the first place. As David Thomson states, "The most important thing about the First World War is that it was the unsought, unintended product of a long sequence of events which begin in 1871". Therfore, you cannot put importance on a causing factor to the Great War as it was a sequence of chained events. ...read more.

Middle

This was to assure for defence against France, yet Russia pulled out of this alliance after 5 years in 1879 leaving Germany and the Austo-Hungarian in 'The Dual Alliance'. This alliance ensured at least neutrality in the case of an attack by Russia or its ally towards any of the two nations. Three years after the formation of 'The Dual Alliance', Italy joined them forming a new 'Triple Alliance'. Because of the occupation in Tunis, Italy felt more secure in alliance with a common enemy. The 'Triple Alliance was merely against France, not Britain. In 1887, a reinsurance treaty was signed between Russia and Germany which meant neutrality between them unless a direct attack by Germany on France was made, or an attack by Russia on Austria-Hungary. This would ensure Germany not to have a hypothetical two-front war. The treaty was not renewed after 3 years, due to a lack of interest by the new German Kaiser. Russia and France now feared the 'Triple Alliance' therefore creating an alliance amongst them known as the Franco-Russian Alliance. The purpose of this alliance was to act as a defense against the 'Triple Alliance'. In 1904 an alliance was created between Britain and France. This was a weak alliance which only created a diplomatic support and agreement on areas of mutual interest such as Egypt and Morocco. ...read more.

Conclusion

This changed when Germany reacted and six-folded their coal production in 1913. That same year, Germany increased its standing army for few reasons. Russia and France took a further step towards war and inreased their military service years. At this point, a war seemed even more likely due to the focus on militarism. Countries started to think about creating war plans. A man named Alfred Von Schlieffen was responsible for German's plan. The plan would take into account the allied system between France and Russia and a hypothetical two-front war. This plan would allow for a fast and hard knock towards Paris through neutral Belgium, and take out France before Russia could mobilize their troops on the Eastern front. Although this plan was top-secret, it showed that German surely expecting a war, therefore ready for an outbreak. Therefore, although imperialism played an important role in the outbreak of the war, one cannot forget all the other factors involved. Imperialism did not play the most important role in the outbreak of the war. It was a combination of nationalism, the alliance system, militarism, and imperialism that led to the outbreak of the war. One could perhaps argue that without the alliance system, without militarism, without imperialism, or without nationalism there would not have been a war, but all of them are surely directly related and I do not think importance of a factor is relevant to the outbreak of the Great War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was the alliance system responsible for the outbreak of World War ...

    5 star(s)

    A war could silence the SPD's complaints temporarily and provide good propaganda for the Kaiser. Likewise, Austria-Hungary also wanted a war as a way of demonstrating her power on the political stage and maintain her rapidly shrinking empire. It might also be said that other nations wanted a war; Russian

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    It may also be pointed out that despite US accusations of Soviet expansionism, the CIA intervened in the Italian elections and French trade union affairs to counter communist influence, following the events of 1948. Furthermore, while Stalin agreed to not get involved in the civil war in Greece and not

  1. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    This in turn had done much to fuel the tension between the two states. 2 Other influential figures within the Austrian cabinet include Conrad von Hotzendorff the Chief of Staff who had been calling for a preventive attack on Serbia for years.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * In early 1914 Britain and Germany were probably on better terms that they hid been since Bismarck's time. But that was soon to change. The Balkans * The collapse of Turkey created a power vacuum, of which both Russia and the Austrian Empire tried to take advantage.

  1. How important was the war at sea

    They would watch down to the sea for the submarines and if there was one they would immediately report it to the allies ships around them. There were also new guns invented to fight back the planes from the ground.

  2. To What extent was the German Government responsible for the outbreak of the First ...

    Law 1900 which laid way to doubling the size of the German fleet to threaten the British supremacy. The Kaiser hoped that it would force Britain into an alliance with Germany if they could no longer rely on their ability to protect their colonies via the navy.

  1. Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War?

    The Russian government was also worried about domestic instability (revolutionary activity, worker unrest). The Tsar hoped to score a foreign policy success that would divert attention of society away from domestic problems. Russia was vitally interested in controlling the Dardanelles.

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    Were the Kulaks not of economical benefit, during and before the tenure of Stalin? The primary creation of the Kulaks by Stolypin, was for economic growth.[30] Khrushchev?s criticism was not on the idea of producing grain on a grand scale to export for an economic capital, in turn redirecting the capital to industrial expansion, rather the way it was implemented.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work